Effects of implementing a vaccination tool in the electronic medical record on vaccination coverage of patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The rising incidence of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) requires innovative management strategies, including effective vaccination. We aimed to assess the impact of an electronic medical record (EMR)-integrated vaccination tool on vaccination coverage among patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), rheumatological and dermatological conditions. METHODS: A prospective observational study compared vaccination coverage before (2018) and after (2021) implementing the module. Vaccination data for influenza, pneumococcus, hepatitis B and tetanus, and potential predictors were collected from 1430 IMID patients (44.9% male, median age (interquartile range [IQR]) 54 (40-66) years, 789 with IBD, 604 with rheumatological and 37 with dermatological conditions). Data were analysed using McNemar, chi-square tests and multinominal logistic regression. RESULTS: Significant increases in pneumococcus (56.6% to 73.1%, p < .001) and hepatitis B vaccination (62.2% to 75.9%, p < .001) were observed. Influenza vaccination rates increased among IBD (76.2% to 80.5%, p = .006) but remained stable overall (73.1% to 73.2%, p = 1.000). Tetanus vaccination rates decreased (71.5% to 55.0%, p < .001). The proportion of fully vaccinated patients (against influenza in the past year for patients >50 years old and/or under immunosuppressive therapy, against pneumococcus in the past 5 years for patients >65 years old and/or under immunosuppressive therapy and additionally against hepatitis B for IBD patients) rose from 41.3% to 54.8% (p < .001 all using McNemar). Factors associated with vaccinations included age, immunosuppressive therapy and education level. CONCLUSIONS: Increased vaccination coverage was measured after implementing the vaccination tool. The COVID19 pandemic and the 2018 measurement might have increased vaccination awareness. Education of patients and healthcare professionals remains crucial.

Development of a set of measurable outcome indicators for Flemish patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

OBJECTIVE: Uniform and standardised quality measurement allows care assessment and improvement. Following a pragmatic consensus method we aimed to agree on a selection of measurable quality indicators that can be used to assess, benchmark and gradually improve inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care in Flanders. METHODS: Of 49 structures, 135 processes and 37 outcome indicators identified through literature, 58 were preselected and reformulated into measurable outcome indicators by four IBD physicians. A larger expert group scored the 58 indicators on a 10-point importance scale twice, endorsed by patient and expert perspectives in between rounds. Additional items could be suggested. A final selection and subset of indicators with room for improvement were agreed upon during a consensus meeting. RESULTS: Fifty indicators received an importance score of 7 or higher by ≥80% of the participants (seven IBD nurses, one abdominal surgeon, one chief medical officer and 31 IBD physicians including two paediatricians). Eight indicators scored highly important by 60-80%, two indicators reintroduced by patients and one newly suggested, were discussed during the consensus meeting. Among 26 participants, eight indicators were agreed to be added to the final selection. Of the 58 selected items, 19 were retained in the improvement subset, related to patient-reported outcomes, use of hospital services and survival, patient characteristics, monitoring of disease activity and remission, endoscopy guidelines, infection prevention, steroid and other medication use. CONCLUSION: Fifty-eight indicators were selected to assess IBD care in Flanders and a subset of 19 for use in clinical practice to steer quality improvement initiatives.

A Core Outcome Set for inflammatory bowel diseases: development and recommendations for implementation in clinical practice through an international multi-stakeholder consensus process.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Standardising health outcome measurements supports delivery of care, enables data-driven learning systems, and secondary data use for research. As part of the Health Outcomes Observatory initiative and building on existing knowledge, a core outcome set (COS) for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) was defined through an international modified Delphi method. METHODS: Stakeholders rated 90 variables on a 9-point importance scale twice, allowing score modification based on feedback displayed per stakeholder group. Two consecutive consensus meetings were held to discuss results and formulate recommendations for measurement in clinical practice. Variables scoring 7 or higher by ≥80% of the participants, or based on consensus meeting agreement, were included in the final set. RESULTS: In total, 136 stakeholders (45 IBD patients (advocates), 74 healthcare professionals/researchers, 13 industry representatives and 4 regulators), from 20 different countries participated. The final set includes 18 case-mix variables, 3 biomarkers (haemoglobin to detect anaemia, C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin to detect inflammation) for completeness and 28 outcomes (including 16 patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and 1 patient-reported experience). The PRO-2 and IBD-Control questionnaires were recommended to collect disease-specific PROs at every contact with an IBD practitioner, and the Subjective Health Experience model questionnaire, PROMIS Global Health and Self-Efficacy short form to collect generic PROs annually. CONCLUSIONS: A COS for IBD, including a recommendation for use in clinical practice, was defined. Implementation of this set will start in Vienna, Berlin, Barcelona, Leuven and Rotterdam, empowering patients to better manage their care. Additional centres will follow worldwide.

Position statement on the management of the immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis via multidisciplinary modified Delphi consensus.

INTRODUCTION: The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer immunotherapy has shown increased overall survival in a wide range of cancer types with the associated risk of developing severe immune-mediated adverse events, commonly involving the gastrointestinal tract. AIM: The aim of this position statement is to provide an updated practice advice to the gastroenterologists and oncologists on the diagnosis and management of ICI-induced gastrointestinal toxicity. METHODOLOGY: The evidence reviewed in this paper includes a comprehensive search strategy of English language publications. Consensus was reached using a three-round modified Delphi methodology and approved by the members of the Belgian Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research and Development Group (BIRD), Belgian Society of Medical Oncology (BSMO), Belgian group of Digestive Oncology (BGDO), and Belgian Respiratory Society (BeRS). CONCLUSIONS: The management of ICI-induced colitis requires an early multidisciplinary approach. A broad initial assessment is necessary (clinical presentation, laboratory markers, endoscopic and histologic examination) to confirm the diagnosis. Criteria for hospitalisation, management of ICIs, and initial endoscopic assessment are proposed. Even if corticosteroids are still considered the first-line therapy, biologics are recommended as an escalation therapy and as early treatment in patients with high-risk endoscopic findings.

Introduction of Subcutaneous Infliximab CT-P13 and Vedolizumab in Clinical Practice: A Multi-Stakeholder Position Statement Highlighting the Need for Post-Marketing Studies.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although subcutaneous formulations of infliximab CT-P13 and vedolizumab are registered for treating moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], many questions on their use remain unanswered. We set up a multi-stakeholder initiative resulting in a position statement. METHODS: Based on publicly available data, statements on subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab were developed and reviewed by 45 Belgian IBD physicians in a three-round modified Delphi process. During a consensus meeting, input from 16 IBD patients, nine IBD nurses and two clinical pharmacologists was provided and statements were further discussed, modified and scored. Statements achieving agreement by at least 70% of the IBD physicians were accepted. RESULTS: The Delphi process resulted in 79 agreed statements. In patients initiating intravenous therapy, IBD physicians would only consider switching to subcutaneous formulations in patients achieving both clinical and biological response [for Crohn's disease] or both clinical and endoscopic response [for ulcerative colitis]. For patients under maintenance therapy, switching to subcutaneous formulations was only considered in those achieving both clinical and endoscopic response while receiving standard dosing of infliximab or vedolizumab. While awaiting more scientific data, IBD physicians should consider weekly subcutaneous injections or switching back to an intravenous formulation in case of loss of response. Finally, switching to a subcutaneous formulation should always be a shared decision. CONCLUSIONS: All stakeholders welcomed subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab. However, more scientific data are needed to select the right patients and timing for switching to these newer formulations, and to explore the optimal strategy in case of loss of response.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease-related Behaviours [IBD-Bx] Questionnaire: Development, Validation and Prospective Associations with Fatigue.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Disease-related behaviours that may maintain or worsen symptom burden remain largely unexplored in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. In this study, we developed and validated an instrument assessing IBD-related, modifiable behaviours and explored which behaviours prospectively correlate with fatigue, a debilitating and common symptom in IBD. METHODS: Initially, 72 items reflecting IBD-related behaviours were generated based on literature review and input from clinicians and people diagnosed with IBD. During wave 1, 495 IBD patients rated to what extent each behaviour was applicable to them. Additionally, disease activity, fatigue, IBD-related concerns and psychological variables were assessed. During a follow-up visit 4-12 weeks later [wave 2], a random selection of 92 patients from wave 1 completed the measures assessing the IBD-related behaviours, disease activity and fatigue once more. RESULTS: A principal component analysis with oblique rotation revealed seven components in the 72 IBD behaviours, which could be interpreted as: [1] Avoiding food and activities, [2] Access to toilets, [3] Avoidance of sex, [4] Cognitive avoidance, [5] Not sharing with others, [6] Alternative treatments and [7] Disease management. Each component was reduced to three to five representative items, resulting in a final, 25-item IBD-Bx questionnaire showing good concurrent validity [alphas > 0.63] and reliability. Almost all components were cross-sectionally related to levels of fatigue. Avoiding food and activities and Access to toilets significantly predicted fatigue at wave 2 when controlling for baseline fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: The IBD-Bx is a valid and reliable questionnaire of IBD-related behaviours, some of which predict future fatigue burden.

Worries and concerns of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients in Belgium - a validation of the Dutch rating form.

OBJECTIVES: Worry is the most common psychological complaint among patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). This study aimed to translate and test the psychometric properties the Rating Form of IBD Patient Concerns (RFIPC) among Dutch-speaking patients with IBD in Belgium. It also aimed to describe worries and concerns, and to examine possible differences in worry patterns between patients with different disease types and disease activities. METHODS: The RFIPC was translated into Dutch following the guidelines of the Rome Foundation and was completed by patients with Crohn's disease (CD, n = 336) and ulcerative colitis (UC, n = 160). To test concurrent validity, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) were used. Factor structure was examined with confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: The four-factor structure including subscales 'impact of the disease', 'sexual intimacy', 'complications of the disease' and 'body stigma' was confirmed in the Dutch sample. All factors had high internal consistency (>.70). Correlations with DASS-21 suggest good concurrent validity, all rs>.30, ps<.001. No differences in the RFIPC scores were observed between patients with CD and UC. Patients with active disease (53%) had higher scores than patients in remission (47%). Across all groups, the order of top concerns was consistent and included worries about energy level, side effects of medication, having an ostomy bag/surgery, and uncertain nature of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: The Dutch version of the RFIPC is a valid and reliable measure of IBD-specific worries and concerns which can be used in both research and clinical settings.