Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
N Engl J Med ; 336(21): 1473-9, 1997 May 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9154765

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A growing body of evidence suggests that electromagnetic interference may occur between cardiac pacemakers and wireless hand-held (cellular) telephones, posing a potential public health problem. Electromagnetic interference may occur when the pacemaker is exposed to an electromagnetic field generated by the cellular telephone. METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective, crossover study, we tested 980 patients with cardiac pacemakers with five types of telephones (one analogue and four digital) to assess the potential for interference. Telephones were tested in a test mode and were programmed to transmit at the maximal power, simulating the worst-case scenario; in addition, one telephone was tested during actual transmission to simulate actual use. Patients were electrocardiographically monitored while the telephones were tested at the ipsilateral ear and in a series of maneuvers directly over the pacemaker. Interference was classified according to the type and clinical significance of the effect. RESULTS: The incidence of any type of interference was 20 percent in the 5533 tests, and the incidence of symptoms was 7.2 percent. The incidence of clinically significant interference was 6.6 percent. There was no clinically significant interference when the telephone was placed in the normal position over the ear. Interference that was definitely clinically significant occurred in only 1.7 percent of tests, and only when the telephone was held over the pacemaker. Interference was more frequent with dual-chamber pacemakers (25.3 percent) than with single-chamber pacemakers (6.8 percent, P<0.001) and more frequent with pacemakers without feed-through filters (28.9 to 55.8 percent) than with those with such filters (0.4 to 0.8 percent, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Cellular telephones can interfere with the function of implanted cardiac pacemakers. However, when telephones are placed over the ear, the normal position, this interference does not pose a health risk.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/etiology , Electromagnetic Fields/adverse effects , Pacemaker, Artificial , Telephone , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Over Studies , Dizziness/etiology , Electrocardiography , Equipment Failure , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
2.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 19(10): 1419-30, 1996 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8904532

ABSTRACT

The use of wireless communication devices has increased rapidly, with current industry estimates of 50,000,000 subscribers of cellular telephone services, a number that is expected to double by the year 2000. Because wireless communication devices emit RF signals, they have the potential to interfere with implantable devices. The mechanism of interference and the magnitude of interference must be considered in terms of the type of wireless communication device being used and the characteristics of the individual implantable device that is exposed to the RF emission of the cellular phone. This article reviews the potential effects of wireless communication devices on implantable devices and makes initial recommendations for patients with implantable devices.


Subject(s)
Defibrillators, Implantable , Electromagnetic Fields/adverse effects , Pacemaker, Artificial , Telephone , Equipment Failure , Humans , Radio Waves/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...