Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 52(4): 102566, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36870417

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 can lead to several types of complications during pregnancy. Variant surges are associated with different severities of disease. Few studies have compared the clinical consequences of specific variants on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. Our goal was to evaluate and compare disease severity in pregnant women and obstetrical or neonatal complications between variants of SARS-CoV-2 that have circulated in France over a two-year period (2020-2022). METHOD: This retrospective cohort study included all pregnant women with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (positive naso-pharyngeal RT-PCR test) from March 12, 2020 to January 31, 2022, in three tertiary maternal referral obstetric units in the Paris metropolitan area, France. We collected clinical and laboratory data for mothers and newborns from patients' medical records. Variant identification was either available following sequencing or extrapolated from epidemiological data. RESULTS: There were 234/501 (47%) Wild Type (WT), 127/501 (25%) Alpha, 98/501 (20%) Delta, and 42/501 (8%) Omicron. No significative difference was found regarding two composite adverse outcomes. There were significantly more hospitalizations for severe pneumopathy in Delta variant than WT, Alpha and Omicron respectively (63% vs 26%, 35% and 6%, p<0.001), more frequent oxygen administration (23% vs 12%, 10% and 5%, p = 0,001) and more symptomatic patients at the time of testing with Delta and WT (75% and 71%) versus Alpha and Omicron variants (55% and 66% respectively, p<0.01). Stillbirth tended to be associated with variants (p = 0.06): WT 1/231 (<1%) vs 4/126 (3%), 3/94 (3%), and 1/35 (3%) in Alpha, Delta and Omicron cases respectively. No other difference was found. CONCLUSION: Although the Delta variant was associated with more severe disease in pregnant women, we found no difference regarding neonatal and obstetrical outcomes. Neonatal and obstetrical specific severity may be due to mechanisms other than maternal ventilatory and general infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Mothers , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology
2.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 61(1): 59-66, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35900718

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the leading cause of non-genetic hearing and neurological deficits. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of valacyclovir (VCV) treatment in preventing CMV transmission to the fetus after maternal primary infection. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter study evaluating the rate of maternal-fetal CMV transmission in pregnancies with maternal primary CMV infection treated with VCV at a dosage of 8 g per day (VCV group) compared with a control group of untreated women. Each case underwent virological testing to confirm maternal primary infection and to provide accurate dating of onset of infection. The primary outcome was the presence of congenital CMV infection at birth diagnosed based on polymerase chain reaction analysis of saliva, urine and/or blood samples. The efficacy of VCV treatment was assessed using logistic regression analysis adjusted for a propensity score. RESULTS: In total, 143 patients were included in the final analysis, of whom 59 were in the VCV group and 84 were in the untreated control group. On propensity-score-adjusted analysis, VCV treatment was significantly associated with an overall reduction in the rate of maternal-fetal CMV transmission (odds ratio, 0.40 (95% CI, 0.18-0.90); P = 0.029). The rate of maternal-fetal CMV transmission, determined at birth, in the VCV vs control group was 7% (1/14) vs 10% (1/10) after periconceptional maternal primary infection (P = 1.00), 22% (8/36) vs 41% (19/46) after first-trimester maternal primary infection (P = 0.068) and 25% (2/8) vs 52% (14/27) after second-trimester maternal primary infection (P = 0.244). When analyzing the efficacy of VCV treatment according to maternal viremia at treatment initiation, there was a trend towards greater efficacy when patients were viremia-positive (21% vs 43%; P = 0.072) compared with when they were viremia-negative (22% vs 17%; P = 0.659). Maternal side effects associated with VCV were mild and non-specific in most cases. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that VCV treatment of pregnant women with primary CMV infection reduces the risk of maternal-fetal transmission of CMV and may be effective in cases with primary infection in the first and second trimesters. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.


Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Cytomegalovirus , Valacyclovir/therapeutic use , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Viremia/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Secondary Prevention , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Cytomegalovirus Infections/prevention & control , Cytomegalovirus Infections/diagnosis , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control
4.
Med Mal Infect ; 50(3): 243-251, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31727466

ABSTRACT

Since the first case of human infection by the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in Saudi Arabia in June 2012, more than 2260 cases of confirmed MERS-CoV infection and 803 related deaths have been reported since the 16th of October 2018. The vast majority of these cases (71%) were reported in Saudi Arabia but the epidemic has now spread to 27 countries and has not ceased 6 years later, unlike SARS-CoV that disappeared a little less than 2 years after emerging. Due to the high fatality rate observed in MERS-CoV infected patients (36%), much effort has been put into understanding the origin and pathophysiology of this novel coronavirus to prevent it from becoming endemic in humans. This review focuses in particular on the origin, epidemiology and clinical manifestations of MERS-CoV, as well as the diagnosis and treatment of infected patients. The experience gained over recent years on how to manage the different risks related to this kind of epidemic will be key to being prepared for future outbreaks of communicable disease.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/virology , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus/physiology , Animals , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Camelus/virology , Chiroptera/virology , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/epidemiology , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/prevention & control , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/virology , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Disease Management , Disease Reservoirs , Epidemics , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Genome, Viral , Global Health , Humans , Hygiene , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus/genetics , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus/isolation & purification , Risk Factors , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Survival Rate , Symptom Assessment , Travel , Viral Vaccines
6.
Pathol Biol (Paris) ; 46(6): 420-2, 1998 Jun.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9769874

ABSTRACT

Cidofovir (CDF) or Vistid is a monophosphate nucleoside analogue that inhibits the DNA polymerase of herpes viruses including the cytomegalovirus (CMV). CDF is active on GCV-resistant strains with a mutation on the phosphotransferase gene (UL97). However, DNA polymerase gene mutations that induce resistance to GCV are responsible for cross-resistance to CDF. Resistance phenotypes to GCV and CDF were determined for 57 CMV strains isolated from blood and urine samples. Sixteen strains were recovered after CDF therapy. Of the remaining 41 CDF-naive strains, 34 were susceptible and seven resistant to GCV. Fifty percent inhibitory concentrations (IC50) for CDF were in the 0.2-2.6 microM range for CDF-naive strains susceptible to GCV. For GCV-resistant strains, IC50 values for CDF were < or = 3 microM for strains with a low level of resistance to GCV (GCV IC50 < 30 microM) and > or = 6 microM for three of the five strains with a high level of resistance to GCV (GCV IC50 > or = 30 microM).


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Cytomegalovirus/drug effects , Cytosine/analogs & derivatives , Ganciclovir/pharmacology , Organophosphonates , Organophosphorus Compounds/pharmacology , Cidofovir , Cytomegalovirus/enzymology , Cytomegalovirus/genetics , Cytosine/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Drug Resistance, Multiple , Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors , Phosphotransferases (Alcohol Group Acceptor)/genetics , Viral Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Viral Proteins/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...