ABSTRACT
Background: The optimal treatment of patients with severe symptomatic aortic regurgitation (AR) is state-of-the-art surgery. Asymptomatic patients with advanced left ventricular (LV) dilatation and/or impaired ejection fraction should undergo surgical treatment, but there is no guidelines consensus on cut-off values for this recommendation. Multimodality imaging has brought new tools for the accurate selection of asymptomatic patients at risk of early clinical deterioration, however, prospective and randomized data are pending. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived AR quantification along with LV remodeling assessment appears to be the most accurate tool for a selection of such patients at risk. Trial design: The objective of our prospective and multicenter study is to determine whether patients at risk of early clinical deterioration as per CMR assessment will benefit from early surgical treatment. The study is designed as a superiority trial to demonstrate that early surgical treatment is safe and more effective than the standard treatment. A total of 217 asymptomatic patients with severe AR, but without current guidelines-based surgical indication, will be enrolled across all centers. We expect 24 % of patients identified as high clinical risk and therefore eligible for 1:1 randomization to early surgical treatment within 3 months or a watchful waiting strategy. Follow-up will be annual. We expect a complete restoration of LV size and function along with improved quality of life and physical performance in a short-term follow-up of 12 months. The primary endpoint will be a composite safety and efficacy with all criteria mandatory: 15 % or larger reduction of baseline CMR-derived LV end-diastolic volume index, LV ejection fraction >50 %, and no major adverse cardiovascular events. The annual follow-up will continue for a minimum of 4 years until the required number of endpoints is achieved to show a statistically significant difference in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in early surgically treated patients. Conclusion: The ELEANOR trial is the first multicenter randomized controlled study to compare early surgical treatment with a watchful waiting strategy in asymptomatic patients with chronic severe AR at high risk of early clinical deterioration as per CMR assessment but without guidelines-based indications for surgical treatment.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: Antiviral drugs are considered as potentially cardiotoxic, due to prolongation of QT interval which may affect incidence of severe ventricular arrhythmias. The main aim of this retrospective study was to assess the influence of treatment by three antiviral drugs on QT interval and to find patients who are at an increased risk of developing malignant ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: The study included 23 patients (14 men, 9 women) who were treated with a combination of interferon alpha, ribavirin, and an NS3/4A protease inhibitor. The parameters from the 12 leads electrocardiograms were evaluated before treatment, and then 3 ± 1 and 6 ± 1 months after treatment. RESULTS: Heart rate (HR) 69 ± 12 / min and corrected QT interval (QTc) 412 ± 35 ms were obtained before the treatment and there was not observed a significant prolongation of intervals after 3 months (HR 72 ± 11 / min, QTc 412 ± 33 ms) and after 6 months (HR 64 ± 12 / min, QTc 405 ± 28 ms) respectively. In total QTc interval was prolonged from the baseline in 53% and in 43% of the patients 3 months respectively 6 months after treatment. A QTc prolongation over of 450 ms and new treatment-related repolarization change was noted in 1 (4%) patient. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that a combination therapy of 3 antiviral drugs does not significantly prolong the QTc interval and does not cause severe pathological changes on the ECG. Patients undergoing this treatment are not at risk of developing heart disease as an undesirable side effect.
