Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Food Chem ; 255: 348-356, 2018 Jul 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29571486

ABSTRACT

Caramel colours are used by the food industry in a wide range of foods and beverages. During their manufacturing, low molecular weight compounds such as 4-methylimidazole (4-MEI), the structural isomer of 4-MEI, 2-methylimidazole (2-MEI) and 2-acetyl-4-tetrahydroxy-butylimidazole (THI) are generated. The presence of these inevitable by-products of caramel manufacturing can be hazardous to human health. This publication describes an isotope dilution Ultra-High-performance Liquid Chromatography tandem mass spectrometric method (UHPLC-MS/MS) that was developed and validated for the simultaneous quantification of these impurities in both beverages/liquids and foods. A limit of quantification of 5 µg/kg was obtained for 4-MEI and THI. The expanded measurement uncertainty (U; k = 2) for these compounds was below 51% in beverages/liquids and below 56% in foods. As higher measurement uncertainties were obtained for 2-MEI, the developed analytical procedure can only be used in a semi-quantitative way for this compound.


Subject(s)
Beverages/analysis , Carbohydrates/analysis , Food Analysis/methods , Food , Imidazoles/analysis , Chromatography, Liquid , Isotopes/analysis , Tandem Mass Spectrometry
2.
Food Chem ; 255: 372-379, 2018 Jul 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29571489

ABSTRACT

In Europe, 2-acetyl-4-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydroxybutyl)imidazole (THI) and 4-methylimidazole (4-MEI) are - to a certain level - allowed to be present in the food colours ammonia caramel (E 150c) and sulphite ammonia caramel (E 150d). Besides their presence in food colours, exposure to these contaminants may also include other dietary sources. This study describes the occurrence of THI and 4-MEI in a wide variety of food products (n = 522) purchased from the Belgian market and their dietary intake in Belgian consumers from 15 years old onwards. THI was found to be present in 22.4% of the investigated foods at a level up to 551 µg/kg. For 4-MEI (57.7% quantifiable), concentrations up to 2,835 µg/kg were observed. The average dietary intake amounted to 0.02-0.36 µg kg-1 bw-1 day for THI and 0.4-3.7 µg kg-1 bw-1 day for 4-MEI. Coffee, cola and beer were contributing most to the dietary THI and 4-MEI intake in Belgium.


Subject(s)
Beverages/analysis , Carbohydrates/analysis , Food Analysis/methods , Food , Imidazoles/analysis , Beer/analysis , Belgium , Coffee/chemistry , Eating
3.
Sci Total Environ ; 568: 770-784, 2016 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27169730

ABSTRACT

MERLIN-Expo is a library of models that was developed in the frame of the FP7 EU project 4FUN in order to provide an integrated assessment tool for state-of-the-art exposure assessment for environment, biota and humans, allowing the detection of scientific uncertainties at each step of the exposure process. This paper describes the main features of the MERLIN-Expo tool. The main challenges in exposure modelling that MERLIN-Expo has tackled are: (i) the integration of multimedia (MM) models simulating the fate of chemicals in environmental media, and of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models simulating the fate of chemicals in human body. MERLIN-Expo thus allows the determination of internal effective chemical concentrations; (ii) the incorporation of a set of functionalities for uncertainty/sensitivity analysis, from screening to variance-based approaches. The availability of such tools for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis aimed to facilitate the incorporation of such issues in future decision making; (iii) the integration of human and wildlife biota targets with common fate modelling in the environment. MERLIN-Expo is composed of a library of fate models dedicated to non biological receptor media (surface waters, soils, outdoor air), biological media of concern for humans (several cultivated crops, mammals, milk, fish), as well as wildlife biota (primary producers in rivers, invertebrates, fish) and humans. These models can be linked together to create flexible scenarios relevant for both human and wildlife biota exposure. Standardized documentation for each model and training material were prepared to support an accurate use of the tool by end-users. One of the objectives of the 4FUN project was also to increase the confidence in the applicability of the MERLIN-Expo tool through targeted realistic case studies. In particular, we aimed at demonstrating the feasibility of building complex realistic exposure scenarios and the accuracy of the modelling predictions through a comparison with actual measurements.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/analysis , Environmental Pollutants/analysis , Environmental Pollutants/pharmacokinetics , Models, Biological , Organic Chemicals/analysis , Organic Chemicals/pharmacokinetics , Animals , Biota/physiology , Crops, Agricultural/chemistry , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Europe , Fresh Water/chemistry , Humans , Milk/chemistry , Multimedia , Predictive Value of Tests , Risk Assessment , Uncertainty
4.
Environ Int ; 73: 117-27, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25113625

ABSTRACT

In this study, a semi-probabilistic modelling approach was applied for the estimation of the long-term human dietary exposure to phthalates--one of world's most used families of plasticisers. Four phthalate compounds were considered: diethyl phthalate (DEP), di-n-butyl phthalate (DnBP), benzylbutyl phthalate (BBP) and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP). Intake estimates were calculated for the Belgian adult population and several subgroups of this population for two considered scenarios using an extended version of the EN-forc model. The highest intake rates were found for DEHP, followed by DnBP, BBP and DEP. In the Belgian adult population, men and young adults generally had the highest dietary phthalate intake estimates. Nevertheless, predicted dietary intake rates for all four investigated phthalates were far below the corresponding tolerable daily intake (TDI) values (i.e. P99 intake values were 6.4% of the TDI at most), which is reassuring because adults are also exposed to phthalates via other contamination pathways (e.g. dust ingestion and inhalation). The food groups contributing most to the dietary exposure were grains and grain-based products for DEP, milk and dairy products for DnBP, meat and meat products or grains and grain-based products (depending on the scenario) for BBP and meat and meat products for DEHP. Comparison of the predicted intake results based on modelled phthalate concentrations in food products with intake estimates from other surveys (mostly based on measured concentrations) showed that the extended version of the EN-forc model is a suitable semi-probabilistic tool for the estimation and evaluation of the long-term dietary intake of phthalates in humans.


Subject(s)
Environmental Pollutants/analysis , Food Contamination/analysis , Models, Statistical , Phthalic Acids/analysis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Dibutyl Phthalate/analysis , Diet , Diethylhexyl Phthalate/analysis , Environmental Exposure , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment , Young Adult
5.
Environ Res ; 133: 282-93, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24981827

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to predict the occurrence of four phthalates, two polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and two polychlorinated dibenzofurans in environmental and agricultural media from observed concentrations in air, sludge, manure and concentrate. For the environmental and agricultural fate modelling, the newly developed multimedia model "EN-forc" (ENvironmental Food transfer model for ORganic Contaminants) was used. To validate EN-forc calculations, the predicted concentrations of the considered chemicals in soil, groundwater, drinking water, plants and animal products were compared with both observed and modelled concentrations available in the literature. For the majority of the considered matrices, predicted phthalate and dioxin levels differed one order of magnitude at most with observed concentrations. Unfortunately, the transfer models implemented in EN-forc lacked power to predict levels of some phthalates and dioxins in pasture, root crops and/or tubers. Concentrations of phthalates and dioxins in offal could not be predicted due to the absence of suitable models that have an acceptable level of complexity to implement in EN-forc. For this type of food products, further research is highly encouraged. In a next step, the modelling framework of EN-forc will be extended in order to be able to predict human dietary exposure to organic chemicals like phthalates and dioxins.


Subject(s)
Benzofurans/chemistry , Crops, Agricultural/chemistry , Dioxins/chemistry , Environmental Pollutants/chemistry , Models, Chemical , Phthalic Acids/chemistry , Agriculture , Animals , Benzofurans/adverse effects , Crops, Agricultural/adverse effects , Dibenzofurans, Polychlorinated , Dioxins/adverse effects , Environmental Pollutants/adverse effects , Humans , Phthalic Acids/adverse effects , Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins/adverse effects , Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins/chemistry , Solubility
6.
Environ Int ; 51: 1-7, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23138015

ABSTRACT

This survey determined the levels of eight phthalates - i.e. dimethyl phthalate (DMP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), diisobutyl phthalate (DiBP), di-n-butyl phthalate (DnBP), benzylbutyl phthalate (BzBP), di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP) and di-n-octyl phthalate (DnOP) - in several Belgian milk and dairy products. Samples were obtained from various farms, a dairy factory and from different shops in order to investigate phthalate contamination "from farm to fork". At several stages in the milk chain, product contamination with phthalates - mostly DiBP, DnBP, BzBP and DEHP - was observed. At farm level, the mechanical milking process and the intake of phthalate containing feed by the cattle were found to be possible contamination sources. At industry and retail level, contact materials including packaging materials were additional contamination sources for phthalates in milk and dairy products.


Subject(s)
Dairy Products/analysis , Environmental Pollutants/analysis , Food Contamination/analysis , Phthalic Acids/analysis , Animals , Belgium , Cattle , Dairy Products/statistics & numerical data , Dibutyl Phthalate/analogs & derivatives , Dibutyl Phthalate/analysis , Diethylhexyl Phthalate/analysis , Food Contamination/statistics & numerical data , Milk/chemistry , Plasticizers/analysis
7.
Food Chem Toxicol ; 50(12): 4428-35, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22985986

ABSTRACT

Food products can be contaminated with toxic compounds via the environment. Another possibility of food contamination is that toxicants are generated in foods or that chemicals migrate from food contact materials into foods during processing. In this study, the effect of cooking at home on the levels of phthalates - world's most used group of plasticisers - in various food types (starchy products, vegetables and meat and fish) was examined. Eight compounds were considered, namely dimethyl phthalate (DMP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), diisobutyl phthalate (DiBP), di-n-butyl phthalate (DnBP), benzylbutyl phthalate (BBP), di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP) and di-n-octyl phthalate (DnOP). Food products were analysed before as well as after cooking (boiling, steaming, (deep-)frying or grilling). In general, phthalate concentrations in foods declined after cooking, except in vegetables, where almost no effect was seen. Several factors influenced the degree of this decline (e.g. weight difference, fat uptake, etc.). Of all phthalates, DEHP, DiBP and BBP were affected the most. In conclusion, cooking at home definitely affected phthalate concentrations in foods and thus needs to be considered in order to correctly assess humans' dietary exposure to these contaminants.


Subject(s)
Cooking/methods , Food Analysis , Phthalic Acids/analysis , Phthalic Acids/toxicity , Animals , Dibutyl Phthalate/analogs & derivatives , Dibutyl Phthalate/analysis , Dibutyl Phthalate/toxicity , Diethylhexyl Phthalate/analysis , Diethylhexyl Phthalate/toxicity , Fishes , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry , Humans , Meat/analysis , Plasticizers/analysis , Plasticizers/toxicity , Swine , Vegetables/chemistry
8.
Food Chem Toxicol ; 50(8): 2945-53, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22659009

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the occurrence of dimethyl phthalate (DMP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), diisobutyl phthalate (DiBP), di-n-butyl phthalate (DnBP), benzylbutyl phthalate (BBP), di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP) and di-n-octyl phthalate (DnOP) in raw cow's milk and feed from Belgian farms in order to determine their most relevant contamination pathways in milk. Measurable levels of DMP, DEP, DnBP, DCHP and DnOP were found in various feed samples, although they were not observed in milk. A plausible explanation for this is that they are rapidly metabolised in cows. DEHP and in a smaller degree also DiBP and BBP levels in milk seemed to vary across seasons and farms. DiBP and BBP levels were lower in summer than in winter milk, which was in contrast with what was observed for DEHP. This is possibly due to another feed composition during summer and winter. Comparing BBP and DEHP concentrations in manually with those in mechanically obtained milk revealed that, besides environmental contamination via feed ingestion, contact materials used during the mechanical milking process is another important contamination pathway. Concentrations observed in this study confirm the decreasing trend of DEHP in European cow's milk owing to the substitution of DEHP by other plasticisers.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed , Milk/chemistry , Phthalic Acids/analysis , Animals , Cattle , Groundwater/chemistry , Seasons , Soil Pollutants/analysis , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis
9.
Food Chem Toxicol ; 50(7): 2575-83, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22554646

ABSTRACT

Phthalates are organic lipophilic compounds that are principally used as plasticiser to increase the flexibility of plastic polymers. Other applications are a.o. the use of phthalates in printing inks and lacquers. Human exposure to phthalates mainly occurs via food ingestion and can induce adverse health effects. In this study, the presence of eight phthalate compounds--dimethyl phthalate (DMP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), diisobutyl phthalate (DiBP), di-n-butyl phthalate (DnBP), benzylbutyl phthalate (BBP), di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP) and di-n-octyl phthalate (DnOP)--was investigated in 400 food products, divided over eleven groups, and packages sold on the Belgian market. For this purpose, suitable extraction techniques were developed and validated for four different matrices, namely high-fat foods, low-fat food products, aqueous-based beverages and packaging materials. The instrumental analysis was performed by means of gas chromatography-low resolution-mass spectrometry with electron impact ionisation (GC-EI-MS). A wide variety of phthalate concentrations was observed in the different groups. DEHP was found in the highest concentration in almost every group. Moreover, DEHP was the most abundant phthalate compound, followed by DiBP, DnBP and BBP. This survey is part of the PHTAL project, which is the first project that discusses phthalate contamination on the Belgian food market.


Subject(s)
Food Packaging , Phthalic Acids/analysis , Belgium
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...