Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Int J Eat Disord ; 56(9): 1826-1831, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37309255

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The new ICD-11 eating disorders (ED) guidelines are similar to the DSM-5 criteria. One difference to the DSM-5 is the inclusion of subjective binges in the definition of bulimia nervosa (BN) and binge-eating disorder (BED). The aim of this study was to identify differences between the ICD-11 guidelines and DSM-5 ED criteria, which could impact access to medical care and early treatment. METHOD: Data of 3863 ED inpatients who completed the Munich Eating and Feeding Disorder Questionnaire were analyzed using standardized diagnostic algorithms for DSM-5 and ICD-11. RESULTS: Agreement of diagnoses was high (Krippendorff's α = .88, 95% CI [.86, .89]) for anorexia nervosa (AN; 98.9%), BN (97.2%) and BED (100%), and lower for other feeding and eating disorders (OFED; 75.2%). Of the 721 patients with a DSM-5 OFED, 19.8% were diagnosed with AN, BN or BED by the ICD-11 diagnostic algorithm, reducing the number of OFED diagnoses. One-hundred and twenty-one patients received an ICD-11 diagnosis of BN or BED because of subjective binges. DISCUSSION: For over 90% of patients, applying either DSM-5 or ICD-11 diagnostic criteria/guidelines resulted in the same full-threshold ED diagnosis. Sub-threshold and feeding disorders exhibited a discrepancy of 25%. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: For about 98% of inpatients, the ICD-11 and DSM-5 agree on the same specified eating disorder diagnosis. This is important when comparing diagnoses made by different diagnostic systems. Including subjective binges in the definition of bulimia nervosa and binge-eating disorder contributes to improved ED diagnoses. Clarifying the wording of diagnostic criteria at several places could further increase this agreement.


Subject(s)
Anorexia Nervosa , Binge-Eating Disorder , Bulimia Nervosa , Feeding and Eating Disorders , Humans , International Classification of Diseases , Feeding and Eating Disorders/diagnosis , Binge-Eating Disorder/diagnosis , Bulimia Nervosa/diagnosis , Anorexia Nervosa/diagnosis , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Int J Eat Disord ; 50(9): 1018-1030, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28644530

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of the long-term outcome of anorexia nervosa (AN) in a very large sample of inpatients (N = 1,693) and identification of predictors for poor outcome. METHOD: Over 25 years (mean 10 years), consecutively admitted inpatients of a specialized hospital were followed. A subsample of 112 patients with 20-year follow-up was defined. Bivariate comparisons and logistic regression analysis identified risk factors of poor outcome. RESULTS: Body mass index (BMI) increased during the follow-up period. Eating behavior as well as general psychopathology improved but did not reach the level of healthy controls. Remission was found in 30% (total sample) and in 40% (20-year follow-up subsample). Crossover from AN to binge-eating disorder or obesity was rare. The predictors of a negative course of illness included lower BMI at admission; a higher score on the Eating Disorder Inventory Maturity Fears subscale at admission; fewer follow-up years; and higher age at admission. The main diagnostic crossover occurred from AN to eating disorder not otherwise specified. Motherhood was related to better outcome. DISCUSSION: Many patients with very severe AN recover from their illness but AN also shows considerable long-term negative consequences. Over long time periods, survivors show improvement but better treatments for severe cases are still needed. Predictors of outcome included symptom severity, chronicity, and length of follow-up but not psychiatric comorbidity.


Subject(s)
Anorexia Nervosa/psychology , Adult , Anorexia Nervosa/mortality , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Long Term Adverse Effects , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
Int J Eat Disord ; 49(4): 391-401, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26767344

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To report on long-term mortality in anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), binge eating disorder (BED), and eating disorder not otherwise specified (ED-NOS), causes of death, and predictors of early death. METHOD: A large sample of consecutively admitted inpatients (N = 5,839) was followed-up on vital status through the German civil registry office. Of these patients 1,639 were treated for AN, 1,930 for BN, 363 for BED, and 1,907 for ED-NOS. Data from the main inpatient hospital treatment were applied to bivariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses on survival time from onset of eating disorder to death or end of observation. Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) were computed matched for age, gender, and person-years. RESULTS: SMR were 5.35 for AN, 1.49 for BN, 1.50 for BED, 2.39 for narrowly defined ED-NOS, and 1.70 for widely defined ED-NOS. Patients with AN died earlier than patients with BN, BED, or ED-NOS who did not differ. A diagnosis of AN, chronicity, later age of onset, not living in a relationship, and an irregular type of discharge from index inpatient treatment were major predictors of a shorter time to death. Suicidality was a univariate predictor of a shorter time to death in BN only. AN patients mostly died from natural causes related to their eating disorder. DISCUSSION: Mortality in AN is excessive and considerably higher than in BN, BED, and ED-NOS.


Subject(s)
Anorexia Nervosa/mortality , Binge-Eating Disorder/mortality , Bulimia Nervosa/mortality , Adult , Age of Onset , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
4.
Eur Eat Disord Rev ; 23(3): 229-40, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25677676

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the article is to report on the psychometric properties of a newly developed self-rating scale (Munich Eating and Feeding Disorder Questionnaire) for the detailed assessment of eating and feeding disorders on the basis of the DSM-5 criteria. The questionnaire aims at developing a comprehensive assessment of eating disorder symptoms suitable for severity ratings with regard to total scale and subscales, for deriving eating disorder diagnoses according to DSM-5 and ICD-10 and for measuring (intervention induced) changes over time. METHODS: Items were formulated by clinical experts and entered into factor analysis in two separate samples of eating-disordered inpatients. Additionally, 47 clinical and 547 community control participants were assessed. Internal consistency and sensitivity to change over time are also reported. RESULTS: Three subscales were identified covering 'preoccupation with figure and weight', 'bingeing and vomiting' and 'inappropriate compensatory behaviour' for current and past state. Test-retest reliability for the three subscales ranged between .95 and .98 (current status). A high sensitivity to change during inpatient treatment from admission to discharge was expressed in high effect sizes; for the total score (current status) for all eating disorders, the effect size was 1.70. Effect sizes for anorexia nervosa were mostly lower than those for bulimia nervosa. Clinical and community controls obtained significantly lower scores compared with eating-disordered patients. CONCLUSION: This new DSM-5 questionnaire shows satisfying psychometric properties and is well suited for the rating of eating disorder severity in clinical practice and research.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , International Classification of Diseases , Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Adult , Anorexia Nervosa/diagnosis , Binge-Eating Disorder , Body Weight , Bulimia Nervosa/diagnosis , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Feeding and Eating Disorders/classification , Feeding and Eating Disorders/diagnosis , Female , Germany , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/psychology , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Young Adult
5.
J Eat Disord ; 1: 23, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24999404

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To study the longer term effects of an internet-based CBT intervention for relapse prevention (RP) in anorexia nervosa. METHODS: 210 women randomized to the RP intervention group (full and partial completers) or the control group were assessed for eating and general psychopathology. Multiple regression analysis identified predictors of favorable course concerning Body Mass Index (BMI). Logistic regression analysis identified predictors of adherence to the RP program. RESULTS: Most variables assessed showed more improvement for the RP than for the control group. However, only some scales reached statistical significance (bulimic behavior and menstrual function, assessed by expert interviewers blind to treatment condition). Very good results (BMI) were seen for the subgroup of "full completers" who participated in all nine monthly RP internet-based intervention sessions. "Partial completers" and controls (the latter non-significantly) underwent more weeks of inpatient treatment during the study period than "full completers", indicating better health and less need for additional treatment among the "full completers". Main long-term predictors for favorable course were adherence to RP, more spontaneity, and more ineffectiveness. Main predictors of good adherence to RP were remission from lifetime mood and lifetime anxiety disorder, a shorter duration of eating disorder, and additional inpatient treatment during RP. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the high chronicity of AN, internet-based relapse prevention following intensive treatment appears to be promising.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...