Brain aspergilloma in an immunocompetent individual: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Aspergillosis is caused by fungi from the Aspergillus species, mainly Aspergillus fumigatus. Patients with aspergillosis typically have an underlying immunosuppression, and it is rare within the central nervous system (CNS) in an immunocompetent host. The mortality rate is as high as 90% if untreated, and the diagnosis is usually delayed due to nonspecific clinical presentation. This study described a case of CNS aspergillosis in an immunocompetent patient, through which we sought to discuss the current knowledge regarding brain Aspergillus focusing in the immunocompetent host. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 45-year-old male presented with 2 years of low-intensity headache and history of chronic sinusitis with epistaxis in the left nostril. Fifteen days before admission, he had high-intensity headache, episodes of transient aphasia, and seizure. Imaging showed a contrast-enhancing mass within the left maxillary sinus and another lesion in the left frontal lobe. The left frontal craniotomy was conducted, and complete resection was achieved. Biopsy identified A. fumigatus, and antifungal therapy was initiated. After 2 weeks, a new lesion was detected in the right frontal lobe, and the patient underwent a new procedure with complete lesion resection. Follow-up at 3 weeks did not reveal any evidence of residual or recurrent disease. The patient did not develop neurological complaints and was referred for resection of the remaining lesion by an otolaryngology team. CONCLUSION: Being one of the few cases reporting a successful outcome for brain aspergilloma in an immunocompetent patient after complete surgical resection and amphotericin B and itraconazole therapy, we sought to reveal novel insight into brain aspergillosis.

Pontine encephalocele and abnormalities of the posterior fossa following transclival endoscopic endonasal surgery.

OBJECT: Transclival endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) has recently been used for the treatment of posterior fossa tumors. The optimal method of reconstruction of large clival defects following EES has not been established. METHODS: A morphometric analysis of the posterior fossa was performed in patients who underwent transclival EES to compare those with observed postoperative anatomical changes (study group) to 50 normal individuals (anatomical control group) and 41 matched transclival cases with preserved posterior fossa anatomy (case-control group) using the same parameters. Given the absence of clival bone following transclival EES, the authors used the line between the anterior commissure and the basion as an equivalent to the clival plane to evaluate the location of the pons. Four parameters were studied and compared in the two populations: the pontine location/displacement, the maximum anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the pons, the maximum AP diameter of the fourth ventricle, and the cervicomedullary angle (CMA). All measurements were performed on midsagittal 3-month postoperative MR images in the study group. RESULTS: Among 103 posterior fossa tumors treated with transclival EES, 14 cases (13.6%) with postoperative posterior fossa anatomy changes were identified. The most significant change was anterior displacement of the pons (transclival pontine encephalocele) compared with the normal location in the anatomical control group (p < 0.0001). Other significant deformities were expansion of the AP diameter of the pons (p = 0.005), enlargement of the fourth ventricle (p = 0.001), and decrease in the CMA (p < 0.0001). All patients who developed these changes had undergone extensive resection of the clival bone (> 50% of the clivus) and dura. Nine (64.3%) of the 14 patients were overweight (body mass index [BMI] > 25 kg/m(2)). An association between BMI and the degree of pontine encephalocele was observed, but did not reach statistical significance. The use of a fat graft as part of the reconstruction technique following transclival EES with dural opening was the single significant factor that prevented pontine displacement (p = 0.02), associated with 91% lower odds of pontine encephalocele (OR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.77). The effect of fat graft reconstruction was more pronounced in overweight/obese individuals (p = 0.04) than in normal-weight patients (p = 0.52). Besides reconstruction technique, other noticeable findings were the tendency of younger adults to develop pontine encephalocele (p = 0.05) and the association of postoperative meningitis with the development of posterior fossa deformities (p = 0.05). One patient developed a transient, recurrent subjective diplopia; all others remained asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: Significant changes in posterior fossa anatomy that have potential clinical implications have been observed following transclival transdural EES. These changes are more common in younger patients or those with meningitis and may be associated with BMI. The use of a fat graft combined with the vascularized nasoseptal flap appears to minimize the risk of pontine herniation following transclival EES with dural opening.

Quality assessment of a new surgical simulator for neuroendoscopic training.

OBJECT: Ideal surgical training models should be entirely reliable, atoxic, easy to handle, and, if possible, low cost. All available models have their advantages and disadvantages. The choice of one or another will depend on the type of surgery to be performed. The authors created an anatomical model called the S.I.M.O.N.T. (Sinus Model Oto-Rhino Neuro Trainer) Neurosurgical Endotrainer, which can provide reliable neuroendoscopic training. The aim in the present study was to assess both the quality of the model and the development of surgical skills by trainees. METHODS: The S.I.M.O.N.T. is built of a synthetic thermoretractable, thermosensible rubber called Neoderma, which, combined with different polymers, produces more than 30 different formulas. Quality assessment of the model was based on qualitative and quantitative data obtained from training sessions with 9 experienced and 13 inexperienced neurosurgeons. The techniques used for evaluation were face validation, retest and interrater reliability, and construct validation. RESULTS: The experts considered the S.I.M.O.N.T. capable of reproducing surgical situations as if they were real and presenting great similarity with the human brain. Surgical results of serial training showed that the model could be considered precise. Finally, development and improvement in surgical skills by the trainees were observed and considered relevant to further training. It was also observed that the probability of any single error was dramatically decreased after each training session, with a mean reduction of 41.65% (range 38.7%-45.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Neuroendoscopic training has some specific requirements. A unique set of instruments is required, as is a model that can resemble real-life situations. The S.I.M.O.N.T. is a new alternative model specially designed for this purpose. Validation techniques followed by precision assessments attested to the model's feasibility.