Pentoxifylline (PTX)--an alternative treatment in Graves' ophthalmopathy (inactive phase): assessment by a disease specific quality of life questionnaire and by exophthalmometry in a prospective randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of pentoxifylline (PTX) in subjects with inactive Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO) through a specific quality of life (QOL) questionnaire and exophthalmometry readings. METHODS: Eighteen females were randomly divided in two groups. Group A (n=9) was treated with PTX 1200 mg orally/day for 6 months. Group B (n=9) received placebo during the initial 6 months and then PTX for another 6 months. Proptosis measurements were carried out every 3 months and a questionnaire graded from 0 to 10 according to the severity of the symptoms was performed at baseline and after placebo and PTX administration. RESULTS: At baseline, Group A questionnaire score values were 5.5 (median; range 3.5 to 8.0), and 5.0 after 6 months (3.0 to 6.0; p=0.01). In Group B, baseline values were not significantly different after 6 months of placebo: 6.0 (4.5 to 7.0) and 5.5 (4.5 to 7.0), respectively. However, a significant change was observed 6 months after PTX: 4.0 (2.0 to 5.0; p<0.001). Patients in Group A had a progressive improvement of proptosis during PTX: at baseline, 23 mm (median; range 20 to 32); after 3 months, 23 mm (18 to 30; p=0.02); and after 6 months, 23 mm (18 to 30; p=0.005). In Group B, proptosis remained stable during placebo: at baseline, 23 mm (21 to 25); after 3 months, 23 mm (20 to 25); and after 6 months, 23.5 mm (20 to 25). A significant change was observed after 3 and 6 months of PTX: 22 mm (19 to 24; p=0.0006) and 20.8 mm (17 to 25; p=0.0003), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pentoxifylline seems to improve the QOL of patients in the inactive phase of GO. The objective findings of the proptosis readings corroborate to suggest that PTX may be an effective and promising drug in the inactive phase of GO.

Pentoxifylline (PTX): an alternative treatment in Graves ophthalmopathy (inactive phase): assessment by a disease specific quality of life questionnaire and by exophthalmometry in a prospective randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of pentoxifylline (PTX) in subjects with inactive Graves ophthalmopathy (GO) through a specific quality of life (QOL) questionnaire and exophthalmometry readings. METHODS: Eighteen females were randomly divided in two groups. Group A (n=9) was treated with PTX 1200 mg orally/day for 6 months. Group B (n=9) received placebo during the initial 6 months and then PTX for another 6 months. Proptosis measurements were carried out every 3 months and a questionnaire graded from 0 to 10 according to the severity of the symptoms was performed at baseline and after placebo and PTX administration. RESULTS: At baseline, Group A questionnaire score values were 5.5 (median; range 3.5 to 8.0), and 5.0 after 6 months (3.0 to 6.0; p=0.01). In Group B, baseline values were not significantly different after 6 months of placebo: 6.0 (4.5 to 7.0) and 5.5 (4.5 to 7.0), respectively. However, a significant change was observed 6 months after PTX: 4.0 (2.0 to 5.0; p<0.001). Patients in Group A had a progressive improvement of proptosis during PTX: at baseline, 23 mm (median; range 20 to 32); after 3 months, 23 mm (18 to 30; p=0.02); and after 6 months, 23 mm (18 to 30; p=0.005). In Group B, proptosis remained stable during placebo: at baseline, 23 mm (21 to 25); after 3 months, 23 mm (20 to 25); and after 6 months, 23.5 mm (20 to 25). A significant change was observed after 3 and 6 months of PTX: 22 mm (19 to 24; p=0.0006) and 20.8 mm (17 to 25; p=0.0003), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pentoxifylline seems to improve the QOL of patients in the inactive phase of GO. The objective findings of the proptosis readings corroborate to suggest that PTX may be an effective and promising drug in the inactive phase of GO. (Eur J Ophthalmol 2004; 14: 277-83).

Dexamethasone does not increase IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in man in the absence of endogenous GH.

It has been previously shown that short-term glucocorticoid administration increases circulating IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels both in men and rats. An increase in endogenous GH secretion or a direct hepatic effect have been suggested as possible mechanisms. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of short-term dexamethasone administration (3 mg orally during 7 days) in 8 patients with Sheehan's syndrome in replacement therapy. All patients had GH values <2.5 pg/l after clonidine administration. Before treatment IGF-I values were 9.3 3.6 microg/l (mean +/- SE) and IGFBP-3 levels were 1,195 +/- 208 microg/l. After dexamethasone administration there were no significant changes either in IGF-I or IGFBP-3 values (10.7 +/- 4.1 and 1,110 +/- 214 microg/l, respectively). A significant increase in insulin values was observed after dexamethasone administration (before: 120 +/- 10 micromol/l; after: 175 +/- 27 pmol/l; p<0.05), while glucose levels did not reach statistical significance (before: 4.6 +/- 0.3 mmol/l; after: 5.9 +/- 1.0 mmol/l). Our data suggest that dexamethasone is unable to increase circulating IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in man in the absence of endogenous GH.

Acute dexamethasone administration enhances GH responsiveness to GH releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6) in man.

OBJECTIVE: Acute administration of glucocorticoids stimulates GH secretion probably by a decrease in hypothalamic somatostatin release. GHRP-6 is a synthetic hexapeptide that increases GH secretion by a mechanism of action not yet fully known, but apparently not by inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of acute dexamethasone administration on GH responsiveness to GHRP-6 in man. DESIGN: One group of subjects received iv GHRP-6 (1 microg/kg), GH-releasing hormone (GHRH; 100 microg), GHRH plus GHRP-6 or saline 3.5 h after oral acute dexamethasone administration (4 mg; at 0600 h). A second study group was treated with GHRP-6, GHRH or GHRP-6 plus GHRH after placebo ingestion, following the same protocol. PATIENTS: Sixteen normal subjects (mean age: 29 +/- 3.3 years), with normal BMI (22.4 +/- 2.0 kg/m2), were studied. Eight subjects received dexamethasone and the other eight were treated with placebo. MEASUREMENTS: Serum GH was measured by a two site monoclonal antibody immunofluorometric assay. RESULTS: In the placebo-treated subjects, mean peak GH (mU/l; mean +/- SE) and AUC (mU.min/l) values after GHRP-6 administration (peak: 43.8 +/- 9.0; AUC: 2262.0 +/- 459. 2) did not differ from those observed after GHRH injection (peak: 49. 8 +/- 12.0; AUC: 2903.4 +/- 872.6). The association of the two peptides markedly increased GH levels (peak: 172.4 +/- 34.2; AUC: 10393.0 +/- 1894.8) compared with the isolated administration of GHRP-6 or GHRH. In the subjects who received dexamethasone 3.5 h before saline injection, GH baseline values were significantly higher than those observed after 90 min of sampling (12.4 +/- 9.4 vs. 4.6 +/- 2.0). Mean GH peak and AUC values after GHRP-6 (peak: 78.8 +/- 11.0; AUC: 4114.6 +/- 588.2) and after GHRH administration (peak: 46.8 +/- 16.0; AUC: 3006.8 +/- 1010.0) did not differ significantly in the dexamethasone-treated subjects. In this study group, the administration of the two peptides together caused a significant increase in both peak (119.2 +/- 16.0) and AUC values (7377.0 +/- 937.2) compared with the response obtained after each peptide alone. When the two groups were compared, a significant increase in GH responsiveness to GHRP-6 was observed after dexamethasone administration compared with placebo. No differences in GH response to GHRH, or to the administration of the two peptides together, were seen between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Oral dexamethasone, at a dose of 4 mg, enhances GH releasing peptide-6-induced GH release when administered 3.5 h earlier. These results suggest that dexamethasone and GHRP-6 could act at different sites of GH releasing mechanisms. Further studies are necessary to elucidate these findings.