Does size matter? Comparison of body temperature and activity of free-living Arabian oryx (Oryx leucoryx) and the smaller Arabian sand gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa marica) in the Saudi desert.

Heterothermy, a variability in body temperature beyond the normal limits of homeothermy, is widely viewed as a key adaptation of arid-adapted ungulates. However, desert ungulates with a small body mass, i.e. a relatively large surface area-to-volume ratio and a small thermal inertia, are theoretically less likely to employ adaptive heterothermy than are larger ungulates. We measured body temperature and activity patterns, using implanted data loggers, in free-ranging Arabian oryx (Oryx leucoryx, ±70 kg) and the smaller Arabian sand gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa marica, ±15 kg) inhabiting the same Arabian desert environment, at the same time. Compared to oryx, sand gazelle had higher mean daily body temperatures (F(1,6) = 47.3, P = 0.0005), higher minimum daily body temperatures (F(1,6) = 42.6, P = 0.0006) and higher maximum daily body temperatures (F(1,6) = 11.0, P = 0.02). Despite these differences, both species responded similarly to changes in environmental conditions. As predicted for adaptive heterothermy, maximum daily body temperature increased (F(1,6) = 84.0, P < 0.0001), minimum daily body temperature decreased (F(1,6) = 92.2, P < 0.0001), and daily body temperature amplitude increased (F(1,6) = 97.6, P < 0.0001) as conditions got progressively hotter and drier. There were no species differences in activity levels, however, both gazelle and oryx showed a biphasic or crepuscular rhythm during the warm wet season but shifted to a more nocturnal rhythm during the hot dry season. Activity was attenuated during the heat of the day at times when both species selected cool microclimates. These two species of Arabian ungulates employ heterothermy, cathemerality and shade seeking very similarly to survive the extreme, arid conditions of Arabian deserts, despite their size difference.

Variation in the daily rhythm of body temperature of free-living Arabian oryx (Oryx leucoryx): does water limitation drive heterothermy?

Heterothermy, a variability in body temperature beyond the limits of homeothermy, has been advanced as a key adaptation of Arabian oryx (Oryx leucoryx) to their arid-zone life. We measured body temperature using implanted data loggers, for a 1-year period, in five oryx free-living in the deserts of Saudi Arabia. As predicted for adaptive heterothermy, during hot months compared to cooler months, not only were maximum daily body temperatures higher (41.1 ± 0.3 vs. 39.7 ± 0.1°C, P = 0.0002) but minimum daily body temperatures also were lower (36.1 ± 0.3 vs. 36.8 ± 0.2°C, P = 0.04), resulting in a larger daily amplitude of the body temperature rhythm (5.0 ± 0.5 vs. 2.9 ± 0.2°C, P = 0.0007), while mean daily body temperature rose by only 0.4°C. The maximum daily amplitude of the body temperature rhythm reached 7.7°C for two of our oryx during the hot-dry period, the largest amplitude ever recorded for a large mammal. Body temperature variability was influenced not only by ambient temperature but also water availability, with oryx displaying larger daily amplitudes of the body temperature rhythm during warm-dry months compared to warm-wet months (3.6 ± 0.6 vs. 2.3 ± 0.3°C, P = 0.005), even though ambient temperatures were the same. Free-living Arabian oryx therefore employ heterothermy greater than that recorded in any other large mammal, but water limitation, rather than high ambient temperature, seems to be the primary driver of this heterothermy.

Tramadol is more effective than morphine and amitriptyline against ischaemic pain but not thermal pain in rats.

The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacies of tramadol, which acts on opioid receptors and inhibits monoamine reuptake, to amitriptyline, a monoamine reuptake inhibitor as well as to morphine, an opioid receptor agonist. We compared the motor function impairment and response latencies to noxious thermal and noxious ischaemic challenges after tramadol administration to those after morphine and after amitriptyline administration. We injected Sprague-Dawley rats (i.p.) with either tramadol (1, 5, 15 and 25 mg kg(-1)), morphine (0.01, 0.1, 1 and 5 mg kg(-1)) or amitriptyline (1, 3 and 10 mg kg(-1)) and a control injection of saline (100 microl). We measured the tail flick latency to a noxious thermal challenge after tail immersion in a 49 degrees C water bath and response latency to noxious ischaemia, induced by a tourniquet inflated at the base of the tail, was recorded as ischaemic escape latency. In a separate group of rats, we assessed motor function by placing the rats on a rotarod, rotating at 25 rpm, for a maximum of 30 min after drug administration. We recorded the time to the rat's third fall from the rotarod. Tramadol (15 mg kg(-1)) produced a 107% increase in response latency from pre-injection value as did 25 mg kg(-1) tramadol (79%), 1 mg kg(-1) morphine (85%), 5 mg kg(-1) morphine (138%) and 10 mg kg(-1) amitriptyline (46%) against a noxious thermal challenge. The escape latency against noxious ischaemia after morphine and amitriptyline administration did not change, despite an increase in dose, while increasing doses of tramadol (1-25 mg kg(-1)) provided increasing analgesia against noxious ischaemia. Significant impairment to motor function occurred after morphine (5 mg kg(-1)), tramadol (15 mg kg(-1)) and amitriptyline (10 mg kg(-1)) administration, with only 11, 50 and 38% of animals, respectively, completing the rotarod trial, compared to 100% completion after saline administration. As previously demonstrated, morphine was more potent than tramadol for the relief of thermal pain but tramadol may be a more beneficial drug for relieving severe ischaemic pain.