ABSTRACT
Distraction osteogenesis is a viable treatment option for patients with a cleft associated with severe maxillary retrusion. A rigid external distraction device and a hybrid internal maxillary distractor have been used to advance the maxilla allowing for predictable and stable results. These techniques can be applied by itself or as an adjunct to traditional orthognathic procedures. The technical aspects are presented. These procedures tend to be simpler and demonstrate great stability compared to traditional surgical methods. The reasons for stability are discussed.
Subject(s)
Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/surgery , Maxilla/surgery , Osteogenesis, Distraction/instrumentation , Osteotomy, Le Fort/instrumentation , Female , Humans , Male , Maxilla/abnormalities , Osteogenesis, Distraction/methods , Osteotomy, Le Fort/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The anatomy of children with severe Pierre Robin sequence can present a challenge for direct laryngoscopy and intubation. Advanced techniques including flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopic intubation have been described but require highly specialized skill and equipment. Rigid video laryngoscopy is more accessible but has not been described in this population. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A retrospective review was completed at a tertiary care center of all children between January 2016 and March 2020 with Pierre Robin sequence who underwent a mandibular distraction osteogenesis procedure. Intubation events were collected, and a descriptive analysis was performed. A univariate logistic regression model was applied to direct laryngoscopy and flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy with rigid video laryngoscopy as a reference. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were identified with a total of 56 endotracheal events. All patients were successfully intubated. Direct laryngoscopy was successful at first intubation attempt in 47.3% (9/19) of events. Six direct laryngoscopy events required switching to another device. Rigid video laryngoscopy was successful at first intubation attempt in 80.5% (29/36) of events. Two cases required switching to another device. Flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy was found successful at first intubation attempt in 88.9% (8/9) of events. Direct laryngoscopy was 4 times more likely to fail first intubation attempt when compared to rigid video laryngoscopy (P < .05). There was no significant difference between rigid video laryngoscopy and flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy for intubation. CONCLUSIONS: For children with Pierre Robin sequence rigid video laryngoscopy should be considered as a first attempt intubation device both in the operating room and for emergent situations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:1647-1651, 2021.
Subject(s)
Airway Obstruction/surgery , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Laryngoscopy/methods , Pierre Robin Syndrome/complications , Adolescent , Airway Obstruction/etiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Equipment Failure , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intubation, Intratracheal/instrumentation , Laryngoscopes , Laryngoscopy/instrumentation , Male , Mandible/abnormalities , Mandible/surgery , Osteogenesis, Distraction , Pierre Robin Syndrome/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Distraction osteogenesis is effective for correction of severe maxillary and midface hypoplasia. The vectors controlling the segment to be moved must be planned. This requires knowledge of the physical characteristics of the osteotomized bone segment, including the location of the center of mass (free body) and the center of resistance (restrained body). The purpose of this study was to determine the center of mass of the osteotomized monobloc, Le Fort III, and Le Fort I bone segments. METHODS: A dry human skull was used to sequentially isolate three bone segments: monobloc, Le Fort III, and Le Fort I. Each segment was suspended from three different points, and digital photographs were obtained from each suspension. The photographs were digitally superimposed. The center of mass was determined by calculating the intersection of the suspension lines. RESULTS: The center of mass for the monobloc segment was located at a point 43.5 percent of the total height from the occlusal plane to the superior edge of the frontal bone supraorbital osteotomy. For the Le Fort III, it was located 38 percent of the total height from the occlusal plane to the superior edge of the osteotomized base of the nasal bones. For the Le Fort I, it was 53 percent of the total height from the occlusal plane to the superior edge of the osteotomized maxillary bone. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the location of the center of mass in the monobloc, Le Fort III, and Le Fort I segments provides a starting point for the clinician when planning vectors for advancement with distraction.
