[Structural or functional relationship between immunohematology and distribution - Which elements for controlling risks?] / Lien immunohématologie-délivrance structurel ou fonctionnel ­ Quels éléments pour la maîtrise des risques ?

OBJECTIVE: Transfusion safety is based on the availability of safe and compatible blood products at the right time and to the right patient, and requires close monitoring in order to detect possible incidents. The decree of June 20th 2018, which establishes the national blood transfusion's guiding plan, states that the organization that prevails throughout the national territory is built around an inseparable link between the implementation of erythrocyte immunohematology and the labile blood products delivery by authorised structures. METHOD: The article describes the two types of the link's organization, structural or functional, used to develop the comparative risk-benefit analysis. RESULTS: The structural link, which has fewer interfaces, reduces risk situations that lead to delays in release by default of a compatible product. The cases in which a functional link may have a greater benefit than the risks generated are those related to a geographical distance between the delivery site and the patient's place of care. In these cases, a functional link is possible provided that certain organizational points are mastered. CONCLUSION: The comparative analysis shows that the structural link is to be favoured since that the coherence of the patient's care and his care path is ensured. In certain situations, mainly geographical, the functional link can have a benefit that offsets the risks generated by the new interfaces; provided that the system is secured by a real tripartite collaboration between health care institution, biology laboratory and delivery site.

Relevance and costs of RHD genotyping in women with a weak D phenotype.

OBJECTIVES: For pregnant women, the serologic test results of D antigen will determine the frequency of RBC antibody detection as well as the indication for RhIG prophylaxis. RHD genotyping is the only method that may provide clear guidance on prophylaxis for women with a weak D phenotype. This analysis evaluated the economical implications of using RHD genotyping to guide RhIG prophylaxis among pregnant women with a serological weak D phenotype. METHODS: We compared the costs of 2 strategies in a cohort of 273 women with weak D phenotype. In the first strategy, we did not perform genotyping and all women with weak D phenotypes were treated as if they were D-, thus considered to be a risk of RhD alloimmunization. These women all received the prophylactic follow up. In the second strategy, RHD genotyping was performed on all women with a serologic weak D phenotype. Then, the follow-up will be determined by phenotype deduced from genotype. RESULTS: On the studied cohort, the additional expense occurred by genotyping is 26,536 €. RHD Genotyping has highlighted 162 weak D Type 1, 2 3, that could safely be managed as D+ and 111 partial D to consider as D-. By comparing the 2 strategies, the savings generated by genotyping the patients of our cohort are € 12,046 for the follow up of one pregnancy. Knowing that in France, a woman has on average 2 pregnancies and that the genotyping is carried out only once, the savings generated for the following pregnancies would be € 38,581. CONCLUSIONS: Performing RHD genotyping for pregnant women with a weak D phenotype enables to clearly identify weak D type 1, 2 or 3 from the other variants at risk of alloimmunization. This analysis generates savings in terms of follow-up schedule of pregnant women and RhIG prophylaxis. It also allows saving of D- products for patient with a weak D type 1, 2 or 3 in case of a transfusion need.

Unreliable patient identification warrants ABO typing at admission to check existing records before transfusion.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study describes patient identification errors leading to transfusional near-misses in blood issued by the Alps Mediterranean French Blood Establishment (EFSAM) to Marseille Public Hospitals (APHM) over an 18-month period. The EFSAM consolidates 14 blood banks in southeast France. It supplies 149 hospitals and maintains a centralized database on ABO types used at all area hospitals. As an added precaution against incompatible transfusion, the APHM requires ABO testing at each admission regardless of whether the patient has an ABO record. The study goal was to determine if admission testing was warranted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Discrepancies between ABO type determined by admission testing and records in the centralized database were investigated. The root cause for each discrepancy was classified as specimen collection or patient admission error. Causes of patient admission events were further subclassified as namesake (name similarity) or impersonation (identity fraud). RESULTS: The incidence of ABO discrepancies was 1:2334 including a 1:3329 incidence of patient admission events. Impersonation was the main cause of identity events accounting for 90.3% of cases. The APHM's ABO control policy prevented 19 incompatible transfusions. In relation to the 48,593 packed red cell units transfused, this would have corresponded to a risk of 1:2526. CONCLUSION: Collecting and storing ABO typing results in a centralized database is an essential public health tool. It allows crosschecking of current test results with past records and avoids redundant testing. However, as patient identification remains unreliable, ABO typing at each admission is still warranted to prevent transfusion errors.

[Organization of safe cost-effective blood transfusion: experience APHM-EFSAM]. / Pour une organisation transfusionnelle sécuritaire aux risques et coûts maîtrisés : l'expérience APHM-EFSAM.

INTRODUCTION: Blood transfusion safety depends on strict compliance with each step of a process beginning with the order for labile blood products and related immunohematologic testing and ending with administration and follow-up of the receiver. This process is governed by stringent regulatory texts and guidelines. Despite precautions, processing errors are still reported. Analysis of incident reports shows that the most common cause involves patient identification and that most errors occur at two levels, i.e. the entry of patient information and management of multiple regulatory crosschecks and record-keeping using different systems. METHOD: The purpose of this report is to describe the collaborative approach implemented by the Établissement français du Sang Alpes-Méditerranée (EFSAM) and the Assistance publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille (APHM) to secure the blood transfusion process and protect interfaces while simplifying and facilitating exchanges. RESULTS: Close cooperation has had a threefold impact with simplification of administration, improvement of experience feedback, and better management of test ordering. The organization implemented between the two institutions has minimized document redundancy and interfaces between immunohematologic testing and delivery. Collaboration based on experience feedback has improved the level of quality and cost control. CONCLUSION: In the domain of blood transfusion safety, the threshold of 10(-5) has been reached with regard to the risk of ABO errors in the distribution concentrated red cells (CRC). In addition, this collaborative organization has created further opportunity for improvement by deploying new methods to identify simplification measures and by controlling demand and usage.