ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship of interpregnancy interval with maternal and offspring outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective study with data from the Perinatal Information System database of the Latin American Centre for Perinatology and Human Development, Uruguay. SETTING: Latin America, 1990-2009. POPULATION: A cohort of 894 476 women delivering singleton infants. METHODS: During 1990-2009 the Perinatal Information System database of the Latin American Centre for Perinatology identified 894 476 women with defined interpregnancy intervals: i.e. the time elapsed between the date of the previous delivery and the first day of the last normal menstrual period for the index pregnancy. Using the interval 12-23 months as the reference category, multiple logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of the association between various interval lengths and maternal and offspring outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maternal death, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, puerperal infection, fetal death, neonatal death, preterm birth, and low birthweight. RESULTS: In the reference interval there was 0.05% maternal death, 1.00% postpartum haemorrhage, 2.80% pre-eclampsia, 0.15% eclampsia, 0.28% puerperal infection, 3.45% fetal death, 0.68% neonatal death, 12.33% preterm birth, and 9.73% low birthweight. Longer intervals had increased odds of pre-eclampsia (>72 months), fetal death (>108-119 months), and low birthweight (96-107 months). Short intervals of <12 months had increased odds of pre-eclampsia (aOR 0.80; 95% CI 0.76-0.85), neonatal death (aOR 1.18; 95% CI 1.08-1.28), and preterm birth (aOR 1.16; 95% CI 1.11-1.21). Statistically, the interval had no relationship with maternal death, eclampsia, and puerperal infection. CONCLUSIONS: A short interpregnancy interval of <12 months is associated with pre-eclampsia, neonatal mortality, and preterm birth, but not with other maternal or offspring outcomes. Longer intervals of >72 months are associated with pre-eclampsia, fetal death, and low birthweight, but not with other maternal or offspring outcomes. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: A short interpregnancy interval of <12 months is associated with neonatal mortality and preterm birth.
Subject(s)
Birth Intervals , Infant Mortality , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Pregnancy Complications/etiology , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Latin America/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Longitudinal Studies , Odds Ratio , Parity , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy Outcome , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Las nuevas versiones de los programas del Sistema Informático Perinatal han sido preparadas para funcionar conformando una red hospitalaria, regional o nacional según diferentes modelos de complejidad. Esta nueva posibilidad facilita el flujo de información entre niveles para la major atención de la gestante y recién nacido, así como también para la gestión del sector, permitiendo centralizar bases de datos con información actualizada para evaluación y toma de decisiones de manera oportuna...
Subject(s)
Information Systems , Medical Records , Perinatal Care , Maternal-Child Health ServicesABSTRACT
[Extraído do Prólogo]. "O presente manual tem como antecedente o livro “Atendimento Pré-natal e Parto de Baixo Risco”, que foi publicado pelo CLAP em 1995, sendo atualizado em todos os assuntos e com o seu enfoque ampliado, aprofundando os conteúdos dos cuidados pré-gestacionais com um critério de promoção e de prevenção que procura melhorar o estado de saúde da mulher, do seu parceiro e do seu filho/a, com medidas relativamente simples. Incorpora também novos aspectos sobre planejamento familiar com um enfoque de direitos, onde é incluída a anticoncepção de emergência e o conceito de atendimento integral para evitar as oportunidades perdidas e melhorar a eficiência dos contatos do pessoal de saúde com a mulher e seu filho/a" .
Subject(s)
Reproductive Health , Primary Health Care , Infant, Newborn, Diseases , Perinatal Care , Postpartum Hemorrhage , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Maternal and Child Health , Postnatal Care , Prenatal Care , Postpartum Period , AbortionABSTRACT
Gestational age assessed by dorsal spine length (DSL) was compared with that based on date of the last menstrual period (LMP). This study was performed in 70 newborn infants admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit requiring chest radiography, by which dorsal spine length was measured (figure 1). Gestational age ranged from 23 to 42 weeks. Regression analysis were performed on DSL and gestational age. Estimation error was evaluated based on the percentage of agreement in weeks (validity) and the difference in averages between both methods (accuracy) (table I and figure 2). Variations during the first week of life were also studied and no significant differences were found. For infants born at 31 weeks or less, DSL overestimated gestational age in one week. There was no differences between 32 and 36 weeks, and over 37 weeks, underestimation was one week (figure 3). With this correction a table was built estimating gestational age for different DSL; percentage of agreement was 91.4% for +/- 3 weeks (table III). This methodology assists the clinician to evaluate gestational age by an objective method, that does not vary during the first week of life and that can be obtained retrospectively.
Subject(s)
Gestational Age , Spine/anatomy & histology , Embryonic and Fetal Development/physiology , Female , Fetal Growth Retardation/pathology , Fetal Macrosomia/pathology , Humans , Pregnancy , Radiography , Regression Analysis , Spine/diagnostic imaging , Spine/embryologySubject(s)
Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Child Development , Fetal Development , Growth , Maternal and Child HealthABSTRACT
A pesar de que la Historia Clínica es una pieza fundamental para un sistema de información adecuado y para un mejor ardenamiento de los servicios de salud, son notorias las deficiencias de que ésta adolece en la mayoría de los países de Latinoamérica. Como respuesta a ese problema, a inicios de la década de los ï70, el Centro Latinoamericano de Perinatología y Desarrollo Humano (CLAP) con sede en Montevideo, propuso un modelo de Historia Clínica Perinatal (HCPB) adoptado luego por varios países del Continente. Despues de dos años de trabajo, el equipo técnico del CLAP elaboró el Sistema Informático Perinatal. En esta tarea intervinieron obstetras, neonatólogos, sanitaristas, enfermeras, ingenieros de sistemas, bioestadístas y otros profesionales
