Long-term stability of Angle Class II, division 1 malocclusions with successful occlusal results at end of active treatment.

The purpose of this study was to examine long-term stability of Angle Class II, Division 1 malocclusions with successful occlusal results at the end of active appliance therapy, search for predictors of relapse, and look for characteristics associated with successful treatment. Records taken before and after treatment and a mean of 14.0 years postretention of adolescent patients treated for a significant Angle Class II, Division 1 malocclusion both with and without tooth extraction were evaluated. The sample was limited to successfully treated cases as judged by subjective evaluation of intercuspation and incisor occlusion of posttreatment study models and included 78 patients. Cephalometric characteristics or postretention occlusion was not considered in sample selection. The mode response was no change postretention for molar, premolar, and canine relationships and relapse of 0.5 mm for overjet and overbite. Maximum relapse was 3.5 mm for molar, premolar, and canine relationship, 3 mm for overjet, and 4.5 mm for overbite. Stepwise backward multiple regression analyses revealed no associations between either pretreatment characteristics or skeletal and dental treatment changes and relapse of overjet. However, relapse of overjet was associated with relapse of molar, premolar, and canine relationships, postretention increase in overbite, postretention proclination of maxillary incisors, and postretention retroclination of mandibular incisors. Active treatment changes included redirection or inhibition of maxillary growth and retraction of maxillary incisors. Mandibular incremental growth was favorable both during and after treatment. It was concluded that successful correction of Angle Class II, Division 1 malocclusions through differential growth adaptation and tooth movement appears to be very stable.

Joint custody: historical, legal, and clinical perspectives with emphasis on the situation in Canada.

The search for ways to mitigate the effects of family breakdown on parents and children includes legislative and clinical efforts which to some extent influence each other. In the past year much public interest has been aroused in Canada, and particularly in Ontario, in the issue of legislative changes which would make joint custody the usual or "preferred" legal disposition of custody cases. This paper provides a discussion of the legislated preference, or "rebutable presumption" of joint custody from a historical, legal and clinical point of view. Definition and elaboration of what joint custody is from the legal and practical perspectives is provided with an emphasis on Canadian laws and practice. The legal rights of the non-custodial parent are explained, and relevant case law is highlighted. The relationship between joint custody, support orders and relitigation rates are elaborated. Following this is a critical overview of the empirical research on joint custody as it relates to the adjustment of children and parent satisfaction is included. It is concluded that while there is little question that shared parenting can be beneficial to children, the enthusiasm of legislators for joint custody has not been supported by empirical data. It is necessary to examine under what circumstances and for which kinds of parents and children joint custody might be beneficial since it is unlikely that one solution will fit the needs of all families and all stages of family life.

Children's adjustment during custody/access disputes: relation to custody arrangement, gender and age of child.

The adjustment of pre-school and latency age children, at the time of a custody/access dispute between their parents, was studied in relation to the children's age, sex and whether they were living with a parent of the same or the opposite-sex. Few adjustment problems were noted; however, older children and boys were more vulnerable. Sex of custodial parent did not predict children's adjustment.