Radiosensitization produced in vivo by once- vs. twice-weekly 2'2'-difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine (gemcitabine).

PURPOSE: Gemcitabine (2'2'-difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine, dFdCyd) is a potent radiosensitizer of rodent and human tumor cells. Our Phase I clinical trial using once-weekly dFdCyd as a radiosensitizer in the treatment of patients with Stage IV squamous cell head and neck cancer has produced a high rate of tumor response and significant normal mucosal toxicity. These findings raised the question of whether we are using dFdCyd in the optimal dose and schedule. In vitro studies suggest that twice-weekly dFdCyd has the potential to be more effective than once-weekly dFdCyd when administered in combination with radiation (RT) given 5 days per week. Therefore, we have used a mouse model to assess whether the therapeutic ratio of combined modality therapy may be improved by using a twice-weekly drug regimen. We asked two questions: 1) Does a once-weekly or twice-weekly dFdCyd regimen cause more normal tissue radiosensitization? 2) Does a once-weekly or twice-weekly dFdCyd + RT regimen produce a better therapeutic index? METHODS AND MATERIALS: To assess normal tissue toxicity, C3H mice underwent mouth (60)Co RT (27.5 Gy in 5 daily fractions) +/- dFdCyd delivered intraperitoneally (IP) either once or twice weekly 6 hours prior to irradiation. Acute lip reactions were quantified according to a standard scoring system, and weight loss was measured. We measured tumor control using squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) VII murine squamous cell flank tumors (50-125 mm(3)) treated with the same regimens used in the mouth irradiation model. RESULTS: We found that dFdCyd delivered 800 mg/kg once weekly or 150 mg/kg twice weekly caused similar (and maximal tolerable) weight loss; therefore these regimens were chosen to test which schedule produced more acute lip radiosensitization. Twice-weekly dFdCyd + RT was somewhat more toxic by weight loss (800 mg/kg once weekly: 11.9%; 150 mg/kg twice weekly: 17.7%; p = 0.09). To assess therapeutic index, we treated SCC VII flank tumors with RT combined with isotoxic drug/RT regimens (dFdCyd 800 mg/kg once weekly or 100 mg/kg twice weekly). Tumors treated with twice-weekly dFdCyd + RT were significantly smaller than tumors treated with once-weekly drug + RT at 28 days from the start of treatment (p < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that equitoxic once- versus twice-weekly dFdCyd regimens cause differing levels of oral mucosal radiosensitization. This would suggest that each radiation-dFdCyd schedule will require its own dFdCyd dose escalation trial (which cannot be determined by the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for dFdCyd alone using that schedule). In addition, our findings suggest that for head and neck cancers twice-weekly dFdCyd may have a higher therapeutic index compared with once-weekly dFdCyd when combined with daily RT.

Permanent implantation of 125I sources in the prostate: radical limits of simplicity.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of reducing the number of sources per implantation on the dose coverage of the prostate volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Idealized source distributions were planned for four, eight, 16, 24, 32, and 48 sources. The peripheral loading technique was used to plan a uniform, conformal dose distribution to the target volume, which was the prostate volume as visualized at ultrasonography. Source-placement error was estimated by using measured error magnitudes and was expressed with systematic and random components. The relative sensitivities of the plans to the source-placement error were studied. RESULTS: Idealized planned target coverage can be adequately achieved with comparable dose distributions with eight or more sources. The sensitivity to source-placement error is comparable for plans with 16 or more sources. CONCLUSION: It is theoretically possible to radically simplify implantation without compromising target coverage or error tolerance.

Radiosensitization by gemcitabine.

Gemcitabine is a potent radiosensitizer in both laboratory studies and in the clinic. Initial laboratory studies showed that gemcitabine radiosensitizes a wide variety of rodent and human tumor cells in culture. Maximum radiosensitization occurs in cells that demonstrate concurrent redistribution into S phase and d-adenosine triphosphate pool depletion. Although the mechanism of sensitization is not yet clear, recent evidence from our laboratory suggests that gemcitabine lowers the threshold for radiation-induced apoptosis. Our preclinical data were used to design gemcitabine dose-escalation trials in combination with standard radiation for patients with unresectable head and neck cancer and pancreatic cancer. In head and neck cancer, we have found that gemcitabine doses far below the maximum tolerated dose for the drug when used alone significantly potentiate the toxicity of treatment. Comparatively, normal tissue sensitization has not been as marked in the treatment of pancreatic tumors. These findings have led us to conduct experiments using an animal model to improve the therapeutic index of treatment. We conclude that gemcitabine is a promising radiation sensitizer that will need to be developed cautiously if excessive normal tissue toxicity is to be avoided.

beta-Lactamase-mediated inactivation and efficacy of cefazolin and cefmetazole in Staphylococcus aureus abscesses.

12694668 Clinical reports and animal models have demonstrated that cefazolin may have decreased efficacy against some strains of Staphylococcus aureus because of type A beta-lactamase-mediated hydrolysis. We sought to measure biologically active cefazolin concentrations within abscesses with high concentrations of S. aureus and compare the concentrations with those of cefmetazole, a beta-lactamase-stable cephamycin. A type A beta-lactamase-producing strain of S. aureus with a demonstrated inoculum effect against cefazolin (MIC at an inoculum of 5 x 10(5) CFU/ml, 1.0 micrograms/ml; MIC at an inoculum of 5 x 10(7) CFU/ml, 32.0 micrograms/ml) but not cefmetazole (MICs at inocula of 5 x 10(5) and 5 x 10(7) CFU/ml, 2.0 micrograms/ml) was used. Cefazolin or cefmetazole (100 mg/kg of body weight every 8 h for 8 days) was administered to rabbits with infected tissue cages. No differences in the concentrations of the two drugs in the uninfected tissue cages were observed. Higher concentrations of cefmetazole than cefazolin were found in infected tissue cages at day 3 (5.9 +/- 0.7 versus 2.2 +/- 0.3 micrograms/ml; P < 0.01), day 5 (9.1 +/- 2.6 versus 3.6 +/- 0.7 micrograms/ml; P = 0.02), and day 8 (9.4 +/- 1.4 versus 4.8 +/- 0.9 micrograms/ml; P = 0.01) after infection. Cefazolin and cefmetazole were equally effective in reducing the bacterial concentration in the abscess. In vitro experiments demonstrated greater cefazolin than cefmetazole degradation by S. aureus, but the differences were greater in serum than in abscess fluid supernatants. We conclude that abscess cefazolin concentrations are diminished by type A beta-lactamase-producing S. aureus, but this did not affect drug efficacy in this model.

Efficacies of various antimicrobial agents in treatment of Staphylococcus aureus abscesses and correlation with in vitro tests of antimicrobial activity and neutrophil killing.

A rabbit perforated-capsule model was utilized to study antimicrobial efficacy in treating 2-week-old Staphylococcus aureus abscesses. Animals received either ciprofloxacin (30 mg/kg), cefazolin (100 mg/kg), or ciprofloxacin (30 mg/kg) plus rifampin (20 mg/kg) every 8 h for 8 days or no antibiotic. Antibiotic levels within the abscess exceeded the MIC for the test organism. At the end of treatment, ciprofloxacin was no more effective than the control, animals receiving cefazolin had a mean log10 fall of 2.41 CFU/ml, and animals receiving ciprofloxacin plus rifampin had a mean log10 reduction of 5.06 CFU/ml (P = less than 0.01). Six days after completion of therapy, all abscesses in animals receiving ciprofloxacin plus rifampin were culture negative. Surviving organisms in animals receiving ciprofloxacin or rifampin did not develop resistance to the treatment antibiotics. In vitro time-kill curves performed with logarithmic- and stationary-phase organisms in broth, serum, and abscess fluid supernatants did not correlate with the in vivo results. Neutrophil killing studies of S. aureus pretreated with antibiotics revealed greater killing of organisms pretreated with ciprofloxacin plus rifampin than of those pretreated with cefazolin or ciprofloxacin alone. In conclusion, ciprofloxacin plus rifampin was effective therapy in this staphylococcal abscess model, compared with the moderate efficacy of cefazolin and no effect observed with ciprofloxacin alone. Enhanced neutrophil killing of S. aureus pretreated with antibiotics may be an important mechanism by which bacteria are killed in suppurative infections.

Disposition and excretion of chlorendic acid in Fischer 344 rats.

The absorption, distribution, and excretion of a highly chlorinated dicarboxylic acid, chlorendic acid, was studied in the male Fischer 344 rat. [14C]Chlorendic acid was absorbed after an oral dose of 7.7 mumol per kilogram of body weight. The distribution in various tissues was similar whether the treatment was by the oral or the intravenous route. The major site of [14C]chlorendic acid deposition was the liver, with smaller amounts found in the blood, muscle, skin, and kidneys. Chlorendic acid-derived radioactivity was excreted primarily through the bile and into the feces. The urine contained less than 6% of the total dose. Within 1 d, more than 75% of the total dose was excreted in the feces, primarily as metabolites. Radioactivity in the liver was also primarily metabolites of chlorendic acid. Thus, chlorendic acid was absorbed, metabolized, and excreted primarily in the feces as metabolites. The rapid metabolism and biliary excretion of chlorendic acid contrast with observations for the closely related lipophilic compounds aldrin and dieldrin.