Does the Length of the Common Channel as Part of the Total Alimentary Tract Matter? One Year Results from the Multicenter Dutch Common Channel Trial (DUCATI) Comparing Standard Versus Distal Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with Similar Biliopancreatic Bowel Limb Lengths.

PURPOSE: Although the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) is the gold-standard bariatric procedure, it remains uncertain what the optimal bowel limb lengths are to accomplish maximal weight loss while minimizing nutritional deficiencies and related gastro-intestinal complaints. The aim of this randomized controlled multicenter trial is to investigate the effect of significant lengthening of the length of the Roux limb (RL) at the cost of the length of the common channel (CC) while keeping the biliopancreatic limb (BPL) lengths the same on both study arms. METHODS: Four hundred forty-four patients were randomized to receive either a Very Long Roux Limb LRYGB (VLRL-LRYGB) (variable RL length, BPL 60 cm, and CC 100 cm) or a Standard LRYGB (S-LRYGB) (RL 150 cm, BPL 60 cm, and a variable CC length). Results at 1-year follow-up for weight loss, effect on obesity-related comorbid conditions, complications, re-operation rate, malnutrition rate, and re-admission rate were investigated. RESULTS: Weight loss at 1-year showed no significant differences for %EWL (84.3% versus 85.3%, p = 0.72) and %TWL (34.2% versus 33.6%, p = 0.359) comparing VLRL-LRYGB versus S-LRYGB. Malabsorption requiring surgical bowel length adjustment was observed in 1.4% in VLRL-LRYGB group versus 0.9% in S-LRYGB group (p = 0.316). CONCLUSION: Significant lengthening of the RL at the cost of the common channel seems to have no effect on the weight loss at 1-year follow-up, which supports the theory that absorption of nutrients also occurs in the RL. Nevertheless, long-term results of the VLRL-LRYGB have to be awaited to draw final conclusions as part of the discussion towards optimal limb length in LRYGB surgery.

Study protocol of the DUCATI-study: a randomized controlled trial investigating the optimal common channel length in laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obese patients.

BACKGROUND: Morbid obesity has become one of the most frequent chronic medical disorders in Western countries, affecting 1.5-2 % of the Dutch population. Currently, the laparoscopic Roux-Y gastric bypass is considered to be the most effective bariatric treatment option for morbid obesity as it results in adequate weight loss and a significant decrease in comorbidity. Although this technique has been applied for years, the optimal lengths of the three bowel limbs (alimentary limb, biliopancreatic limb, and common channel) in order to achieve maximal percentage excess weight loss with minimal side effects (i.e. malabsorption symptoms), are unknown. As 'normal' sized gastric bypasses achieve an average of 60 - 80 % excess weight loss after one year, one could hypothesize that afferent limb lengths should be longer in order to reduce the common channel length, thereby improving outcome in terms of excess weight loss. The aim of the current study is to investigate the effect of the length of the common channel in gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity. In this randomized controlled trial the very long Roux limb gastric bypass will be compared to the standard gastric bypass, in order to conclude which option is the optimal therapeutic strategy in the morbidly obese patient. METHODS/DESIGN: In this multicentre trial patients will be randomized either to a very long Roux limb gastric bypass with a fixed common channel length of 100 cm, or to a standard gastric bypass with a variable common channel length. The primary objective is to evaluate whether the very long Roux limb gastric bypass is superior in terms of percentage excess weight loss after one year follow-up compared to the standard gastric bypass. Secondary endpoints are quality-of-life, cure /improvement of obesity related comorbidity, complications, malnutrition, re-admission rate, and re-operation rate. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that our proposed distal LRYGB will provide for improved results concerning % EWL with an acceptable rate of (metabolic) complications. Our main point of interest is to determine if the distal LRYGB is a superior alternative to standard LRYGB in terms of percentage excess weight loss and to put more focus on the role of the common channel. Therefore we will perform this randomized controlled trial comparing both techniques, with % EWL as a primary outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CCMO registration number: NL43951.101.13 and Netherlands Trial Registry number: NTR4466.

Is there a relation between number of adjustments and results after gastric banding?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is a standard restrictive bariatric procedure. Previous studies have shown that patients lost to follow-up do worse than patients who remain in follow-up. However, it is unknown if this is purely because of a lack of band adjustments. The aim of this study was to study the relation between number of adjustments and results. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary LAGB from October 2006 until March 2009 were included. The following parameters were collected: demographic characteristics, preoperative and postoperative weight, preoperative and postoperative status of co-morbidities, type of band, short- and long-term complications, reoperations, date, number and volume of adjustments, total amount of inserted volume, and last measured volume. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-four patients underwent primary LAGB. Twelve patients did not attend follow-up visits after 24 months (8.1%). Mean follow-up was 46 months, and excess weight loss, 47%. Eleven patients (8.1%) developed long-term complications, and 12 patients (8.8%) underwent revisional surgery. Patients underwent a mean number of 5 adjustments with a range of 0 to 18. The mean volume of totally inserted milliliters was 8 mL, with a range of 0 to 14 mL. There was a strong positive relation between number of adjustments and weight loss as well as reduction in obesity-related co-morbidities (r = .22; P<.01). There was no significant relation between number of adjustments and complications or revisional surgery. CONCLUSION: There is a strong relation between the number of band adjustments and weight loss, whereas complications and reoperations seem to be independent of the number of adjustments. A continual and lifelong follow-up of LAGB patients, including regular band volume adjustments, is necessary.