Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak ; 32(10): 1308-1312, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36205276

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of intolerance to Methotrexate (MTX) in patients with inflammatory arthritis by using MTX intolerance severity score, and evaluate the effects of Ondansetron in reducing MTX intolerance. STUDY DESIGN: Interventional study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Rheumatology clinic, Combined Military Hospital (CMH), Lahore, from 1st November 2021 to 30th April 2022. METHODOLOGY: Patients with inflammatory arthritis taking methotrexate regularly for >3 months participated in the study. The patients' age, gender, education level, marital status and smoking history were documented. The disease duration and disease activity was also recorded. Dose/duration/route/frequency and timing of MTX were noted. MTX intolerance was calculated with the use of the Methotrexate intolerance severity score (MISS) questionnaire. Those MTX intolerant patients who reported nausea and vomiting were prescribed ondansetron along with MTX and were followed up for the next 3 consecutive months. RESULTS: Out of 181 patients, 48(26.5%) showed methotrexate intolerance. The predominant symptom was nausea after taking MTX reported in 93.8% of the MTX intolerant patients followed by behavioural symptoms including restlessness and irritability reported among 79% and 77% of intolerant patients respectively. Those methotrexate intolerant patients who mainly had complaints of nausea and vomiting were started on ondansetron on the day of methotrexate and showed a significant reduction in the median of MISS score in the following two consecutive months (p <0.05) while at 3 months the median did not show further reduction as compared to second month (p=0.12). CONCLUSION: Ondansetron prescribed along with methotrexate in patients having complaints of nausea and vomiting with MTX, reduces the intolerance significantly. KEY WORDS: Rheumatoid arthritis, Methotrexate, Ondansetron, Nausea, Arthritis juvenile.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Juvenile , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Humans , Methotrexate/adverse effects , Nausea/chemically induced , Ondansetron/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Vomiting/chemically induced , Vomiting/drug therapy
2.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 15(4): 530-537, 2021 04 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33956653

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Typhoid fever remains a problem in developing countries, including Pakistan. The emergence of multidrug-resistant and, since 2016, of extensively drug-resistant cases is a continuous challenge for health care workers. The COVID-19 pandemic is making management more difficult. METHODOLOGY: In the present study, a total of 52 confirmed cases of typhoid have been studied during 2019. Detailed clinical features, complications and, lab findings were studied. Typhoid culture and sensitivity were recorded and patients were treated accordingly. Patients were asked about risk factors to aim at informing prevention. RESULTS: Out of the 52 having blood culture positive for Salmonella Typhi 47 (90.4%) and Salmonella Paratyphi 5 (9.6%), 4 (7.7%) were sensitive to first-line (Non-resistant), 11 (21.2%) MDR and 37 (71.2%) patient were XDR. One case was resistant to azithromycin. Nausea, vomiting or, abdominal pain was present in 12 (23%), abdominal distension present in 9 (17.3%), abdominal tenderness in 8 (15.4%), hepatomegaly in 10 (19.2%) and, splenomegaly in 22 (42.3%).There were ultrasound abnormalities in 58% of patients and GI complications in 19% of patients. No significant difference was found in clinical findings and complications between resistant and non-resistant cases. Only 23-27% of patients were aware of typhoid prevention and vaccination measures. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing prevalence of resistance and higher degree of complications seen in typhoid fever raises the concern further about prevention and effective infection management in the community as well as clinical settings. Moreover, judicial use of antibiotics is much needed in developing countries like Pakistan.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Typhoid Fever/drug therapy , Typhoid Fever/etiology , Abdomen/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/drug effects , Female , Humans , Male , Pakistan , Salmonella paratyphi A/drug effects , Salmonella typhi/drug effects , Typhoid Fever/diagnostic imaging
3.
Pak J Med Sci ; 37(1): 175-179, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33437272

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the knowledge and confidence of junior doctors and non-specialists in examining and making a diagnosis of patients with musculoskeletal (MSK) diseases. METHODS: This was a Cross-sectional study of 121 doctors working in medical clinics at a tertiary hospital between October and December 2019. Data were collected using a questionnaire. Doctor's awareness regarding different MSK examination methods including gait, arms, leg, spine (GALS), pediatric gait, arms, leg, spine (pGALS) and regional examination of musculoskeletal system (REMS) was noted. Undergraduate teaching of these methods and use in their daily practice was surveyed. RESULTS: Majority of the doctors lacked awareness about different MSK examination techniques. Awareness about GALS, REMS and pGALS was 44.6%, 59.5% and 18.2% respectively. There was significant correlation of GALS/REMS awareness with the undergraduate teaching and doctor's clinical experience (p-value <0.05). Confidence level of doctors in diagnosing patients with adult MSK pathologies was 55%. Only few doctors were satisfied with their musculoskeletal education (29%). CONCLUSION: The GALS examination is a useful screening tool for junior doctors and non-specialists in a direct access setting to rule out musculoskeletal problems.

4.
Cureus ; 12(10): e11055, 2020 Oct 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33224651

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Typhoid fever is a major health problem in developing countries. Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) typhoid is an emerging threat to world health. The objectives of this study were to report our blood culture proven patients having XDR typhoid and compare the rate of gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatobiliary manifestations and complications of antimicrobial sensitive and resistant strains. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective observational study was carried out at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan, from January 2019 till August 2020 on all consecutive blood culture proven patients of Salmonella typhi. A total of 57 cases of Salmonella were identified, of which 10 were nonresistant, seven multi drug-resistant (MDR), 39 extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and one was extended-spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) positive. Alarmingly, one of the S. typhi isolate in addition to the first line drugs, was also resistant to azithromycin. Patients were treated with antibiotics according to antimicrobial susceptibility of the Salmonella in accordance with the World Health Organization (WHO) and Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Society of Pakistan (MMIDSP) guidelines and GI and hepatobiliary complications were recorded. RESULTS: Overall rate of complications was low. Some 10% (1/10) with nonresistant typhoid, 14% (1/7) with MDR, and 15% (6/39) of our patients with XDR typhoid fever had abdominal tenderness (p=0.95). None of the patients had GI bleeding, abdominal abscess, or peritonitis. Some 20% (2/10) patients with nonresistant typhoid, 29% (2/7) with MDR, and 18% (7/39) with XDR typhoid developed acute hepatitis, with greater than three times elevation of liver transaminases. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of hepatitis between these groups (p=0.98). Interestingly, one of our patients with XDR typhoid also developed cholestatic hepatitis. CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in GI and hepatobiliary complications amongst antimicrobial sensitive and resistant strains of typhoid. However, emergence of resistant strains calls for focus on prevention and judicious use of antimicrobials.

5.
Cureus ; 12(8): e10016, 2020 Aug 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32983712

ABSTRACT

Introduction Hepatorenal syndrome is the third most common cause of admissions among patients with liver cirrhosis and has a high mortality rate. It is a progressive deterioration of renal function in a patient with acute or chronic liver failure. The only definite curative treatment of choice for hepatorenal syndrome is liver transplantation. This study aimed to determine the frequency of hepatorenal syndrome among patients with liver cirrhosis and to determine its outcome after treatment. Patients and Methods This case series prospective study was conducted at the Department of Medicine, CMH Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry, Pakistan, from January 2019 to December 2019. The study included 136 patients of cirrhosis who were identified and worked up for hepatorenal syndrome. The patients with liver cirrhosis diagnosed as having hepatorenal syndrome were given treatment comprising injection terlipressin 2 mg four times a day and injection Haemaccel twice a day for two weeks, and after that the outcome was measured with a follow-up of six weeks. Results A total of 136 patients of cirrhosis were included in the study. Of the patients, 14 (10.3%) were diagnosed as suffering from hepatorenal syndrome. These diagnosed cases were given treatment for two weeks. Three (21.4%) of the patients having hepatorenal syndrome did not show any response, two (14.3%) patients recovered partially, four (28.6%) patients recovered fully, and four (28.6%) expired within one month of the treatment. One (7.14%) patient was referred during the treatment for liver transplant. Conclusions Hepatorenal syndrome is a common complication of cirrhosis. The treatment of systemic vasoconstrictors for hepatorenal syndrome proved to be effective in our study and should be the first priority for treating hepatorenal syndrome especially in places like Pakistan where liver transplantation is not that easily available.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...