Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Trop Med Infect Dis ; 4(3)2019 Jul 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31277453

ABSTRACT

Uncertainty regarding transmission pathways and control measures makes prompt presentation and diagnosis for Buruli ulcer critical. To examine presentation and diagnosis delays in Victoria, Australia, we conducted a retrospective study of 703 cases notified between 2011 and 2017, classified as residing in an endemic (Mornington Peninsula; Bellarine Peninsula; South-east Bayside and Frankston) or non-endemic area. Overall median presentation delay was 30 days (IQR 14-60 days), with no significant change over the study period (p = 0.11). There were significant differences in median presentation delay between areas of residence (p = 0.02), but no significant change over the study period within any area. Overall median diagnosis delay was 10 days (IQR 0-40 days), with no significant change over the study period (p = 0.13). There were significant differences in median diagnosis delay between areas (p < 0.001), but a significant decrease over time only on the Mornington Peninsula (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, being aged <15 or >65 years; having non-ulcerative disease; and residing in the Bellarine Peninsula or South-East Bayside (compared to non-endemic areas) were significantly associated with shorter presentation delay. Residing in the Bellarine or Mornington Peninsula and being notified later in the study period were significantly associated with shorter diagnosis delay. To reduce presentation and diagnosis delays, awareness of Buruli ulcer must be raised with the public and medical professionals, particularly those based outside established endemic areas.

2.
J Gen Virol ; 94(Pt 7): 1462-1467, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23426358

ABSTRACT

The Kokobera virus group comprises mosquito-borne flaviviruses that cluster together phylogenetically. These viruses are unique to Australia and Papua New Guinea, and have been associated with a mild polyarticular disease in humans. Recent isolation of genetically diverse viruses within this group has prompted analysis of their genetic and phenotypic relationships. Phylogenetic analysis based on complete ORF, the envelope gene or the NS5/3' untranslated region supported the separation of the group into distinct species: Kokobera virus (KOKV), Stratford virus, New Mapoon virus, MK7979 and TS5273. Virulence studies in 3-week-old mice also provided the first evidence that a member of the KOKV group (MK7979) was neuroinvasive after intraperitoneal inoculation. In this context, our recent detection of KOKV group-specific antibodies in horses in the field suggests that these viruses should be considered in the epidemiology of flavivirus encephalitis in Australia.


Subject(s)
Encephalitis, Viral , Flavivirus/classification , Flavivirus/genetics , Genetic Drift , Genetic Variation , Animals , Australia , Culicidae/genetics , Culicidae/virology , Encephalitis, Viral/pathology , Encephalitis, Viral/virology , Flavivirus/isolation & purification , Flavivirus/pathogenicity , Flavivirus Infections/pathology , Flavivirus Infections/virology , Humans , Mice , Molecular Sequence Data , Papua New Guinea , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Species Specificity , Virulence
3.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 30(1 Suppl): S25-9, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21183837

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: : Rotavirus vaccines were introduced into the funded Australian National Immunization Program (NIP) in July 2007. Due to purchasing arrangements, individual states and territories chose either a 2-dose RV1 (Rotarix, GSK) regimen or 3-dose RV5 (Rotateq, Merck/CSL) regimen. This allowed comparison of both vaccines in similar populations with high infant vaccination coverage. METHODS: : Admission and rotavirus identification data from the major pediatric hospitals in 3 states (2 using RV5, 1 RV1), together with state-based hospitalization and vaccination data from Queensland (RV5) were analyzed for the years before, and up to 30 months following rotavirus vaccine introduction. Emergency encounters and short-stay unit admissions for gastroenteritis are also described. RESULTS: : Rotavirus vaccine coverage in Australia is high, with 87% of infants receiving at least 1 dose. Hospital admissions for both rotavirus gastroenteritis and nonrotavirus-coded gastroenteritis were reduced following vaccine introduction in all states, not only for the age group eligible for NIP rotavirus vaccination, but also for children born prior. RV5 vaccine efficacy in Queensland has been estimated at 89.3%. Marked reductions in acute gastroenteritis emergency presentations and short-stay unit admissions have also been observed. CONCLUSIONS: : Early evidence from the NIP in Australia has demonstrated high rotavirus coverage with both RV1 and RV5. The introduction of both vaccines has been associated with a marked reduction in gastroenteritis admissions, supportive of both direct vaccine protection, as well as with indirect herd protection.


Subject(s)
Gastroenteritis/epidemiology , Gastroenteritis/prevention & control , Hospitalization/trends , Rotavirus Infections/epidemiology , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Child , Child, Preschool , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Medical Services/trends , Health Policy , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Immunity, Herd , Immunization Programs , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Queensland/epidemiology , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage
4.
Pediatrics ; 126(3): e506-12, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20732946

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A publicly funded, universal infant pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (RV5) program was implemented in Queensland, Australia, in mid-2007. We sought to assess vaccine effectiveness (VE) of 3 doses of RV5 at preventing rotavirus and nonrotavirus acute gastroenteritis (AGE) hospitalizations in the first birth cohort and impact on hospitalizations in all age groups. METHODS: Hospitalization rates for rotavirus and nonrotavirus AGE in all age groups before and after RV5 introduction were compared. Population vaccine coverage, hospitalization data, and individual vaccination status were obtained from routinely collected, publicly funded state- and nationally based data sets. Data linkage was performed to calculate 3-dose VE for preventing hospitalization in the eligible age group. RESULTS: RV5 coverage in the first eligible birth cohort was 89.6% for at least 1 dose and 73.1% for 3 doses. Three-dose VE for preventing nonrotavirus AGE hospitalization was 62.3% to 63.9% (any/primary diagnosis) and 89.3% to 93.9% (any/primary diagnosis) for rotavirus hospitalizations. After program implementation, there were immediate and sustained reductions in rotavirus hospitalizations for those who were younger than 20 years and nonrotavirus AGE-coded hospitalizations for those who were younger than 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: RV5 is highly effective at preventing rotavirus hospitalizations in a developed country setting, confirming efficacy figures from the pivotal clinical trial. Additional direct and indirect effects are substantial and include reductions in nonrotavirus AGE hospitalizations in vaccinated age groups and rotavirus and nonrotavirus AGE hospitalization rates in older age groups.


Subject(s)
Gastroenteritis/prevention & control , Gastroenteritis/virology , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Australia , Gastroenteritis/epidemiology , Gastroenteritis/therapy , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...