Treating opioid dependence with extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) in Ukraine: Feasibility and three-month outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Although opioid agonist treatments (OAT) with methadone or buprenorphine are available to treat opioid use disorders (OUD) in Ukraine, OAT acceptability and coverage remains low. Extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) that recently became available as another treatment option provides new opportunities for treating OUDs in this region and we aimed to test its feasibility. METHODS: Patients with OUD (N=135) and interested in treatment with XR-NTX were initiated on monthly XR-NTX injections and monitored for three months. Correlates of 3-month retention on XR-NTX and drug use at each time-point using self-reports and urine drug testing (UDT) were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 134 participants initiated XR-NTX, 101 (75%) completed three months, defined as 4 consecutive XR-NTX injections. Independent factors negatively associated with retention in XR-NTX treatment included previous maintenance with OAT (aOR=0.3; 95%CI=0.1-0.9) and extrinsic help-seeking treatment motivation (aOR=0.7; 95%CI=0.5-0.9). Of these 101 participants completing three months of treatment, opioid use markedly reduced using self-report (67%% to 22%; p>0.001) and UDT (77% to 24%; p<0.001) outcomes over time. Alcohol, marijuana and stimulant use, however, remained unchanged. Craving for opioids and symptoms of depression also significantly decreased, while health-related quality of life scores improved over time. No adverse side effects were reported during the period of observation. CONCLUSION: The first introduction of XR-NTX in Ukraine among persons with OUD resulted in high levels of retention, marked reductions in opioid use and improved quality of life. These descriptive results suggest that XR-NTX treatment is feasible and well-tolerated over a 3-month period in Ukraine.

Concurrent drug injection during opioid agonist treatment among people who inject drugs in Ukraine.

Ongoing drug use during opioid agonist treatment (OAT) negatively affects treatment and health outcomes, and increases treatment dropout. This study aimed to examine correlates of concurrent illicit drug use among OAT patients in Ukraine. A random sample of 434 patients currently on OAT receiving buprenorphine (BMT) or methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) from five cities in Ukraine were assessed for factors associated with self-reported concurrent illicit drug use during OAT using a multivariable logistic regression. Among 434 OAT patients, 100 (23%) reported concurrent drug injecting in the previous 30 days; 28% of these were injecting ≥20 days. While 100 (100%) of these injected opioids, 24 (24%) injected stimulants; 40 (40%) met criteria for polysubstance use disorder that included opioids, stimulants and alcohol. Independent correlates of concurrent drug injection included: being on MMT vs. BMT (aOR = 2.8, 95%CI = 1.4-5.8), lower OAT dosage (aOR = 1.7, 95%CI = 1.1-2.7), more severe addiction severity (aOR = 2.3, 95%CI = 1.4-3.8), younger age of injection initiation (aOR = 2.3, 95%CI = 1.3-3.9), and presence of alcohol use disorder (aOR = 2.1, 95%CI = 1.3-3.5); participants living with parents were negatively associated with concurrent drug injection. Concurrent drug use was prevalent among OAT patients in Ukraine indicating the urgent needs for tailored interventions and changes in OAT program design and implementation. Results highlight the importance of prescribing an adequate OAT dosage, and discrepancies between MMT and BMT programs in Ukraine addressing needs of OAT patients with specific characteristics such as severe opioid and alcohol dependence.

Willingness to pay for opioid agonist treatment among opioid dependent people who inject drugs in Ukraine.

BACKGROUND: In the context of decreasing external and limited Ukrainian governmental funding for opioid agonist treatments (OAT) for opioid dependent people who inject drugs in Ukraine, information on sustainable financial models is needed. METHODS: Data on 855 opioid dependent people who inject drugs (PWID) were drawn from a cross-sectional nationwide survey of 1613 PWID. They comprised 434 participants who were receiving OAT and 421 who were on OAT in the past or have never been on OAT and were interested in receiving the treatment. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with willingness-to-pay (WTP) for OAT, stratified by OAT experience. Variation in the price which respondents were willing to pay for OAT and its effect on their monthly income among PWID with different OAT experience were assessed as a continuous variable using one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: Overall, 378 (44%) expressed WTP for OAT. Factors independently associated with WTP differed by OAT experience. Among those using OAT, independent predictors of WTP included: city (Dnipro - aOR=1.9; 95%CI=1.1-4.8 and Lviv - (aOR=2.2; 95%CI=1.1-4.8) compared to those elsewhere in Ukraine), higher income (aOR=1.8; 95%CI=1.2-2.7) and receiving psychosocial counseling (aOR=1.8; 95%CI=1.2-2.7). Among those who had previously been on OAT, positive attitude towards OAT (aOR=1.3; 95%CI=1.1-1.6) and family support of OAT (aOR=2.5; 95%CI=1.1-5.7) were independently associated with WTP. Among PWID who had never been on OAT, being male (aOR=2.2; 95%CI=1.1-4.2), younger age (aOR=1.9; 95%CI=1.2-3.2), higher income (aOR=2.0; 95%CI=1.2-3.4) and previous unsuccessful attempts to enter OAT (aOR=2.3; 95%CI=1.1-4.7) were independently associated with WTP. PWID were willing to commit a large percentage of their monthly income for OAT, which, however, varied significantly based on OAT experience: current OAT: 37% of monthly income, previous OAT: 53%, and never OAT: 60% (p-value=0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: WTP for OAT was substantial among PWID in Ukraine, supporting the implementation of self-pay or co-payment programs. Such strategies, however, must remain affordable, provide better access to OAT, and consider specific needs of PWID.