ABSTRACT
Serious adverse events (serious AEs) following the therapeutic use of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BoNT-A) are infrequent. Children with pediatric spasticity often have comorbidities that can cloud causation around an adverse event (AE). If a serious AE occurs, clear documentation of information sharing and informed consent as well as the provider-patient relationship are critical to minimizing litigation risks. Reviewing the litigation that has occurred following BoNT-A for pediatric spasticity can offer insight into how providers' perspectives regarding this intervention may differ from those of the public who might serve as jurists. This article offers suggestions for content sharing during the consent process to optimize patient understanding about potential adverse events.
Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins, Type A , Cerebral Palsy , Neuromuscular Agents , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/adverse effects , Cerebral Palsy/complications , Cerebral Palsy/drug therapy , Child , Humans , Injections, Intramuscular , Muscle Spasticity/drug therapy , Neuromuscular Agents/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic hastened the need for graduate medical education (GME) innovation, resulting in the creation of multiple pediatric rehabilitation medicine (PRM) e-learning initiatives. There has been a paucity of data regarding trainee perceptions regarding quickly developed new methods of learning during the pandemic. This study explored PRM trainee perceptions of e-learning and effects of the pandemic on education. METHODS: Questionnaire study with data collected via REDCap. RESULTS: Greater than half of PRM trainees (56.6%, 30/53) responded. Most respondents reported that the virtual lectures series (79.3%), journal club (78.9%), and virtual arts initiatives (75.0%) were valuable to their education. Common benefits noted included access to subject experts, networking, lecture recording, and location flexibility. Common concerns included lack of protected time, virtual platform fatigue, and decreased engagement. Most respondents were not redeployed. Relative to before the pandemic, less satisfaction with clinical education (70.0%) and greater satisfaction with non-clinical education (60.0%) was reported. The majority of graduating trainees felt positively (83.3%) and 16.7% were neutral regarding confidence to graduate. CONCLUSION: Trainees perceived national e-learning as valuable to their education, especially due to the access to expert leaders around the nation. Future work should explore ways to overcome barriers and optimize benefits of GME and PRM e-learning.
