Adherence to statin treatment following a myocardial infarction: an Italian population-based survey.

BACKGROUND: Statins are standard therapies after myocardial infarction (MI) in the general population. In the current study, we assessed adherence to statin treatment by patients after an MI in Italy, and estimated the effect of in-hospital statin therapy on persistence in treatment during a 2-year follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort observation study of patients who experienced their MI between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2005. Patients to enroll were identified by a diagnosis of MI at discharge from hospital. Previous drug therapies and hospital admissions for cardiovascular reasons in the 12 months before hospitalization for MI, statin treatment and lipid levels during hospitalization, indication for statin treatment at hospital discharge, and adherence to statin treatment in the following 24 months using an integrated analysis of administrative databases and hospital case records were evaluated. Also, factors associated either positively or negatively with consistent acute and long-term use of this efficacy-proven therapy were evaluated. RESULTS: We identified 3,369 patients: 28.5% of patients had not been consistently treated with statins during their hospital stay for MI, and 36.2% of patients did not receive a statin prescription at hospital discharge. Of the 2,629 patients persistent with treatment during the follow-up, only 1,431 had an adherence to statins >80%. Either during the hospitalization or during the follow-up, the use of statins was negatively associated with older age and the presence of diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Lipid levels were significantly higher in treated than in untreated patients, but did not contribute to adherence to treatment. An important factor in long-term adherence to statin treatment was a statin prescription at the time of hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: Since the statin undertreatment rate in routine care is still high, physicians need to increase the awareness of patients regarding the implications of discontinuation and/or underuse of their medications and encourage higher adherence.

Long-term prognosis after primary PCI in unselected patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

AIMS: Long-term prognosis of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) remains relatively poorly investigated in unselected patients. This study analyzed 8-year follow-up of STEMI patients enrolled in the Florence Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry, a population-based, observational study performed in Italy in 2000-2001. METHODS: The prognostic effect of pPCI adjusted for clinical and demographic characteristics on a composite end-point of new myocardial infraction, urgent revascularization or death, and on all-cause mortality separately, was assessed in multivariable Cox analysis, calculating hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. This analysis is concerned with 875 STEMI patients (mean age 70.6 ±â€Š12.9 years), treated with pPCI (459) or conservatively (416). RESULTS: After 8 years, 59% of patients had experienced the composite end-point and 49% had died. The multivariable analysis showed a significantly better prognosis in patients receiving pPCI (hazard ratio 0.72, P = 0.001), evident also in the 645 patients who were event-free after the first year of follow-up (hazard ratio 0.72, P = 0.010). Other independent prognostic factors were advanced age, Killip class greater than 1, some cardiovascular or noncardiovascular comorbidities, in-hospital cardiogenic shock, ejection fraction less than 30%, and treatment with aspirin and statin during hospitalization. The beneficial effect of pPCI observed both in cases younger (adjusted hazard ratio 0.65, P = 0.013) and older than 75 years (adjusted hazard ratio 0.65, P = 0.001) was also confirmed considering as outcome all-cause mortality only. CONCLUSIONS: In unselected STEMI patients, survival advantage from pPCI extends for a long term (8 years). This survival advantage is maintained at advanced ages, thus enforcing the importance of improving delivery of appropriate care to older STEMI patients.

Determinants of treatment strategies and survival in acute myocardial infarction: a population-based study in the Florence district, Italy: results of the acute myocardial infarction Florence registry (AMI-Florence).

AIMS: The Florence Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry is a prospective, observational study aimed at identifying the determinants of use of primary PCI and of prognosis in patients with STE-AMI, in an unselected population-based setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Nine hundred and thirty cases of STE-AMI (mean age: 70.5 years) were prospectively recorded. Factors associated with use of revascularization, or influencing survival were identified through multivariate analyses (respectively: logistic and Cox regression). Primary PCI was the preferred reperfusion therapy in the study district, with 50% of STE-AMI cases admitted within 24h, and 58% of those admitted within 12h from symptom onset treated; about 5% of patients undergone fibrinolysis (overall revascularization being 55% and 63%, respectively). Availability of PCI facilities at admission hospital was the strongest independent positive predictor of subsequent primary PCI. Advanced age, comorbidities, Killip class 3, delayed hospitalisation and other factors independently reduced the probability of receiving reperfusion. In the whole series, in-hospital mortality was 6.6% for revascularization and 15.6% for conservative therapy, 6-month mortality was 10.1% and 26.0% respectively. The independent, protective effect of primary PCI persisted at the multivariate analysis, being 44% the reduction in the risk of death at 6 months. CONCLUSION: In this unselected series of patients, primary PCI, routinely performed in high volume centres, achieved good results in terms of survival even outside the setting of a randomised clinical trial. However, the relatively high number of untreated subjects and the tendency to select less severe cases of AMI for reperfusion treatment confirm the need for an accurate reassessment of behavioural patterns in selecting patients for revascularization.