ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to analyze the existing literature investigating respiratory functioning in people with Persistent Somatic Symptoms (PSS) compared to healthy controls, to identify patterns of respiratory disturbances by symptom or syndrome, and describe any respiratory outcomes consistent across diagnoses. METHODS: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. A comprehensive search was carried out across five databases (PubMed (NCBI), PsycArticles (Ovid), Web of Science (Core Collection), Embase, and Scopus) using two customised search strings for persistent somatic symptoms and objective respiratory parameters. Title/abstract screening and data extraction were carried out independently by two reviewers. The modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment of the studies. Studies investigating baseline respiratory functioning in adult patients with PSS compared to healthy controls, using at least one objective respiratory were included. RESULTS: 18 studies met the inclusion criteria for the review, with a pooled sample size of n = 3245. Chronic pain conditions were found to be the most prevalent subset of diagnoses of interest, comprising six of the studies. 10 studies included measures of lung capacity, flow and/or volume, nine studies reported measures of ventilation, and four studies investigated respiratory muscle functioning. 13 of the included studies reported significant differences in at least one objective respiratory measure between groups (at rest). Scores on self-reported measures of dysnpea and breathlessness were higher in patients compared to healthy controls, while objective respiratory outcomes were varied. CONCLUSION: The current systematic review is consistent with previous literature suggesting more pronounced experiences of breathlessness in patients with PSS, and significant disparities between reported dyspnea and objective respiratory outcomes. Research investigating the uncoupling between subjective and objective respiratory outcomes is needed to understand the mechanisms behind breathing disturbances in PSS.
Subject(s)
Medically Unexplained Symptoms , Humans , Observational Studies as Topic , Respiration Disorders/physiopathologyABSTRACT
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive technique that could improve cognitive function. It is being developed as a non-pharmacological intervention to alleviate symptoms of cognitive deterioration. We assessed the efficacy of rTMS in improving cognitive functioning among people with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) in a partially-blinded, sham-controlled randomized trial. Out of 91 subjects screened, 31 participants with MCI (mean age 70.73; SD = 4.47), were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (A) Active rTMS; (B) Active rTMS with Computerized Cognitive Training RehaCom; and (C) Sham control. The study evaluated cognitive function using the DemTect, FAS, and CANTAB tests before and after the stimulation. The following treatment protocol was applied: 2000 pulses at 10 Hz, 5-s train duration, and 25-s intervals at 110% of resting MT delivered over the left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) five times a week for 2 weeks. After 10 sessions of high-frequency rTMS, there was an improvement in overall cognitive function and memory, assessed by the DemTect evaluation, with no serious adverse effects. Analysis of differences in time (after 10 sessions) between studied groups showed statistically significant improvement in DemTect total score (time by group interaction p = 0.026) in favor of rTMS+RehaCom. The linear regression of CANTAB Paired Associates Learning revealed significant differences in favor of rTMS+RehaCom in three subtests. Our study shows that 10 sessions of rTMS over the left DLPFC (alone as well as combined with Computerized Cognitive Training) can have a positive impact on cognitive function in people with MCI. Further research should investigate the underlying mechanism and determine the optimal parameters for rTMS, which will be important for its efficacy in clinical settings.
