Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 23(1): 109-19, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20930264

ABSTRACT

A whole genome screen was performed using oligonucleotide microarray analysis on blood from a large clinical cohort of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and control subjects as clinical sample. Blood samples for total RNA extraction were collected in PAXgene tubes, and gene expression analysis performed on the AB1700 Whole Genome Survey Microarrays. When comparing the gene expression of 94 AD patients and 94 cognitive healthy controls, a Jackknife gene selection based method and Partial Least Square Regression (PLSR) was used to develop a disease classifier algorithm, which gives a test score indicating the presence (positive) or absence (negative) of AD. This algorithm, based on 1239 probes, was validated in an independent test set of 63 subjects comprising 31 AD patients, 25 age-matched cognitively healthy controls, and 7 young controls. This algorithm correctly predicted the class of 55/63 (accuracy 87%), including 26/31 AD samples (sensitivity 84%) and 29/32 controls (specificity 91%). The positive likelihood ratio was 8.9 and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) was 0.94. Furthermore, the algorithm also discriminated AD from Parkinson's disease in 24/27 patients (accuracy 89%). We have identified and validated a gene expression signature in blood that classifies AD patients and cognitively healthy controls with high accuracy and show that alterations specific for AD can be detected distant from the primary site of the disease.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/blood , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Gene Expression/physiology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alzheimer Disease/classification , Alzheimer Disease/complications , Case-Control Studies , Cognition Disorders/blood , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Early Diagnosis , Female , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Humans , Male , Mental Status Schedule , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Young Adult
2.
Biom J ; 49(2): 242-58, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17476947

ABSTRACT

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) using microarrays is performed on bacteria in order to test for genomic diversity within various bacterial species. The microarrays used for CGH are based on the genome of a fully sequenced bacterium strain, denoted reference strain. Labelled DNA fragments from a sample strain of interest and from the reference strain are hybridized to the array. Based on the obtained ratio intensities and the total intensities of the signals, each gene is classified as either present (one copy or multiple copies) or divergent (zero copies). In this paper mixture models with different number of components are tted on different combinations of variables and compared with each other. The study shows that mixture models fitted on both the ratio intensities and the total intensities including the replicates for each gene improve, compared to previously published methods, the results for several of the data sets tested. Some summaries of the data sets are proposed as a guide for the choice of model and the choice of number of components. The models are applied on data from CGH experiments with the bacteria Staphylococcus aureus and


Subject(s)
Data Interpretation, Statistical , Genes, Bacterial , Models, Statistical , Nucleic Acid Hybridization/methods , Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Streptococcus pneumoniae/genetics , Analysis of Variance , Genome, Bacterial , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/methods , ROC Curve
3.
Gene Regul Syst Bio ; 1: 43-7, 2007 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19936077

ABSTRACT

In microarray studies several statistical methods have been proposed with the purpose of identifying differentially expressed genes in two varieties. A commonly used method is an analysis of variance model where only the effect of interaction between variety and gene is tested. In this paper we argue that in addition to the interaction effects, the main effect of variety should simultaneously also be taken into account when posting the hypothesis.

4.
Biom J ; 48(2): 255-70, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16708777

ABSTRACT

Comparative genomic hybridizations (CGH) using microarrays are performed with bacteria in order to determine the level of genomic similarity between various strains. The microarrays applied in CGH experiments are constructed on the basis of the genome sequence of one strain, which is used as a control, or reference, in each experiment. A strain being compared with the known strain is called the unknown strain. The ratios of fluorescent intensities obtained from the spots on the microarrays can be used to determine which genes are divergent in the unknown strain, as well as to predict the copy number of actual genes in the unknown strain. In this paper, we focus on the prediction of gene copy number based on data from CGH experiments. We assumed a linear connection between the log2 of the copy number and the observed log2-ratios, then predictors based on the factor analysis model and the linear random model were proposed in an attempt to identify the copy numbers. These predictors were compared to using the ratio of the intensities directly. Simulations indicated that the proposed predictors improved the prediction of the copy number in most situations. The predictors were applied on CGH data obtained from experiments with Enterococcus faecalis strains in order to determine copy number of relevant genes in five different strains.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Chromosome Mapping/methods , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Gene Dosage/genetics , Genome, Bacterial/genetics , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/methods , Models, Genetic , Computer Simulation , Models, Statistical , Regression Analysis
5.
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol ; 4: Article10, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16646827

ABSTRACT

Gene expression microarray experiments generate data sets with multiple missing expression values. In some cases, analysis of gene expression requires a complete matrix as input. Either genes with missing values can be removed, or the missing values can be replaced using prediction. We propose six imputation methods. A comparative study of the methods was performed on data from mice and data from the bacterium Enterococcus faecalis, and a linear mixed model was used to test for differences between the methods. The study showed that different methods' capability to predict is dependent on the data, hence the ideal choice of method and number of components are different for each data set. For data with correlation structure methods based on K-nearest neighbours seemed to be best, while for data without correlation structure using the average of the gene was to be preferred.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...