Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37444154

ABSTRACT

Little is known about occupational SARS-CoV-2 exposures and COVID-19 outcomes. We established a Doctor's First Reports of Occupational Injury or Illness (DFR)-based surveillance system to study cases of work-related COVID-19 exposures and disease. The surveillance data included demographics, occupation, industry, exposure, and illness, details including hospitalization and lost work. We classified workers into 'healthcare', non-healthcare 'public-facing', or 'other' worker groups, and rural-urban commuting areas (RUCAs). We describe worker exposures and outcomes overall by worker group and RUCA. We analyzed 2848 COVID-19 DFRs representing workers in 22 detailed occupation groups and 19 industry groups. Most DFRs were for workers in metropolitan RUCAs (89%) and those in healthcare (42%) and public-facing (24%) worker groups. While DFRs were from 382 unique worksites, 52% were from four hospitals and one prison. Among 1063 DFRs with a suspected exposure, 73% suspected exposure to a patient or client. Few DFRs indicated hospitalization (3.9%); however, the proportion hospitalized was higher among nonmetropolitan (7.4%) and public-facing (6.7%) workers. While 56% of DFRs indicated some lost work time, the proportion was highest among public-facing (80%) workers. Healthcare and prison workers were the majority of reported occupational COVID-19 exposures and illnesses. The risk of COVID-19 hospitalization and lost work may be highest among nonmetropolitan and public-facing workers.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Workplace , Occupations , California/epidemiology , Health Personnel
2.
Obesity (Silver Spring) ; 25(2): 346-351, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28026901

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effect of 12 months of aerobic and resistance exercise versus usual care on changes in body composition in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors taking aromatase inhibitors (AIs). METHODS: The Hormones and Physical Exercise study enrolled 121 breast cancer survivors and randomized them to either supervised twice-weekly resistance exercise training and 150 min/wk of aerobic exercise (N = 61) or a usual care (N = 60) group. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans were conducted at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months to assess changes in body mass index, percent body fat, lean body mass, and bone mineral density. RESULTS: At 12 months, the exercise group relative to the usual care group had a significant increase in lean body mass (0.32 vs. -0.88 kg, P = 0.03), a decrease in percent body fat (-1.4% vs. 0.48%, P = 0.03), and a decrease in body mass index (-0.73 vs. 0.17 kg/m2 , P = 0.03). Change in bone mineral density was not significantly different between groups at 12 months (0.001 vs. -0.006 g/cm2 , P = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: A combined resistance and aerobic exercise intervention improved body composition in breast cancer survivors taking AIs. Exercise interventions may help to mitigate the negative side effects of AIs and improve health outcomes in breast cancer survivors.


Subject(s)
Aromatase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Body Composition/physiology , Bone Density/physiology , Breast Neoplasms/physiopathology , Exercise/physiology , Survivors , Absorptiometry, Photon , Aged , Aromatase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Body Composition/drug effects , Bone Density/drug effects , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Resistance Training
3.
J Cancer Surviv ; 10(4): 654-62, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26782031

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Up to 50 % of postmenopausal breast cancer survivors taking aromatase inhibitors (AIs) experience AI-associated arthralgias, or joint pain, which causes many to stop taking AIs and may inhibit exercise, despite known health benefits. We thus evaluated exercise adherence and factors associated with better exercise adherence in breast cancer survivors experiencing AI-induced arthralgia in the (HOPE) year long randomized controlled trial. METHODS: We included 61 HOPE women randomized to exercise (150 min/week of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise and twice-weekly supervised strength training). Our main outcomes were aerobic exercise measured with daily activity logs, attendance at supervised exercise sessions, and changes in cardiorespiratory fitness, measured maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max). We examined means and standard deviations (SDs) for exercise adherence by demographic and medical characteristics and used the t test for mean differences. We also examined predictors of adherence using linear regression. RESULTS: On average, at the end of the year long trial, women reported 119 (SD 78) min/week of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise and participated in 70 % of supervised exercise training sessions. After adjustment for other factors that influence adherence, at 6 months postrandomization, only baseline VO2max was associated with higher aerobic exercise levels and at 12 months, only older age predicted better supervised exercise training attendance. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer survivors taking AIs and experiencing arthralgia are able to initiate and maintain a year long exercise program, regardless of other factors that influence activity levels. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Breast cancer survivors can exercise at levels that have been shown to improve AI-associated arthralgia.


Subject(s)
Aromatase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Exercise/physiology , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Survivors , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Clin Oncol ; 33(10): 1104-11, 2015 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25452437

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Arthralgia occurs in up to 50% of breast cancer survivors treated with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and is the most common reason for poor AI adherence. We conducted, in 121 breast cancer survivors receiving an AI and reporting arthralgia, a yearlong randomized trial of the impact of exercise versus usual care on arthralgia severity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria included receiving an AI for at least 6 months, reporting ≥ 3 of 10 for worst joint pain on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and reporting < 90 minutes per week of aerobic exercise and no strength training. Participants were randomly assigned to exercise (150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise and supervised strength training twice per week) or usual care. The BPI, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire were completed at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Intervention effects were evaluated using mixed-model repeated measures analysis, with change at 12 months as the primary end point. RESULTS: Over 12 months, women randomly assigned to exercise (n = 61) attended 70% (± standard deviation [SD], 28%) of resistance training sessions and increased their exercise by 159 (± SD, 136) minutes per week. Worst joint pain scores decreased by 1.6 points (29%) at 12 months among women randomly assigned to exercise versus a 0.2-point increase (3%) among those receiving usual care (n = 60; P < .001). Pain severity and interference, as well as DASH and WOMAC pain scores, also decreased significantly at 12 months in women randomly assigned to exercise, compared with increases for those receiving usual care (all P < .001). CONCLUSION: Exercise led to improvement in AI-induced arthralgia in previously inactive breast cancer survivors.


Subject(s)
Aromatase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Arthralgia/therapy , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Exercise Therapy/methods , Survivors , Aged , Aromatase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Arthralgia/chemically induced , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Occup Environ Med ; 52(2): 137-43, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20134342

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Several adverse pregnancy outcomes were reported among female laboratory workers in a North American aluminum smelter. To determine whether these outcomes were associated with any occupational exposure at the plant, a cross-sectional survey was undertaken. METHODS: Rates of miscarriage, premature singleton birth, and major congenital anomaly occurring during employment were compared with a reference group comprised of all pregnancies that occurred before employment. RESULTS: Among female workers, the excess of congenital anomalies among female laboratory workers that defined the initial cluster was observed, but no specific pattern was found. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of these analyses, the increase in congenital anomalies could not be attributed to occupational exposures at the smelter nor could potential exposure likely explain the diverse anomalies described.


Subject(s)
Aluminum/adverse effects , Metallurgy , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Abortion, Spontaneous/epidemiology , Adult , Chi-Square Distribution , Congenital Abnormalities/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Medical Laboratory Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Pregnancy , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Sex Factors , Time Factors , Workforce
6.
Am J Epidemiol ; 171(3): 303-11, 2010 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20035011

ABSTRACT

This study examined whether externally rated job demand and control were associated with depression diagnosis claims in a heavy industrial cohort. The retrospective cohort sample consisted of 7,566 hourly workers aged 18-64 years who were actively employed at 11 US plants between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2003, and free of depression diagnosis claims during an initial 2-year run-in period. Logistic regression analysis was used to model the effect of tertiles of demand and control exposure on depression diagnosis claims. Demand had a significant positive association with depression diagnosis claims in bivariate models and models adjusted for demographic (age, gender, race, education, job grade, tenure) and lifestyle (smoking status, body mass index, cholesterol level) variables (high demand odds ratio = 1.39, 95% confidence interval: 1.04, 1.86). Control was associated with greater risk of depression diagnosis at moderate levels in unadjusted models only (odds ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval: 1.12, 1.93), while low control, contrary to expectation, was not associated with depression. The effects of the externally rated demand exposure were lost with adjustment for location. This may reflect differences in measurement or classification of exposure, differences in depression diagnosis by location, or other location-specific factors.


Subject(s)
Depression/diagnosis , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Work Schedule Tolerance/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/etiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Industry , Insurance Claim Review , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Psychological , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Health , Psychology/methods , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Self-Assessment , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
7.
J Occup Environ Med ; 51(3): 336-42, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19225419

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of workplace spirometry surveillance programs is unclear. We examine whether aluminum industry workers with airflow obstruction (AO) received health care for obstructive lung disease. METHODS: We performed a cross sectional analysis over 7 years of 6821 aluminum production workers. The primary outcome was the association between obstructive lung disease insurance claims and the presence of AO. We also examined whether the presence of claims was associated with increasing AO severity. RESULTS: Although workers with AO more frequently had claims, 60% of workers with AO, most frequently those with mild and borderline obstruction, had no claim. CONCLUSIONS: Workers with AO, particularly borderline and mild obstruction, frequently do not receive health care despite respiratory surveillance. Further investigation is needed to determine if workers with undiagnosed AO are symptomatic or have accelerated losses in lung function over time.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases, Obstructive/therapy , Occupational Health , Spirometry , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Industry , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Severity of Illness Index
8.
Am J Epidemiol ; 169(2): 161-6, 2009 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18996885

ABSTRACT

The objective of the study was to determine if female workers in a heavy manufacturing environment have a higher risk of injury compared with males when performing the same job and to evaluate sex differences in type or severity of injury. By use of human resources and incident surveillance data for the hourly population at 6 US aluminum smelters, injuries that occurred from January 1, 1996, through December 21, 2005, were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression, adjusted for job, tenure, and age category, was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for female versus male injury risk for all injuries, recordable injuries, and lost work time injuries. The analysis was repeated for acute injuries and musculoskeletal disorder-related injuries separately. Female workers in this industry have a greater risk for sustaining all forms of injury after adjustment for age, tenure, and standardized job category (odds ratio = 1.365, 95% confidence interval: 1.290, 1.445). This excess risk for female workers persisted when injuries were dichotomized into acute injuries (odds ratio = 1.2) and musculoskeletal disorder-related injuries (odds ratio = 1.1). This study provides evidence of a sex disparity in occupational injury with female workers at higher risk compared with their male counterparts in a heavy manufacturing environment.


Subject(s)
Aluminum/toxicity , Manufactured Materials/toxicity , Metallurgy , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Wounds and Injuries/etiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Sex Distribution , Sex Factors , United States/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology
9.
J Occup Environ Med ; 50(7): 840-51, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18617841

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To propose a standard measure of absenteeism (the work lost rate [WLR]) be included in future research to facilitate understanding and allow for translation of findings between scientific disciplines. METHODS: Hourly payroll data derived from "punch clock" reports was used to compare various measures of absenteeism used in the literature and the application of the proposed metric (N = 4000 workers). RESULTS: Unpaid hours and full absent days were highly correlated with the WLR (r = 0.896 to 0.898). The highest percentage of unpaid hours (lost work time) is captured by absence spells of 1 and 2 days duration. CONCLUSION: The proposed WLR metric captures: 1) The range and distribution of the individual WLRs, 2) the percentage of subjects with no unpaid hours, and 3) the population WLR and should be included whenever payroll data is used to measure absenteeism.


Subject(s)
Absenteeism , Salaries and Fringe Benefits , Sick Leave/economics , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Salaries and Fringe Benefits/statistics & numerical data , Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data
10.
J Occup Environ Med ; 50(2): 157-62, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18301172

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether beryllium-related disease exists among aluminum smelter workers. METHODS: A total of 1278 employees from four aluminum smelters determined to have significant beryllium exposure based on 5 years of sampling were invited to participate in medical surveillance that included a respiratory symptoms questionnaire, spirometry, and blood beryllium lymphocyte proliferation test. RESULTS: Of these, 734 employees participated in the program. Beryllium exposure from 965 personal samples ranged from 0.002 to 13.00 microg/m time-weighted average, with a median of 0.05 microg/m, geometric mean of 0.05 microg/m, and arithmetic mean of 0.22 microg/m. Only two employees had confirmed beryllium sensitization (0.27%). CONCLUSION: There is evidence of beryllium sensitization among aluminum smelter workers. When compared with beryllium-exposed workers in other industries, aluminum smelter workers had lower rates of sensitization. The low beryllium sensitization rate observed may be related to work practices and the properties of the beryllium found in this work environment.


Subject(s)
Beryllium/adverse effects , Occupational Diseases/blood , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Respiratory Tract Diseases/blood , Adult , Aluminum , Berylliosis/blood , Biomarkers/blood , Canada/epidemiology , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Metallurgy , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Population Surveillance , Respiratory Tract Diseases/chemically induced , Respiratory Tract Diseases/epidemiology , Spirometry , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology
11.
J Occup Environ Med ; 48(10): 1054-61, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17033505

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to demonstrate that health claims data, widely available due to the unique nature of the U.S. healthcare system, can be linked to other relevant databases such as personnel files and exposure data maintained by large employers. These data offer great potential for occupational health research. METHODS: In this article, we describe the process for linking claims data to industrial hygiene exposure data and personnel files of a single large employer to conduct epidemiologic research. RESULTS: Our results demonstrate the ability to replicate previously published findings using commonly maintained data sets and illustrate methodological issues that may arise as newer hypotheses are tested in this way. CONCLUSIONS: Health claims files offer potential for epidemiologic research in the United States, although the full extent and guidelines for successful application await further clarification through empiric research.


Subject(s)
Epidemiologic Methods , Health Services Research/methods , Insurance Claim Reporting/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Health/statistics & numerical data , Research/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aluminum , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection/methods , Female , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Reproducibility of Results , Research Design , United States
12.
J Occup Environ Med ; 48(3): 275-82, 2006 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16531831

ABSTRACT

Exposures to respiratory irritants encountered in aluminum smelters in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand have been suggested as the cause of "potroom asthma." However, there remains disagreement in North America regarding the existence of this entity. This study was designed to assess whether asthma occurs excessively among potroom workers and if so, delineate dose-response relationships for possible causal risk factors. The asthma incidence ratio between potroom and nonpotroom workers after adjusting for smoking was 1.40. Although bivariate analyses showed a relationship between asthma incidence and exposure to total fluoride, gaseous fluoride, particulate fluoride, sulfur dioxide, and smoking, only the effects of gaseous fluoride (relative risk [RR] = 5.1) and smoking (RR = 7.7) remained significant in a multivariate model. Potroom asthma appears to occur at the studied U.S. aluminum smelters at doses within regulatory guidelines.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Occupational/adverse effects , Aluminum , Asthma/epidemiology , Metallurgy , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Adult , Asthma/etiology , Coal Tar/adverse effects , Fluorides/adverse effects , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Likelihood Functions , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Occupations , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Sulfur Dioxide/adverse effects , United States/epidemiology
13.
Epidemiology ; 15(2): 240-4, 2004 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15127918

ABSTRACT

The most recent U.S. Census reported that Hispanics are now the nation's largest minority group. At the same time, increasing attention has focused on the inherent heterogeneity of the U.S. Hispanic population. Such a rapidly growing but heterogeneous minority poses potential challenges to population-based research. To understand those challenges better, we first considered the history of the demographers' question: "Who is Hispanic?" We then considered the implications of differing Hispanic identity criteria for disease surveillance. Although relevant to political and socioeconomic considerations, the Hispanic ethnic category may not be specifically useful for understanding most disease processes. For epidemiologic studies, there is need for more transparent criteria to classify subpopulations. Those criteria must be regularly subjected to analysis and validation.


Subject(s)
Hispanic or Latino/classification , Sentinel Surveillance , Health Surveys , Humans , United States/ethnology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...