GFR measurement in patients with CKD: Performance and feasibility of simplified iohexol plasma clearance techniques.

Implementing shortened one-compartment iohexol plasma clearance models for GFR measurement is crucial since the gold standard inulin renal clearance technique and the reference two-compartment, 10-hour, 16-samplings iohexol plasma clearance method are clinically unfeasible. Inulin may precipitate anaphylactic shock. Four-hour and 8-hour one-compartment iohexol plasma clearance models with Bröchner-Mortensen correction provide accurate GFR measurements in patients with estimated GFR (eGFR) > or ≤40 mL/min/1.73m2, respectively. We compared the performance of the simplified 5-hour, 4-samplings, two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model (popPK) with the performance of the reference two-compartment 10-hour iohexol method in 16 patients with GFR 15.2 to 56.5 mL/min/1.73 m2. We also compared the performance of shortened (5, 6 and 7-hour) one-compartment models with the performance of the standard 8-hour one-compartment model in 101 patients with eGFR ≤40 mL/min/1.73 m2. The performance of popPK and shortened methods versus reference methods was evaluated by total deviation index (TDI), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and coverage probability (CP). TDI <10%, CCC ≥0.9 and CP >90% indicated adequate performance. TDI, CCC and CP of popPK were 11.11%, 0.809 and 54.10%, respectively. All shortened, one-compartment models overestimated the GFR (p <0.0001 for all) as compared to the 8-hour model. TDI, CCC and CP were 7.02%, 0.815, and 75.80% for the 7-hour model, 7.26%, 0.803, and 74.20% for the 6-hour model, and 8.85%, 0.729 and 64.70% for the 5-hour model. The agreement of popPK model was comparable to that obtained with the Chronic-Kidney-Disease-Collaboration-Epidemiology (CKD-Epi) and the Modification-of-Diet-in-Renal-Disease (MDRD) serum-creatinine based equations for GFR estimation. PopPK model is remarkably unreliable for GFR measurement in stage III-IV CKD patients. In patients with eGFR ≤40 mL/min/1.73m2, shortened one-compartment models, in particular the 5-hour model, are less performant than the reference 8-hour model. For accurate GFR measurements, the iohexol plasma clearance should be measured with appropriate protocols. Over-simplified procedures should be avoided.

Anti-Phospholipase A2 Receptor 1 and Anti-Cysteine Rich Antibodies, Domain Recognition and Rituximab Efficacy in Membranous Nephropathy: A Prospective Cohort Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Proteinuria and anti-phospholipase A2 receptor 1 (anti-PLA2R1) antibody titers are associated with primary membranous nephropathy (MN) outcomes. We evaluated the association of antibodies against the cysteine-rich (CysR) and C-type lectin 1, 7, and 8 (CTLD1, CTLD7, and CTLD8) domains of PLA2R1 with MN outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: One-hundred-thirteen consecutive, consenting patients referred to the Nephology Unit of the Azienda-Socio-Sanitaria-Territoriale (ASST) Papa Giovanni XXIII (Bergamo, Italy) with PLA2R1-related, biopsy-proven MN whose persistent nephrotic syndrome (NS) was managed conservatively for>6 months and were monitored with serial evaluations of proteinuria, autoantibodies (by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), and clinical outcomes. EXPOSURE: Rituximab. OUTCOME: Complete (proteinuria<0.3g/24h) or partial (proteinuria≥0.3g/24h and<3.0g/24h with>50% reduction vs basal) NS remission. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: All patients had anti-CysR antibodies; 62 (54.9%) were multidomain recognizers. Anti-PLA2R1 and anti-CysR antibody titers were strongly correlated at baseline (P<0.001, r=0.934), 6 months (P<0.001, r=0.964), and 12 months (P<0.001, r=0.944). During a median follow-up of 37.1 (IQR, 20.3-56.9) months, 71 patients (62.8%) achieved either complete or partial remission of their NS. Lower baseline anti-PLA2R1 (HR, 0.997 [95% CI, 0.996-0.999], P=0.002) and anti-CysR [HR, 0.996 [95% CI, 0.993-0.998], P=0.001) titers were associated with a higher probability of remission, along with female sex, lower proteinuria, and lower serum creatinine levels (P<0.05 for all comparisons). Anti-CTLD antibodies were not associated with outcomes. At 6 and 12 months, compared to baseline, anti-PLA2R1 and anti-CysR antibody titers decreased more in patients progressing to partial or complete remission than in those without remission (P<0.05 for all comparisons). LIMITATIONS: Observational design. CONCLUSIONS: In PLA2R1-related MN, anti-PLA2R1 and anti-CysR antibodies similarly predict rituximab efficacy independent of PLA2R1 domain recognition. The choice between these tests should be dictated by feasibility and costs. Evaluating anti-CTLD antibodies appears unnecessary. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Primary membranous nephropathy (MN), a leading cause of nephrotic syndrome (NS) in adults, is an autoimmune disease caused by autoantibodies binding to the podocyte antigen phospholipase A2 receptor 1 (PLA2R1). We assessed whether the effects of anti-CD20 cytolytic therapy with the monoclonal antibody rituximab are associated with detection rates and levels of anti-PLA2R1 antibodies and antibodies against PLA2R1 domains such as cysteine-rich (CysR), and C-type lectin 1, 7, and 8 (CTLD1, 7, and 8), in patients with PLA2R1-related MN and persistent NS. The probability of rituximab-induced complete or partial NS remission was associated with baseline anti-PLA2R1 and anti-CysR antibody titers, but not with anti-CTLD1, 7 and 8 antibodies or multidomain recognition. Integrated evaluation of anti-PLA2R1 or anti-CysR antibodies with proteinuria and kidney function may play a role in monitoring the effects of rituximab in patients with PLA2R1-related NS and MN.