Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 11(3): 252-8, 1999 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10353357

ABSTRACT

Filamentous, gram-negative bacteria morphologically similar to cilia-associated respiratory (CAR) bacillus of rodents and rabbits were isolated from the tracheas of 5 pigs and 4 calves. All pigs but none of the calves had histologic lesions of chronic tracheitis. In silver-stained histologic sections, CAR bacilli were adhered to the tracheal epithelium of each pig but were not found in the calves. Like CAR bacillus of rats, the bacteria displayed gliding motility and grew only in cell culture or cell culture medium supplemented with fetal serum. Initially, all isolates were contaminated by Mycoplasma spp. This contamination was eliminated from 4 pig isolates by limiting dilutions, and mycoplasma-free isolates were used to intranasally inoculate gnotobiotic pigs and CAR bacillus-free mice and rats and to immunize guinea pigs. The gnotobiotic pigs remained healthy, and when they were necropsied 4 and 7 weeks after infection no macroscopic or microscopic lesions were found in the respiratory tract. However, CAR bacillus was isolated at both times from the nasal cavities and tracheas of inoculated pigs, and the ciliated tracheal epithelium of infected pigs necropsied 7 weeks after infection was colonized by low numbers of CAR bacillus-like bacteria. The rats and mice remained healthy through week 12 postinoculation, and evidence of short- or long-term colonization was not detected by histologic examination or culture. When used as primary antibody for immunohistochemical staining, sera from guinea pigs immunized with pig CAR bacillus specifically stained CAR bacilli colonizing the respiratory epithelium of naturally infected pigs, whereas sera collected prior to immunization failed to react with the bacteria. These results indicate that CAR bacilli are unlikely to be primary pathogens of pigs or cattle and that rodents do not act as reservoirs.


Subject(s)
Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/veterinary , Respiratory Tract Infections/veterinary , Animals , Bacillus/immunology , Bacillus/pathogenicity , Cattle , Cilia/microbiology , Gram-Negative Bacteria/pathogenicity , Guinea Pigs , Immunohistochemistry , Mice , Rabbits , Rats , Respiratory Tract Infections/immunology , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Swine , Trachea/microbiology , Vaccination/veterinary
3.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 380: 221-8, 1995.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8830483

ABSTRACT

Feline Infectious Peritonitis Virus (FIPV) is a coronavirus that induces an often fatal, systemic infection in cats. Various vaccines designed to prevent FIPV infection have been shown to exacerbate the disease, probably due to immune enhancement mediated by virus-specific immunoglobulins against the outer envelope (S) protein. An effective vaccine would be one that induces cell-mediated immunity without disease enhancing antibodies. In this report, we describe the use of a recombinant raccoon poxvirus that expresses the gene encoding the nucleocapsid protein of FIPV (rRCNV-FIPV N) as an effective vaccine against FIPV-induced disease. Cats were parenterally or orally vaccinated twice, three weeks apart. Cats were then orally challenged with Feline Enteric Coronavirus (FECV), which induces a subclinical infection that can cause enhancement of subsequent FIPV infection. Three weeks later, cats were orally challenged with FIPV. The FIPV challenge induced a fatal infection in 4/5 (80%) of the controls. On the other hand, all five cats vaccinated subcutaneously with rRCNV-FIPV N showed no signs of disease after challenge with FIPV. Four of the five subcutaneous vaccinates survived an additional FIPV challenge. Vaccination with rRCNV-FIPV N induced serum IgG antibody responses to FIPV nucleocapsid protein, but few, if any, FIPV neutralizing antibodies. In contrast to the controls, protected vaccinates maintained low FIPV serum neutralizing antibody titers after FIPV challenge. This suggests that the protective immune response involves a mechanism other than humoral immunity consisting of FIPV neutralizing antibodies.


Subject(s)
Capsid/immunology , Coronavirus, Feline/immunology , Feline Infectious Peritonitis/immunology , Poxviridae/immunology , Vaccines, Synthetic , Viral Core Proteins/immunology , Viral Vaccines , Animals , Capsid/biosynthesis , Capsid/genetics , Cats , Cell Line , Chlorocebus aethiops , Cloning, Molecular , Coronavirus, Feline/genetics , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Feline Infectious Peritonitis/prevention & control , Genes, Viral , Poxviridae/genetics , Raccoons , Time Factors , Vaccination , Vero Cells , Viral Core Proteins/biosynthesis , Viral Core Proteins/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...