Racial disparities in telehealth use during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on initial infertility consultations. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Fertility practice in an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Patients presenting for initial infertility consultation between January 2019 and June 2021 were randomly selected for prepandemic (n = 500) and pandemic (n = 500) cohorts. EXPOSURE: Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was a change in the proportion of African American patients using telehealth after pandemic onset compared with all other patients. Secondary outcomes included presentation to an appointment vs. no-show or cancellation. Exploratory outcomes included appointment length and in vitro fertilization initiation. RESULTS: The prepandemic cohort vs. the pandemic cohort had fewer patients with commercial insurance (64.4% vs. 72.80%) and more African American patients (33.0% vs. 27.0%), although the racial makeup did not differ significantly between the two cohorts. Rates of missed appointments did not differ between the cohorts, but the prepandemic cohort vs. the pandemic cohort was more likely to no-show (49.4% vs. 27.8%) and less likely to cancel (50.6% vs. 72.2%). African American patients, compared with all other patients, during the pandemic were less likely to use telehealth (57.0% vs. 66.8%). African American patients, compared with all other patients, were less likely to have commercial insurance (prepandemic: 41.2% vs. 75.8%; pandemic: 57.0% vs. 78.6%), present to their scheduled appointment (prepandemic: 52.7% vs. 73.7%; pandemic: 48.1% vs. 74.8%), and cancel vs. no-show (prepandemic: 30.8% vs. 68.2%, pandemic: 64.3% vs. 78.3%). On multivariable analysis, African American patients were less likely (odds ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.50) and telehealth users were more likely (odds ratio 1.54, 95% confidence interval 1.04-2.27) to present to their appointments vs. no-show or cancel when controlling for insurance type and timing relative to the onset of the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Telehealth implementation during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic decreased the overall no-show rate, but this shift did not apply to African American patients. This analysis highlights disparities in insurance coverage, telehealth utilization, and presentation for an initial consultation in the African American population during the pandemic.

Fertility and Sterility top videos from 2021.

OBJECTIVE: To objectively grade all video publications in Fertility and Sterility during the year 2021 and compile a list of the top 10 surgical videos. DESIGN: A descriptive presentation of the 10 highest-scoring video publications from Fertility and Sterility in the year 2021. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT/ANIMALS: Not applicable. INTERVENTIONS: J.F., Z.K., J.P.P., and S.R.L. acted as independent reviewers of all video publications. A standardized scoring method was used to score all videos. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Up to 5 points were awarded for each of the following categories: scientific merit or clinical relevance of the topic; clarity of the video; use of an innovative surgical technique; and video editing or the use of marking tools on the video to highlight important features or surgical landmarks. This allowed a maximum score of 20 for each video. The number of YouTube views and likes was used as a tiebreaker if ≥2 videos scored similarly. The interclass coefficient from a 2-way random effects model was calculated to assess the agreement among the 4 independent reviewers. RESULT(S): A total of 36 videos were published in Fertility and Sterility during the year 2021. After averaging scores from all 4 reviewers, a top-10 list was created. The overall interclass correlation coefficient for the 4 reviews was 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.89-0.94). CONCLUSION(S): An overall substantial agreement was noted among the 4 reviewers. A total of 10 videos reigned supreme from a list of very competitive publications that had already undergone the peer review process. The subject matter of these videos ranged from complex surgical procedures, including uterine transplantation, to common procedures, such as GYN ultrasound.

Fertility and Sterility top videos of 2020.

OBJECTIVE: To objectively grade all video publications in Fertility and Sterility during 2020 and compile a list of the top 5 surgical videos. DESIGN: Descriptive presentation of the 5 highest scoring video publications from Fertility and Sterility in 2020 SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S)/ANIMAL(S): Not applicable. INTERVENTION(S): J.F., Z.K., J.P.P., and S.R.L. acted as independent reviewers of all video publications. A standardized scoring method was used to score all videos. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Up to 5 points were awarded for each of the following categories: scientific merit or clinical relevance of the topic, the clarity of the video, the use of innovative surgical technique, and video editing or the use of marking tools on the video to highlight the important features or surgical landmarks. This allowed a maximum score of 20 for each video. The numbers of YouTube views and likes were used as a tiebreaker if ≥2 videos scored similarly. The interclass coefficient from a 2-way random-effects model was calculated to assess for agreement between the 4 independent reviewers. RESULT(S): A total of 20 videos were published in Fertility and Sterility during 2020. After averaging scores from all 4 reviewers, a list of top 5 videos was created (Table 1). The overall interclass coefficient for the 4 reviews was 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.89). CONCLUSION(S): An overall substantial agreement was noted among the 4 reviewers. Five videos particularly stood out within the competitive peer reviewed publications. The subject matter of these videos ranged from complex surgical procedures, including transvaginal natural orifice surgery and advanced endometriosis to basic embryology laboratory topics that covered trophectoderm biopsy and novel intracytoplasmic sperm injection techniques.

Uterine Transplantation: Recipient Patient Populations.

Uterine transplantation is an emerging treatment for patients with uterine factor infertility (UFI). In order to determine patient candidacy for transplant, it is imperative to understand how to identify, counsel and treat uterine transplant recipients. In this article, we focus on patient populations with UFI, whether congenital or acquired, including Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser, complete androgen insensitivity syndrome, hysterectomy, and other causes of nonabsolute UFI. Complete preoperative screening of recipients should be required to assess the candidacy of each individual prior to undergoing this extensive treatment option.

Fertility and Sterility top videos from 2017 to 2019.

OBJECTIVE: To objectively grade all video publications in Fertility and Sterility during the years 2017-2019 and compile a list of the top 10 surgical videos. DESIGN: Descriptive presentation of the 10 highest-scoring video publications from Fertility and Sterility in the years 2017-2019. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S)/ANIMAL(S): Not applicable. INTERVENTION(S): All 4 authors acted as independent reviewers of all video publications. A standardized scoring method was used to score all videos. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Up to 5 points were awarded for each of the following categories: Scientific merit or clinical relevance of the topic; clarity of video; use of innovative surgical technique; and video editing or use of marking tools on the video to highlight important features or surgical landmarks. This allowed a maximum score of 20 for each video. The number of YouTube views and likes were used as a tiebreaker if ≥2 videos scored similarly. The interclass coefficient from a 2-way random effects model was calculated to assess for agreement between the 4 independent reviewers. RESULT(S): A total of 40 videos were published in Fertility and Sterility during the years 2017-2019. After averaging scores from all 4 reviewers, a top 10 list was created (Table). Only 2 videos (number 6 and 7 spots) had the same average score, and the number of YouTube views and likes were used as a tiebreaker. The overall interclass coefficient for the 4 reviewers was 0.68 (95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.76). CONCLUSION(S): An overall substantial agreement was noted between the 4 reviewers. Ten videos reigned supreme from a list of very competitive publications that had already undergone the peer review process. The subject matter of these videos ranged from complex surgical procedures, including uterus transplantation and use of a biologic graft for neovaginoplasty, to common procedures like hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine devices during pregnancy and approaches to the stenotic cervix.

Excision versus Ablation for Management of Minimal to Mild Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to perform an updated analysis of the literature in regard to the surgical management of minimal to mild endometriosis. This study evaluated women of reproductive age with superficial endometriosis to determine if the results of surgical excision compared with those of ablation in improved pain scores postoperatively. DATA SOURCES: The following databases were searched from inception to May 2020 for relevant studies: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (MEDLINE), Ovid (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Web of Science. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: From our literature search, a total of 2633 articles were identified and screened. Ultimately, 4 randomized controlled trials were selected and included in our systematic review. The combined total number of subjects was 346 from these 4 studies, with sample sizes ranging from 24 to 170 participants. Data from 3 of the included studies were able to be compared and analyzed for a meta-analysis. The primary outcome was reduction in the visual analog scale (VAS) score for endometriosis-associated pain (dysmenorrhea, dyschezia, and dyspareunia), with follow-up time ranging from 6 to 60 months postoperatively. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Data extracted from each study included the mean reduction in the VAS score from baseline. A random-effects model was used owing to significant heterogeneity across the studies. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3 software (Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom). The meta-analyses showed no significant differences between the excision and ablation groups in the mean reduction in VAS scores from baseline to 12 months postoperatively for dysmenorrhea (mean difference [MD] -0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.27 to 1.22; p = .97), dyschezia (MD 0.46; 95% CI, -1.09 to 2.02; p = .56), and dyspareunia (MD 0.10; 95% CI, -2.36 to 2.56; p = .94). In addition, there were no significant differences between the excision and ablation groups in mean VAS scores at the 12-month follow-up and beyond for dysmenorrhea (MD -0.11; 95% CI, -2.14 to 1.93; p = .92), dyschezia (MD 0.01; 95% CI, -0.70 to 0.72; p = .99), and dyspareunia (MD 0.34; 95% CI, -1.61 to 2.30; p = .73). CONCLUSION: On the basis of the data from our systematic review and pooled meta-analysis, no significant difference between laparoscopic excision and ablation was noted in regard to improving pain from minimal to mild endometriosis. However, to make definitive conclusions on this topic, larger randomized controlled trials are needed with longer follow-up.

Transvaginal cervical length and tobacco use in Appalachian women: association with increased risk for spontaneous preterm birth.

Currently ACOG recommends that a mid-term screening strategy may be considered to identify short cervix in low risk populations in an effort to prevent preterm birth. Vaginal progesterone is recommended for women with a cervical length ≤20 mm. Cerclage is recommended for women with prior spontaneous preterm birth who are already receiving progesterone supplementition and CL is <25 mm. This study examined risk factors for spontaneous preterm birth (SPB) <35 weeks among a general obstetrical population prior to these ACOG recommendations. However, cervical cerclage was a possible intervention. Study population included 1,074 patients from 1 Jan 2007-30 Jun 2008 receiving mid-trimester transvaginal ultrasounds during prenatal care at a tertiary medical center clinic. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve cutoff optimal value was ≤34 mm, (n=224), corresponding to 8.9% SPB with shortened cervices compared to 1.4% in patients with normal cervices (>34 mm; n=850; p<0.001 (Area Under the Curve (AUC) 76.6, p<0.001). Cervical lengths <30 mm had 12 times the risk of SPB (p<0.001) while 30-34 mm had 5 times (p=0.005). Tobacco use (≥10 cigarettes per day), p=0.030, and low BMI, p=0.034, had additive effect. Shortened cervical length during routine screening independently predicted SPB while heavy smoking with shortened cervix during pregnancy doubled risk compared to shortened cervix alone.

Smoking in pregnancy in West Virginia: does cessation/reduction improve perinatal outcomes?

To determine if pregnant women decreasing/quitting tobacco use will have improved fetal outcomes. Retrospective analysis of pregnant smokers from 6/1/2006-12/31/2007 who received prenatal care and delivered at a tertiary medical care center in West Virginia. Variables analyzed included birth certificate data linked to intervention program survey data. Patients were divided into four study groups: <8 cigarettes/day-no reduction, <8 cigarettes/day-reduction, ≥8 cigarettes/day-no reduction, and ≥8 cigarettes/day-reduction. Analysis performed using ANOVA one-way test for continuous variables and Chi-square for categorical variables. Inclusion criteria met by 250 patients. Twelve women (4.8%) quit smoking; 150 (60%) reduced; 27 (10.8%) increased; and 61 (24.4%) had no change. Comparing the four study groups for pre-term births (<37 weeks), 25% percent occurred in ≥8 no reduction group while 10% occurred in ≥8 with reduction group (P = 0.026). The high rate of preterm birth (25%) in the non-reducing group depended on 2 factors: (1) ≥8 cigarettes/day at beginning and (2) no reduction by the end of prenatal care. Finally, there was a statistically significant difference in birth weights between the two groups: ≥8 cigarettes/day with no reduction (2,872.6 g) versus <8 cigarettes/day with reduction (3,212.4 g) (P = 0.028). Smoking reduction/cessation lowered risk of pre-term delivery (<37 weeks) twofold. Encouraging patients who smoke ≥8 cigarettes/day during pregnancy to decrease/quit prior to delivery provides significant clinical benefit by decreasing the likelihood of preterm birth. These findings support tobacco cessation efforts as a means to improve birth outcome.