Longer is Better for Endoscopic Follow-up of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma After Ureteroscopic Treatment: An Evaluation Spanning 10 Years of Data.

BACKGROUND: Tumour recurrences are frequent among patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with ureteroscopy (URS). Therefore, guidelines recommend a strict follow-up regimen, but there is little evidence on how to do this. OBJECTIVE: To analyse outcomes during our follow-up regimen and the impact on treatment in terms of ipsilateral UTUC recurrence, treatment conversion, and tumour upgrading, and to evaluate potential prognostic factors, including second-look URS outcomes. A secondary objective was to evaluate survival outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The single-centre cohort included all adult patients with nonmetastatic UTUC treated with URS from January 2010 to December 2020. Follow-up involved endoscopy at 3-mo intervals in the first year, then at 6-mo intervals up to year 3, and yearly thereafter. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive analyses were performed for the follow-up outcomes. The Andersen-Gill model for recurrent event analysis was used to analyse tumour recurrences, and multivariable Cox regression to analyse for predictors for treatment conversion in low-grade tumours. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We analysed 71 patients with median follow-up of 49.5 mo. The overall 2-yr recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was 22%. In low-grade disease, the 1-yr RFS rate was 50% and the 2-yr RFS rate was 29%. Treatment was converted to radical nephroureterectomy for 23 patients, at a median time to conversion of 9.9 mo. Upgrading was seen in 13 patients, at a median time to upgrading of 21.9 mo. No factors were prognostic for either tumour recurrence or treatment conversion. The 5-yr OS, CSS, and MFS rates were 82%, 86%, and 84%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that it is rational to extend endoscopic follow-up for UTUC treated with URS, as clinically relevant events (treatment conversion and tumour upgrading) occur beyond the current 6-mo guideline recommendation. Second-look URS outcomes were not prognostic for tumour recurrence or treatment conversion during follow-up. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our study results show that for patients with cancer of the upper urinary tract treated with kidney-sparing surgery through a small telescope called a ureteroscope (URS), most of the clinically relevant events (treatment conversion and tumour upgrading) occur outside the current recommended follow-up of 6 months. Therefore, URS follow-up should be extended for these patients.

Positioning the role of urine cytology within the diagnostic pathway for UTUC: supportive but inconclusive.

PURPOSE: With the introduction of kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) for low-risk Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC), correct risk-stratification has become crucial. High-grade cytology is one of the decisive variables to stratify a tumor as high-risk. To position the role of urine cytology in the diagnostic pathway of UTUC patients, we evaluated the accuracy of urine cytology by comparing the outcomes with histopathology. METHOD: Patients with UTUC evaluated between 2010 and 2020, and diagnosed by imaging, cytology and histopathology were selected. Descriptive statistics were used to compare cytology with histopathological outcomes using crosstabs. Clinical performance characteristics of cytology were determined for the presence of a malignancy. RESULTS: This study included 176 patients with confirmed histopathological UTUC. Concordance between cytology and biopsy results was found in 14.8% of low-grade tumors and 16.8% of high-grade tumors. Comparing cytology with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) specimens revealed concordance rates of 1.6% for low-grade tumors and 22.9% for high-grade tumors. Notably, 51.1% of urine cytology results were false negative. Sensitivity for detecting high-grade and low-grade tumors with a positive urine cytology was 56.6% and 52.6%, respectively, with specificities of 54.8% and 37.2%. CONCLUSION: In the current study, cytology appears to exhibit limited reliability when used as a sole diagnostic tool for assessing tumor grade and consequently risk stratification. It is imperative to recognize these limitations, optimize urine sampling techniques, and leverage a combination of diverse diagnostic methods for the most effective and individualized treatment decision-making.

One-fourth of COVID-19 patients have an impaired pulmonary function after 12 months of disease onset.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing data that show a persistently impaired pulmonary function upon recovery after severe infection. Little is known however about the extent, recovery and determinants of pulmonary impairment across the full spectrum of COVID-19 severity over time. METHODS: In a well characterized, prospective cohort of both hospitalised and non-hospitalised individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection, the RECoVERED study, pulmonary function (diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO)) and spirometry) was measured until one year after disease onset. Additionally, data on sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, symptoms, and health-related quality of life (HRQL) were collected. Pulmonary function and these determinants were modelled over time using mixed-effect linear regression. Determinants of pulmonary function impairment at 12 months after disease onset were identified using logistic regression. FINDINGS: Between May 2020 and December 2021, 301 of 349 participants underwent at least one pulmonary function test. After one year of follow-up, 25% of the participants had an impaired pulmonary function which translates in 11%, 22%, and 48% of the participants with mild, moderate and severe/critical COVID-19. Improvement in DLCO among the participants continued over the period across one, six and twelve months. Being older, having more than three comorbidities (p<0·001) and initial severe/critical disease (p<0·001) were associated with slower improvement of pulmonary function over time, adjusted for age and sex. HRQL improved over time and at 12 months was comparable to individuals without impaired pulmonary function. INTERPRETATION: The prevalence of impaired pulmonary function after twelve months of follow-up, was still significant among those with initially moderate or severe/critical COVID-19. Pulmonary function increased over time in most of the severity groups. These data imply that guidelines regarding revalidation after COVID-19 should target individuals with moderate and severe/critical disease severities.