ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of postoperative gum chewing on the recovery of bowel motility after caesarean section. DESIGN: A randomised controlled study. SETTING: Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Egypt. POPULATION: A total of 200 pregnant women delivered by elective caesarean section (CS) under general anaesthesia. METHODS: Women were randomised into two groups; group A (93 women) who received one stick of sugarless gum for 15 minutes every 2 hours after surgery, and group B (107 women) had traditional management (oral intake of clear fluids allowed after passage of flatus and regular diet with the passage of bowel movement). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to first hearing of normal intestinal sounds, time to first flatus, time to first bowel movement and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: The mean duration of surgery was longer in group A (41.3 +/- 7.5 versus 38.4 +/- 8.1 minutes, P < 0.05). The mean postoperative time interval to first hearing of normal intestinal sounds (10.9 +/- 2.7 versus 15.6 +/- 3.7 hours), passage of flatus (17.9 +/- 4.6 versus 24.4 +/- 7.1 hours), defecation (21.1 +/- 4.7 versus 30 +/- 8.2 hours) and discharge from the hospital (40.8 +/- 10.6 versus 50.5 +/- 8.9 hours) were significantly shorter in group A (P < 0.001). Severe ileus occurred only in one woman belonging to group B. All patients in group A tolerated gum chewing beginning on the first postoperative day. CONCLUSION: Gum chewing after CS is safe, well tolerated, and associated with rapid resumption of intestinal motility and shorter hospital stay; with potential impact on reducing the overall healthcare costs in case of routine implementation.
Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Chewing Gum , Gastrointestinal Motility/physiology , Postoperative Care/methods , Adult , Defecation/physiology , Female , Gases , Humans , Length of Stay , Pregnancy , Time FactorsABSTRACT
PIP: Clinical experience, and a pathology study, of 184 women on Neogynon (.25 mg d-norgestrel and .05 mg of 17-ethinyl estradiol, micro 20) was assessed for a total of 3129 cycles. 53 women were nursing babies before use of the pill, and 44 continued to do so throughout pill usage. Endometrial biopsies were taken premenstrually, during the period of full hormonal effect, for 40 cases before and then 6-12 months after initiation of pill usage; biopsies were studied for effect of the combined steroid on the building up of endometrium. The combination pill was 100% effective, with no failures. 23 cases (12.5%) failed to continue through the 18th cycle. 4 cases stopped after the 2nd cycle and 6 more after the 4th; the remaining stopped after the 12th cycle. No change in menstrual pattern was noticed in 136 (73.9%) of the cases; 14 presented with menorrhagia and endometrial biopsy of one of these showed regressive and mixed endometrial changes. 2 cases of intermenstrual spotting were reported. Hypomenorrhea was reported in 16 cases. Side effects were generally effects on the central nervous system: 7 cases of headache and dizziness, 7 cases of mild depression, and 3 cases of sexual anorexia. No gastrointestinal side effects were reported. 44 cases (of 53) continued lactation, and 9 noticed a progressive decrease in the amount of milk produced. 8 cases gained weight and 13 lost, 2 enough to quit using the pills. Hair loss was a noticeable complaint in 5 cases. Endometrial biopsies revealed grades of arrest of endometrial development. 85% showed a resting endometrial pattern, whereas 15% were atrophic. Endometrial response was rather irregular and mainly of the mixed type in 90% of the cases and about 10% were proliferative.^ieng