1.
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol
; 67(4): 503-9, 2001 Oct.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-11779064
2.
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol
; 58(1): 1-7, 1997 Jan.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-8952918
Subject(s)
Aluminum/analysis , Cooking and Eating Utensils , Food Analysis , Fruit/chemistry , Health , Humans , Tea/chemistry , Time Factors
3.
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol
; 57(6): 888-94, 1996 Dec.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-8875835
4.
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol
; 33(1): 121-6, 1984 Jul.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-6466884
5.
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol
; 28(1): 58-60, 1982 Jan.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-6802206
6.
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol
; 24(1): 142-4, 1980 Jan.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-6766758
7.
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol
; 8(2): 201-12, 1979.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-120139
ABSTRACT
This study describes the extent of DDT contamination in a typical fruit growing district in Norway two and four years after the DDT ban. Residues of DDT in man, dairy cows and soil were about five to one hundred times higher than in the control groups, while residues found in samples from the marine biota were the same or moderately higher (Figure 3). The residues of DDT in cows, gulls and parts of the marine samples showed a significant decrease from 1972 to 1974, while the level in soil was almost constant. The amount of DDE had increased considerably in 1974 for all the species except for the gull, although not to the same degree. The distribution of DDE, DDD and DDT in soil were almost constant during the two years of sampling.