Soil and Crop Management Practices to Minimize the Impact of Waterlogging on Crop Productivity.

Waterlogging remains a significant constraint to cereal production across the globe in areas with high rainfall and/or poor drainage. Improving tolerance of plants to waterlogging is the most economical way of tackling the problem. However, under severe waterlogging combined agronomic, engineering and genetic solutions will be more effective. A wide range of agronomic and engineering solutions are currently being used by grain growers to reduce losses from waterlogging. In this scoping study, we reviewed the effects of waterlogging on plant growth, and advantages and disadvantages of various agronomic and engineering solutions which are used to mitigate waterlogging damage. Further research should be focused on: cost/benefit analyses of different drainage strategies; understanding the mechanisms of nutrient loss during waterlogging and quantifying the benefits of nutrient application; increasing soil profile de-watering through soil improvement and agronomic strategies; revealing specificity of the interaction between different management practices and environment as well as among management practices; and more importantly, combined genetic, agronomic and engineering strategies for varying environments.

At-a-glance - What can paramedic data tell us about the opioid crisis in Canada? / Aperçu - Que peuvent nous révéler les données des ambulanciers paramédicaux sur la crise des opioïdes au Canada?

The nature of Canada's opioid crisis necessitates additional data sources that can provide a more comprehensive picture of the epidemic, in order to provide public health officials and decision-makers with a robust evidence base. Paramedic data provide a conduit into the community where overdoses occur. Prehospital events and circumstances surrounding opioid-related overdoses provide unique opportunities to collect evidence that can contribute to prevention, harm reduction and health promotion efforts. Using data extracted from the Ottawa Paramedic Service (OPS), this proof-of-concept study demonstrated that paramedic response data were useful in providing near real-time epidemiological information (person, time and place) on the opioid epidemic and in assessing trends and opportunities to develop alert triggers. Between January and June 2017, the OPS responded to an average of four opioid-related calls each week. On average, 0.5 mg of naloxone was administered each time. For the study period, linear trends show a small but insignificant increase in calls (p = 0.18). A higher volume of calls occurred between April 16 and 29, 2017. According to local media reports, this spike in paramedic responses was due to the arrival of high-grade fentanyl in Ottawa. With further validation, paramedic data can potentially provide a novel data source to monitor opioid-related overdoses.

RÉSUMÉ: La nature de la crise des opioïdes au Canada nécessite des sources de données supplémentaires aptes à dresser un portrait plus fidèle de l'épidémie, afin de fournir aux responsables en santé publique et aux décideurs une base de données probantes solide. Les données des ambulanciers paramédicaux sont un point d'accès aux collectivités où les surdoses surviennent. Les événements préhospitaliers et les circonstances entourant les surdoses d'opioïdes offrent des occasions uniques de recueillir des données probantes pouvant contribuer à la prévention, à la réduction des méfaits et aux efforts de promotion de la santé. À l'aide de données extraites du Service paramédic d'Ottawa (SPO), cette étude de validation de principe a démontré que les données d'intervention ambulancière paramédicale étaient utiles pour obtenir des renseignements épidémiologiques en temps quasi réel (personne, heure et lieu) sur l'épidémie d'opioïdes et pour évaluer les tendances ainsi que les possibilités d'élaborer des déclencheurs d'alerte. Entre janvier et juin 2017, le SPO a répondu à une moyenne de quatre appels liés aux opioïdes par semaine. À chaque fois, 0,5 mg de naloxone ont en moyenne été administrés. Pour la période à l'étude, les tendances linéaires montrent une faible augmentation des appels, non significative (p = 0,18). Le volume d'appels a augmenté entre le 16 et le 29 avril 2017. Selon les médias locaux, ce pic dans les interventions ambulancières paramédicales est attribuable à l'arrivée de fentanyl de qualité supérieure à Ottawa. Avec une validation plus poussée, ces données paramédicales pourraient potentiellement constituer une nouvelle source de données pour la surveillance des surdoses liées aux opioïdes.

Intermittent intravenous pantoprazole and continuous cimetidine infusion: effect on gastric pH control in critically ill patients at risk of developing stress-related mucosal disease.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess intermittent intravenous (IV) pantoprazole for control of gastric acid and the possible prevention of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding in intensive care units (ICU) patients. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, dose-ranging pilot study of IV pantoprazole (40 mg q24 hour; 40 mg q12 hour; 80 mg q24 hour; 80 mg q12 hour; 80 mg q8 hour) or continuously infused cimetidine (300 mg bolus; 50 mg/h) in patients at risk for UGI bleeding. The primary endpoint was percent time gastric pH >/=4.0. UGI bleeding and pneumonia were measured as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Two hundred two ICU patients were randomized. Gastric pH was well controlled by all treatments. Gastric pH control improved from day 1 to day 2 in all pantoprazole groups, whereas there was decreased pH control in the cimetidine group. There were no cases of protocol defined UGI bleeding in any treatment group. Adverse event frequency and pneumonia incidence were similar between pantoprazole and cimetidine treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study indicates that intermittent IV pantoprazole effectively controls gastric pH and may protect against UGI bleeding in high risk ICU patients without the development of tolerance.

The OPALS Major Trauma Study: impact of advanced life-support on survival and morbidity.

BACKGROUND: To date, the benefit of prehospital advanced life-support programs on trauma-related mortality and morbidity has not been established METHODS: The Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support (OPALS) Major Trauma Study was a before-after systemwide controlled clinical trial conducted in 17 cities. We enrolled adult patients who had experienced major trauma in a basic life-support phase and a subsequent advanced life-support phase (during which paramedics were able to perform endotracheal intubation and administer fluids and drugs intravenously). The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: Among the 2867 patients enrolled in the basic life-support (n = 1373) and advanced life-support (n = 1494) phases, characteristics were similar, including mean age (44.8 v. 47.5 years), frequency of blunt injury (92.0% v. 91.4%), median injury severity score (24 v. 22) and percentage of patients with Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 9 (27.2% v. 22.1%). Survival did not differ overall (81.1% among patients in the advanced life-support phase v. 81.8% among those in the basic life-support phase; p = 0.65). Among patients with Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 9, survival was lower among those in the advanced life-support phase (50.9% v. 60.0%; p = 0.02). The adjusted odds of death for the advanced life-support v. basic life-support phases were nonsignificant (1.2, 95% confidence interval 0.9-1.7; p = 0.16). INTERPRETATION: The OPALS Major Trauma Study showed that systemwide implementation of full advanced life-support programs did not decrease mortality or morbidity for major trauma patients. We also found that during the advanced life-support phase, mortality was greater among patients with Glasgow Coma Scale scores less than 9. We believe that emergency medical services should carefully re-evaluate the indications for and application of prehospital advanced life-support measures for patients who have experienced major trauma.

Advanced life support for out-of-hospital respiratory distress.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory distress is a common symptom of patients transported to hospitals by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel. The benefit of advanced life support for such patients has not been established. METHODS: The Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support (OPALS) Study was a controlled clinical trial that was conducted in 15 cities before and after the implementation of a program to provide advanced life support for patients with out-of-hospital respiratory distress. Paramedics were trained in standard advanced life support, including endotracheal intubation and the administration of intravenous drugs. RESULTS: The clinical characteristics of the 8138 patients in the two phases of the study were similar. During the first phase, no patients were treated by paramedics trained in advanced life support; during the second phase, 56.6% of patients received this treatment. Endotracheal intubation was performed in 1.4% of the patients, and intravenous drugs were administered to 15.0% during the second phase. This phase of the study was also marked by a substantial increase in the use of nebulized salbutamol and sublingual nitroglycerin for the relief of symptoms. The rate of death among all patients decreased significantly, from 14.3% to 12.4% (absolute difference, 1.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4 to 3.4; P=0.01) from the basic-life-support phase to the advanced-life-support phase (adjusted odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.5). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a specific regimen of out-of-hospital advanced-life-support interventions to an existing EMS system that provides basic life support was associated with a decrease in the rate of death of 1.9 percentage points among patients with respiratory distress.

Intravenous pantoprazole as initial treatment in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and a history of erosive esophagitis: a randomized clinical trial.

We sought to evaluate safety and efficacy of IV pantoprazole when used as initial therapy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and a history of erosive esophagitis (EE) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group study. Patients were randomized to 7 days of once-daily IV or oral pantoprazole (40 mg) or placebo. Efficacy variables included maximal acid output, basal acid output, and changes from baseline in frequency/severity of GERD symptoms, and frequency of antacid usage. Seventy-eight patients were randomized (n=26/27/25 [IV/oral/placebo]). Mean maximal acid output was 8.4, 6.3, and 20.9 mEq/h for IV or oral pantoprazole, and placebo, respectively. For pantoprazole versus placebo, maximal and basal acid output were significantly lower (P<.001) and there was a numerical trend toward improved GERD and antacid usage. Both treatments were well tolerated. In conclusion, IV/oral pantoprazole were similarly effective in suppressing basal and pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion in GERD patients with a history of EE.

Advanced cardiac life support in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: The Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support (OPALS) Study tested the incremental effect on the rate of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of adding a program of advanced life support to a program of rapid defibrillation. METHODS: This multicenter, controlled clinical trial was conducted in 17 cities before and after advanced-life-support programs were instituted and enrolled 5638 patients who had had cardiac arrest outside the hospital. Of those patients, 1391 were enrolled during the rapid-defibrillation phase and 4247 during the subsequent advanced-life-support phase. Paramedics were trained in standard advanced life support, which includes endotracheal intubation and the administration of intravenous drugs. RESULTS: From the rapid-defibrillation phase to the advanced-life-support phase, the rate of admission to a hospital increased significantly (10.9 percent vs. 14.6 percent, P<0.001), but the rate of survival to hospital discharge did not (5.0 percent vs. 5.1 percent, P=0.83). The multivariate odds ratio for survival after advanced life support was 1.1 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.8 to 1.5); after an arrest witnessed by a bystander, 4.4 (95 percent confidence interval, 3.1 to 6.4); after cardiopulmonary resuscitation administered by a bystander, 3.7 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.5 to 5.4); and after rapid defibrillation, 3.4 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.4 to 8.4). There was no improvement in the rate of survival with the use of advanced life support in any subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of advanced-life-support interventions did not improve the rate of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a previously optimized emergency-medical-services system of rapid defibrillation. In order to save lives, health care planners should make cardiopulmonary resuscitation by citizens and rapid-defibrillation responses a priority for the resources of emergency-medical-services systems.