ABSTRACT
Diagnostic tests for Johne's disease in cattle are characterised by poor sensitivity and often imperfect specificity at the animal level. Because farmers and veterinarians have limited assurance or confidence from results of testing individual animals for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP), control programmes based on whole herd-level testing provide the best framework for classifying herds. At the herd level, there is a diverse range of testing options for MAP based on both direct and indirect testing of individual and pooled samples. The most common measures of herd test performance, herd sensitivity (HSe) and herd specificity (HSp), are important for decision-making in herd test selection, for estimating prevalence and as inputs for simulation studies. This systematic review investigated the results of herd test evaluations for MAP in cattle, through a comprehensive search of the literature and a systematic four-stage screening process to identify relevant publications. Forty-six publications with relevant results were eligible for inclusion in the final review, containing evaluations of whole-herd ELISA serological testing, bulk milk tank ELISA, culture, PCR and phage testing, pooled faecal testing and environmental sample testing. Data extracted from each publication included sample populations, methods of analysis, reference tests, cut-off points, HSe and HSp. Direct comparisons between the reported HSe and HSp estimates of different studies is challenging due to the variations in herd prevalence and test protocols used. The data in this systematic review will benefit decision-makers and researchers and highlights knowledge gaps requiring further research.
