ABSTRACT
Fluoroquinolones are a class of widely prescribed antibiotics with a broad range of activity against Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and some atypical microbes. Unfortunately, these drugs are associated with significant adverse events including neuropathy, tendinopathy, cardiac rhythm abnormalities, and mental health side effects. The mechanism by which fluoroquinolones cause many of these toxicities is unknown. The antibacterial mechanism of action involves disruption of the catalytic mechanism of type-II topoisomerases in bacteria, namely topoisomerase IV and DNA gyrase. Fluoroquinolones inhibit the ability of the enzymes to ligate cleaved DNA and result in single- and double-stranded DNA breaks. Thus, there is an interest in investigating whether human topoisomerase II is involved in mediating the adverse events associated with quinolones. Previous studies demonstrate some response of human topoisomerase IIα and IIß to high levels of ciprofloxacin. However, it is not clear whether the concentration of ciprofloxacin utilized in those studies corresponds to concentrations that would be routinely achievable in patients. Therefore, this study set out to examine three clinically relevant fluoroquinolones along with two older agents to determine whether these compounds display activity against topoisomerase IIα and IIß at drug concentrations that more closely approximate typical patient plasma values. On the basis of our evidence, none of the quinolones studied were able to poison DNA cleavage by either human enzyme. Ciprofloxacin, desethylene-ciprofloxacin, and the recently removed from market gemifloxacin were able to inhibit topoisomerase II-mediated DNA relaxation at concentrations of 200-300 µM. On the basis of these data, we propose that human topoisomerase II is not likely to be the main cause of these adverse events and that additional targets need to be identified to clarify the mechanisms underlying quinolone toxicities.
ABSTRACT
Topoisomerase II is a critical enzyme in replication, transcription, and the regulation of chromatin topology. Several anticancer agents target topoisomerases in order to disrupt cell growth. Cannabidiol is a major non-euphoriant, pharmacologically active component of cannabis. Previously, we examined the cannabidiol derivative HU-331 in order to characterize the mechanism of the compound against topoisomerase IIα. In this current work, we explore whether cannabidiol (CBD) impacts topoisomerase II activity, and we additionally examine the activity of these compounds against topoisomerase IIß. CBD does not appear to strongly inhibit DNA relaxation and is not a poison of topoisomerase II DNA cleavage. However, oxidation of CBD allows this compound to inhibit DNA relaxation by topoisomerase IIα and ß without poisoning DNA cleavage. Additionally, we found that oxidized CBD, similar to HU-331, inhibits ATP hydrolysis and can result in inactivation of topoisomerase IIα and ß. We also determined that oxidized CBD and HU-331 are both able to stabilize the N-terminal clamp of topoisomerase II. Taken together, we conclude that while CBD does not have significant activity against topoisomerase II, both oxidized CBD and HU-331 are active against both isoforms of topoisomerase II. We hypothesize that oxidized CBD and HU-331 act against the enzyme through interaction with the N-terminal ATPase domain. According to the model we propose, topoisomerase II inactivation may result from a decrease in the ability of the enzyme to bind to DNA when the compound is bound to the N-terminus.
