Relationship between different protein intake recommendations with muscle mass and muscle strength.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to examine the relationship between two different levels of protein intake (0.8 vs.1.2 g/kg body weight/day) with muscle mass and muscle strength. METHOD: Seventy-two postmenopausal women were recruited. Body composition (bioelectrical impedance analysis), muscle strength (dynamometer), energy metabolism (indirect calorimetry) and dietary intake (dietary journal) were measured. We divided the women into two groups. Women with a protein intake of ≥ 1.2 g/kg body weight/day were placed in the Protein ≥ 1.2 group (n = 35), whereas women with a protein intake of 0.8-1.19 g/kg body weight/day were categorized in the Protein 0.8-1.19 group (n = 32). RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between groups for age, height, skeletal muscle mass, resting energy expenditure, total energy expenditure, carbohydrate and lipid intake. Significant differences between groups were observed for body mass index (p < 0.001), fat mass (p < 0.001) and muscle strength (hand grip and knee extensors) (p < 0.001). More specifically, the Protein ≥ 1.2 group presented a higher muscle strength as well as a lower body mass index and fat mass compared to the Protein 0.8-1.19 group. In addition, the group with a protein intake of ≥ 1.2 g/kg body weight/day presented significantly higher energy intake (p = 0.002), and essential (p < 0.001) and non-essential (p < 0.001) amino acid intake. Interestingly, when muscle strength was adjusted for essential or non-essential amino acids, differences in muscle strength persisted. CONCLUSION: The present study indicates higher levels of muscle strength in postmenopausal women with a protein intake of ≥ 1.2 g/kg body weight/day compared to 0.8-1.19 g/kg body weight/day despite no differences in muscle mass.

Relationship between protein intake and dynapenia in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between protein intake and dynapenia. DESIGN: A cross-sectional/observational study. SETTING: Department of Kinanthropology at the University of Quebec at Montreal. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-two non-frail postmenopausal women aged between 50 to 75 years were recruited. MEASUREMENTS: Body weight (BW), lean body mass (LBM; %) and skeletal muscle mass (bio-electrical impedancemetry analysis), maximum voluntary handgrip strength (using hand dynamometer), aerobic capacity (VO2peak) and dietary intake were measured. Women were divided according to dynapenia criteria. RESULTS: The strongest correlation between muscle strength and protein intake was observed when we express the amount of protein in g/d/BW. No differences for age, BMI, status of menopause, fat mass and VO2peak were observed between non-dynapenic, type I dynapenic and type II dynapenic women, independently of the criteria used. We observed significant differences in protein intake (g/d/BW) between non-dynapenic and type II dynapenic (p<0.01) as well as between type I dynapenic and type II dynapenic (p<0.01) when dynapenia was expressed in kg/BW and in kg/LBM, respectively. It should be noted that no differences in LBM between the three groups were observed when dynapenia was expressed in kg/BW and kg/LBM. Protein intake for all groups respected the RDA of 0.8 to 1.2 g/d/BW (non-dynapenic: 1.44/1.38; type I dynapenic: 1.30/1.33; type II dynapenic: 1.05/1.08 g/d/BW). CONCLUSIONS: Protein intake seems to play a role in the development of dynapenia particularly at the level of type II dynapenia. Therefore, an increase in the recommended daily allowance for protein intake may be warranted.