Gallbladder carcinoma update: multimodality imaging evaluation, staging, and treatment options.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to review the epidemiology, multimodality imaging findings, differential diagnosis, pathologic staging, and current treatment options of gallbladder carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Understanding the characteristic appearances of primary gallbladder carcinoma at multiple imaging modalities can facilitate diagnosis and enable more accurate staging for triage to extended resection or an alternate therapy.

Intimomedial rupture: a new CT finding to distinguish true from false lumen in aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study is to describe a new imaging finding observed on contrast-enhanced MDCT of discontinuity in the intimomedial flap seen with aortic dissection that may identify the level of intimomedial entrance tear and distinguish true from false lumen. CONCLUSION: Direct visualization of an intimomedial rupture on MDCT is a valuable cross-sectional imaging sign indicating direction of the intimomedial entrance tear from true to false lumen in cases of aortic dissection. The presence of this finding enables reliable distinction of the true lumen, where the tear is broad-based and erupts into the false lumen, which receives the evaginating tear. Improved scanning techniques through MDCT may have enabled recognition of this relatively infrequent, yet highly specific, finding.

Prevalence effect in a laboratory environment.

PURPOSE: To measure observer performance at various levels of prevalence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multiobserver multiabnormality receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study to assess the effect of prevalence on observer performance was conducted. Fourteen observers, including eight faculty members, two fellows, and four residents, interpreted 1,632 posteroanterior chest images with five prevalence levels by using a nested study design. Performance comparisons were accomplished by using a multireader multicase approach to assess the effect of prevalence from 28% (69 of 249) to 2% (31 of 1,577) on diagnostic accuracy. The mean times required to review and report a case were analyzed and compared for different levels of prevalence and readers' experience. RESULTS: Area under the ROC curve demonstrated that, with the study experimental conditions, no significant effect could be measured as a function of prevalence (P >.05) for any abnormality, group of cases, or readers. There were no significant differences (P >.05) in the mean times required to review and report cases at different prevalence levels and with different groups of readers. CONCLUSION: The consistency in the results and the size of this study suggest that with laboratory conditions, if a prevalence effect exists, it is quite small in magnitude; hence, it will not likely alter conclusions derived from such studies.

Radiologists' performance in the diagnosis of liver tumors with central scars by using specific CT criteria.

PURPOSE: To determine the performance of radiologists with differing levels of expertise in the diagnosis of the most common types of liver tumors with central scars (ie, focal nodular hyperplasia [FNH], fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC], and large hepatic hemangioma) by using specific computed tomographic (CT) findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of medical records at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center identified patients with a total of 64 liver tumors that had central scars-including 29 cases of FNH, 20 fibrolamellar HCCs, and 15 large (>3.5 cm in diameter) hemangiomas-and with CT scans available for review. Retrospective review of these scans was performed individually by six radiologists who were blinded to the diagnosis, including two faculty abdominal radiologists, one abdominal imaging fellow, and three radiology residents. Individual performance was evaluated by means of receiver operating characteristic analysis, and interobserver agreement was measured by using the Cronbach alpha. Individual CT findings that may allow differentiation of tumor types were identified with the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: CT allowed good to excellent interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of tumor type and in recognition of differential findings among the three types. The individual accuracy of diagnosis was very good, with the average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranging from 0.81 to 0.90. Although the faculty radiologists performed the best, the differences in performance between the subgroups of readers and the levels of confidence in diagnosis were not statistically significant. The diagnosis of fibrolamellar HCC was the most accurate and had the highest sensitivity, followed by FNH and large hemangioma. Clinical and CT findings that were found to be statistically significant in differentiating tumor types were patient age and sex, tumor size larger than 10 cm, width of tumor scars, invasion of vessels, nodular centripetal enhancement, marked hyperattenuation on arterial phase images, lymphadenopathy, heterogeneity, extrahepatic metastases, surface lobulation, calcification, and isoattenuation with liver tissue on portal venous phase images. CONCLUSION: CT allows accurate differentiation of the most common types of liver tumors with central scars, including FNH, fibrolamellar HCC, and large hemangioma.