Hepatitis B Vaccination in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: A Quality Improvement Project at a Veteran Affairs Chronic Kidney Disease Clinic.

Hepatitis B vaccination is recommended in all patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). However, only 50-60% of these patients achieve protective antibody levels if immunized after starting dialysis. Strategies to overcome this low seroconversion rate include a 6-month vaccination schedule starting earlier [chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 4 and 5] to ensure immunity when patients progress to ESKD. We conducted a quality improvement program to immunize pre-dialysis patients. Patients who were found to have a negative baseline serology with a negative hepatitis B surface antibody level (HBsAb) were offered vaccination on a 6-month schedule (0, 1 and 6 months) with one of two available vaccines within the VA system (Recombivax™ or Engerix™). HBsAb titers were checked 3-4 months later, and titers ≥ 12 mIU/mL were indicative of immunity at VA. Patients who did not seroconvert were offered a repeat schedule of three more doses. We screened 198 patients (187 males and 11 females) with CKD 4 and 5 [glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 29 mL/min/1.73 m2]. The median age of this cohort was 72 years (range 38-92 years). During the study period of 5 years (2015-2020), 10 patients were excluded since their GFR had improved to more than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, 24 others had baseline immunity and 2 refused vaccination. The hepatitis B vaccination series was not started on 106 patients. Of the remaining 56, 12 patients progressed to ESKD and started dialysis before completion of the vaccination schedule, 6 expired and 1 did not come to clinic in 2020 due to the pandemic. Of the 37 patients who completed the vaccination schedule, 16 achieved seroconversion with adequate HBsAb titers, 10 did not develop immunity despite a second hepatitis B vaccination series, while 11 did not get a second series. Given the low seroconversion rate, albeit in a small cohort, vaccination should be considered in patients with earlier stages of CKD. Other options include studies on FDA approved vaccines of shorter duration. We plan to increase awareness among nephrologists, patients and nursing staff about the importance of achieving immunity against hepatitis B.

Recognition and Management of Resistant Hypertension.

Despite improvements in hypertension awareness and treatment, 30%-60% of hypertensive patients do not achieve BP targets and subsequently remain at risk for target organ damage. This therapeutic gap is particularly important to nephrologists, who frequently encounter treatment-resistant hypertension in patients with CKD. Data are limited on how best to treat patients with CKD and resistant hypertension, because patients with CKD have historically been excluded from hypertension treatment trials. First, we propose a consistent definition of resistant hypertension as BP levels confirmed by both in-office and out-of-office measurements that exceed appropriate targets while the patient is receiving treatment with at least three antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic, at dosages optimized to provide maximum benefit in the absence of intolerable side effects. Second, we recommend that each patient undergo a standardized, stepwise evaluation to assess adherence to dietary and lifestyle modifications and antihypertensive medications to identify and reduce barriers and discontinue use of substances that may exacerbate hypertension. Patients in whom there is high clinical suspicion should be evaluated for potential secondary causes of hypertension. Evidence-based management of resistant hypertension is discussed with special considerations of the differences in approach to patients with and without CKD, including the specific roles of diuretics and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and the current place of emerging therapies, such as renal denervation and baroreceptor stimulation. We endorse use of such a systematic approach to improve recognition and care for this vulnerable patient group that is at high risk for future kidney and cardiovascular events.

Endovascular treatment of arteriovenous graft pseudoaneurysms, indications, complications, and outcomes: a systematic review.

There are limited data regarding endovascular treatment of arteriovenous graft (AVG) pseudoaneurysms using stent grafts. We performed a comprehensive literature review on the use of stent grafts in the treatment of AVG pseudoaneurysms. We included 10 studies (121 patients). The mean AVG age was 3.1 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2-4) and pseudoaneurysm mean diameter was 34 mm (95% CI: 23-46). The majority (71%) of the pseudoaneurysms were located on the arterial limb of the AVG and 77% presented with venous anastomosis stenosis requiring angioplasty. The mean number of stents used to treat one lesion was 1.4 (95% CI: 1.3-1.5). The technical success rate of pseudoaneurysm isolation was 100% in all studies and 100% of patients received hemodialysis using the AVG after pseudoaneurysm treatment without the need for catheter placement. The primary patency rates for 1, 3, and 6 months were 81%, 73%, and 24%. Secondary patency was 80%, 77%, and 74% at 1, 3, and 6 months. Arteriovenous graft thrombosis occurred in 12% of patients. Arteriovenous graft infection developed in 35% of cases. Arteriovenous graft pseudoaneurysm treatment using stent grafts is effective in managing even large pseudoaneurysms and has acceptable primary and secondary patency rates. Graft infection was a relatively frequent complication.

How I do it: endovascular treatment of arteriovenous graft pseudoaneurysms-watch out for the mouth.

We present a case of arteriovenous graft pseudoaneurysms treated endovascularly with stent grafts and make suggestions regarding the technique of evaluating the pseudoaneurysms and choosing the proper location to deploy the stent grafts to maximize the outcomes and minimize the length of the graft covered by the stent. We also comment on the selection of lesions that are suitable to be treated with this technique.

Nocturnal home hemodialysis for a patient with type 1 hyperoxaluria.

Type 1 primary hyperoxaluria is a genetic disorder caused by deficiency of the liver-specific peroxisomal enzyme alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase. This enzyme deficiency leads to excess oxalate production and deposition of calcium oxalate salts, resulting in kidney failure and systemic oxalosis. Aside from combined liver/kidney transplantation, no curative treatment exists. Various strategies for optimizing dialysis treatment have been evaluated, but neither conventional hemodialysis nor peritoneal dialysis can keep pace with oxalate production in this patient population. In this report, we describe a patient with end-stage renal disease from type 1 primary hyperoxaluria managed with nocturnal home hemodialysis. Performing hemodialysis 8-10 hours each night with blood flow of 350 mL/min and total dialysate volume of 60 L, she has maintained pre- and postdialysis serum oxalate levels at or below the level of supersaturation. We also review published literature regarding oxalate removal in various modalities of dialysis in patients with type 1 primary hyperoxaluria. In our patient, nocturnal hemodialysis has controlled serum oxalate levels better than conventional hemodialysis therapies. Home nocturnal hemodialysis should be considered an option for management of patients with end-stage renal disease from type 1 hyperoxaluria who are awaiting transplantation.

Type B lactic acidosis associated with multiple myeloma.

We present a 58-year-old man with recurrent multiple myeloma treated with 2 autologous stem cell transplantations. He was admitted for dyspnea and found to have severe type B lactic acidosis with serum lactate level of 193.6 mg/dL. This case reviews malignancy-associated type B lactic acidosis and discusses its etiology, pathogenesis, and management.