Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 2024 Apr 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38605208

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obesity represents a global health crisis, yet a dichotomy is emerging with classification according to the metabolic state into metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) and metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUO). This study aimed to identify distinctive systemic clinical/endocrinological parameters between MHO individuals, employing a comprehensive comparative analysis of 50 biomarkers. Our emphasis was on routine analytes, ensuring cost-effectiveness for widespread use in diagnosing metabolic health. SUBJECTS/METHODS: The study included 182 women diagnosed with obesity referred for bariatric surgery at the Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism Service of São João Hospital and University Centre in Portugal. MUO was defined by the presence of at least one of the following metabolic disorders: diabetes, hypertension, or dyslipidemia. Patients were stratified based on the diagnosis of these pathologies. RESULTS: Significantly divergent health-related parameters were observed between MHO and MUO patients. Notable differences included: albumin (40.1 ± 2.2 vs 40,98 ± 2.6 g/L, p value = 0.017), triglycerides (110.7 ± 51.1 vs 137.57 ± 82.6 mg/dL, p value = 0.008), glucose (99.49 ± 13.0 vs 119.17 ± 38.9 mg/dL, p value < 0.001), glycated hemoglobin (5.58 ± 0.4 vs 6.15 ± 1.0%, p value < 0.001), urea (31.40 ± 10.0 vs 34.61 ± 10.2 mg/dL, p value = 0.014), total calcium (4.64 ± 0.15 vs 4.74 ± 0.17 mEq/L, 1 mEq/L = 1 mg/L, p value < 0.001), ferritin (100.04 ± 129.1 vs 128.55 ± 102.1 ng/mL, p value = 0.005), chloride (104.68 ± 1.5 vs 103.04 ± 2.6 mEq/L, p value < 0.001), prolactin (13.57 ± 6.3 vs 12.47 ± 7.1 ng/mL, p value = 0.041), insulin (20.36 ± 24.4 vs 23.87 ± 19.6 µU/mL, p value = 0.021), c peptide (3.78 ± 1.8 vs 4.28 ± 1.7 ng/mL, p value = 0.003), albumin/creatinine ratio (15.41 ± 31.0 vs 48.12 ± 158.7 mg/g creatinine, p value = 0.015), and whole-body mineral density (1.27 ± 0.1 vs 1.23 ± 0.1 g/cm2, p value = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight potential additional parameters that should be taken into consideration alongside the commonly used biomarkers for classifying metabolic health in women. These include albumin, urea, total calcium, ferritin, chloride, prolactin, c-peptide, albumin-creatinine ratio, and whole-body mineral density. Moreover, our results also suggest that MHO may represent a transitional phase preceding the development of the MUO phenotype.

2.
Obes Surg ; 34(5): 1674-1683, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38523172

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Sarcopenic obesity (SO) is characterised by the confluence of muscle deterioration and high adiposity. When non-surgical interventions prove insufficient, bariatric surgery (BS) becomes the primary approach. This study aimed to address BS effects on SO outcomes 1 year post-surgery among middle-aged women, also considering physical exercise's impact. METHODS: Prospective single-centre study of 140 patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy between November 2019 and December 2022. Participants were categorised into tertiles according to SO's diagnosis and severity (group 1-patients with the most severe SO; group 2-intermediate; group 3-the least severe or without SO), calculated considering the consensus issued by ESPEN and EASO in 2022. Evaluations of clinical and biochemical parameters were conducted before and 12 months after BS, and the variation was used for comparative purposes. Body composition was assessed using bone density scans. Linear regression analysis accounted for both surgery type and baseline body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: Before BS, SO prevalence in the overall sample was 89.3%, decreasing to 2.9% after BS. Group 1 had more body fat mass (56.9 vs 54.8 vs 50.7 kg, p < 0.001), total, trunk and leg fat at baseline and a significantly lower total skeletal muscle mass (47.2 vs 49.4 vs 51.8 kg, p < 0.001). One year post-BS, group 1 presented more weight loss (- 39.8 ± 11.4 kg, p = 0.031), BMI reduction (- 15.9 ± 4.6 kg/m2, p = 0.005) and lost more fat mass (- 32.6 vs - 30.5 vs - 27.9 kg, p = 0.005), but not total skeletal muscle mass (- 5.8 vs - 5.9 vs - 6.8 kg, p = 0.130). Remission rates for comorbidities were substantial among all groups, but more marked among patients within group 1 (type 2 diabetes mellitus 75%, hypertension 47.1% and dyslipidemia 52.8%). Engagement in physical exercise of any kind has increased post-BS (33.1% vs 79.1%). CONCLUSION: Despite concerns about malabsorptive mechanisms potentially worsening muscle loss, patients with the most severe SO undergoing BS lost more fat mass while experiencing the smallest reduction in total skeletal muscle mass. Remission rates for comorbidities following BS were notable among all groups.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Gastric Bypass , Obesity, Morbid , Sarcopenia , Middle Aged , Humans , Female , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Prospective Studies , Sarcopenia/complications , Sarcopenia/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/surgery , Obesity/complications , Obesity/surgery , Weight Loss , Gastrectomy , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...