The management and exploitation of naturally light-emitting bacteria as a flexible analytical tool: A tutorial.

Conventional detection of toxic contaminants on surfaces, in food, and in the environment takes time. Current analytical approaches to chemical detection can be of limited utility due to long detection times, high costs, and the need for a laboratory and trained personnel. A non-specific but easy, rapid, and inexpensive screening test can be useful to quickly classify a specimen as toxic or non toxic, so prompt appropriate measures can be taken, exactly where required. The bioluminescent bacteria-based tests meet all these characteristics. Bioluminescence methods are extremely attractive because of their high sensitivity, speed, ease of implementation, and statistical significance. They are usually sensitive enough to detect the majority of pollutants toxic to humans and mammals. This tutorial provides practical guidelines for isolating, cultivating, and exploiting marine bioluminescent bacteria as a simple and versatile analytical tool. Although mostly applied for aqueous phase sample and organic extracts, the test can also be conducted directly on soil and sediment samples so as to reflect the true toxicity due to the bioavailability fraction. Because tests can be performed with freeze-dried cell preparations, they could make a major contribution to field screening activity. They can be easily conducted in a mobile environmental laboratory and may be adaptable to miniaturized field instruments and field test kits.

Trace analysis of pollutants by use of honeybees, immunoassays, and chemiluminescence detection.

Specific and sensitive analysis to reveal and monitor the wide variety of chemical contaminants polluting all environment compartments, feed, and food is urgently required because of the increasing attention devoted to the environment and health protection. Our research group has been involved in monitoring the presence and distribution of agrochemicals by monitoring beehives distributed throughout the area studied. Honeybees have been used both as biosensors, because the pesticides affect their viability, and as "contaminant collectors" for all environmental pollutants. We focused our research on the development of analytical procedures able to reveal and quantify pesticides in different samples but with a special attention to the complex honeybee matrix. Specific extraction and purification procedures have been developed and some are still under optimization. The analytes of interest were determined by gas or liquid chromatographic methods and by compound-specific or group-specific immunoassays in the ELISA format, the analytical performance of which was improved by introducing luminescence detection. The range of chemiluminescent immunoassays developed was extended to include the determination of completely different pollutants, for example explosives, volatile organic compounds (including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes), and components of plastics, for example bisphenol A. An easier and portable format, a lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) was added to the ELISA format to increase application flexibility in these assays. Aspects of the novelty, the specific characteristics, the analytical performance, and possible future development of the different chromatographic and immunological methods are described and discussed.

A chemiluminescent flow sensing device for determination of choline and phospholipase D activity in biological samples.

A chemiluminescent flow-sensing device for the determination of phospholipase D (PLD) activity and/or choline (Ch) in biological samples using choline oxidase (ChO) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) immobilized on Eupergit C (polymer beads of methacrylamide, N-methylene-bis-methacrylamide, and allyl-glycidyl-ether) was developed. The best results were obtained with immobilized ChO and HRP at a polymer beads wet weight ratio of 16:1. The optimized parameters of the developed sensing device were 56 microM luminol in working solution; sample volume, 60 microliters; flow rate, 0.3 ml/min; and sample throughput, 15/h. The detection limit (3 SD) using a luminescent enhancer was 1.2 microM for Ch, corresponding to 0.167 mIU of PLD activity per milliliter. Without enhancer the values were 3.0 microM and 0.417 mIU, respectively. The Ch recovery varied between 80.4 and 109%. The biological samples quenched the luminescent light to different extents, and this matrix effect was readily overcome by measuring the luminescent signal of added Ch standard. The flow biosensor was used for the determination of PLD in samples of different origin, including rape seeds during maturation.