IVF outcomes in patients with a history of bariatric surgery: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

STUDY QUESTION: How does a history of dramatic weight loss linked to bariatric surgery impact IVF outcomes? SUMMARY ANSWER: Women with a history of bariatric surgery who had undergone IVF had a comparable cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) to non-operated patients of the same BMI after the first IVF cycle. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In the current context of increasing prevalence of obesity in women of reproductive age, weight loss induced by bariatric surgery has been shown to improve spontaneous fertility in obese women. However, little is known on the clinical benefit of bariatric surgery in obese infertile women undergoing IVF. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This exploratory retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted in 10 287 IVF/ICSI cycles performed between 2012 and 2016. We compared the outcome of the first IVF cycle in women with a history of bariatric surgery to two age-matched groups composed of non-operated women matched on the post-operative BMI of cases, and non-operated severely obese women. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The three exposure groups of age-matched women undergoing their first IVF cycle were compared: Group 1: 83 women with a history of bariatric surgery (exposure, mean BMI 28.9 kg/m2); Group 2: 166 non-operated women (non-exposed to bariatric surgery, mean BMI = 28.8 kg/m2) with a similar BMI to Group 1 at the time of IVF treatment; and Group 3: 83 non-operated severely obese women (non-exposed to bariatric surgery, mean BMI = 37.7 kg/m2). The main outcome measure was the CLBR. Secondary outcomes were the number of mature oocytes retrieved and embryos obtained, implantation and miscarriage rates, live birth rate per transfer as well as birthweight. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: No significant difference in CLBR between the operated Group 1 patients and the two non-operated Groups 2 and 3 was observed (22.9%, 25.9%, and 12.0%, in Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively). No significant difference in average number of mature oocytes and embryos obtained was observed among the three groups. The implantation rates were not different between Groups 1 and 2 (13.8% versus 13.7%), and although lower (6.9%) in obese women of Group 3, this difference was not statistically significant. Miscarriage rates in Groups 1, 2 and 3 were 38.7%, 35.8% and 56.5%, respectively (P = 0.256). Live birth rate per transfer in obese patients was significantly lower compared to the other two groups (20%, 18%, 9.3%, respectively, in Groups 1, 2 and 3, P = 0.0167). Multivariate analysis revealed that a 1-unit lower BMI increased the chances of live birth by 9%. In operated women, a significantly smaller weight for gestational age was observed in newborns of Group 1 compared to Group 3 (P = 0.04). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study was conducted in France and nearly all patients were Caucasian, questioning the generalizability of the results in other countries and ethnicities. Moreover, 950 women per group would be needed to achieve a properly powered study in order to detect a significant improvement in live birth rate after bariatric surgery as compared to infertile obese women. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: These data fuel the debate on the importance of pluridisciplinary care of infertile obese women, and advocate for further discussion on whether bariatric surgery should be proposed in severely obese infertile women before IVF. However, in light of the present results, infertile women with a history of bariatric surgery can be reassured that surgery-induced dramatic weight loss has no significant impact on IVF prognosis. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by unrestricted grants from FINOX-Gédéon Richter and FERRING Pharmaceuticals awarded to the ART center of the Clinique Mathilde to fund the data collection and the statistical analysis. There are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02884258.

Liver test abnormalities in patients admitted for severe psoriasis: prevalence and associated risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Few epidemiologic data are available regarding biologic liver abnormalities during psoriasis flares. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of biological liver test abnormalities (LTA) in a psoriasis population and the risk factors associated with LTA. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study in four hospital dermatology tertiary care centres included patients admitted for severe psoriasis flare between 1st January 2010 and 31st December 2011. During the same period, a control population was selected comprising patients admitted for contact and/or atopic eczema. Data were collected on hospital records and biology software. LTA was defined as serum AST and/or ALT and/or ALP concentration above the upper normal limit (UNL) and/or GGT concentration above 2 UNL. Prevalence of LTA with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) was compared between the psoriatic and control populations. Factors associated with LTA at P < 0.05 were considered for the final multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty psoriasis patients and 96 eczema control patients were included. One hundred and fifty-five(64.6%) of the psoriasis patients were male, aged 55 years on average (±17.6); 192 (80.0%) had plaque-type psoriasis (PV) and 52 (21.6%) had localized (n = 32) or generalized (n = 20) pustular psoriasis (PP). Prevalence of LTA was 36% (95% CI, 30-42) in the psoriatic population, significantly higher than in controls (17%, 95% CI 9.5-25). Risk factors independently associated with LTA comprised PV (OR 3.79; 95% CI 1.48-9.65), PP (OR 3.80; 95% CI 1.40-10.25) and previously diagnosed liver disease (underlying hepatic steatosis, viral hepatitis or excessive alcohol consumption) (OR 3.88; 95% CI 2.02-7.45). No association was found with systemic antipsoriatic drug therapies. CONCLUSION: In severe psoriasis, liver impacting comorbidities and/or specific psoriatic inflammation, the latter mostly in PP cases, more than drug-related liver toxicity, appears to predominantly account for LTA. Clinicians should be aware of this, to avoid unjustified withdrawal of useful systemic drugs.

[Overall treatment time assessment of radiotherapy delivered in a curative intent: A prospective study]. / Respect de l'étalement de la radiothérapie à visée curative : étude prospective.

PURPOSE: To assess the overall treatment time of radiotherapy delivered with curative intent in a cohort of 185 consecutive patients and the causes of this possible delay. If delay, to propose corrective actions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report a single-center prospective study including all consecutive patients receiving a radiation therapy with curative intent, from 1st December 2013 to 28th February 2014, on the three linear accelerators of the radiotherapy department. For each fraction missed, the causes of non-completion were prospectively collected. This analysis took into account the following parameters: age, sex, occupation, transport type and duration, tumour localization, radiation dose, concomitant chemotherapy, hospitalization, type of linear accelerator. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-five patients were included in the study (183 evaluable, two did not complete treatment). The overall treatment time was respected for 31 patients (17%). It was lengthened on 4.6 days (d) (0-29 d; median: 3d). The mean number of delayed fractions was 3.4 (0-17; median: 2). The reasons of delay were: breakdown 32.2%; maintenance 29.3%; holiday 11%; treatment toxicity 9.4%; inadequate planning 8.6%; other disease 3.9%; treatment refusal 2.1%; unspecified personal reasons 1.5%; refusal to wait 0.8%; transportation 0.3%; error of communication 0.3%; other 0.6%. Two parameters had a significant impact on the overall treatment time: the type of linear accelerator in relation to breakdown occurrence (P<0.001) and transportation duration (more or less than 40 min, P=0.022). One hundred and thirty-eight patients (75%) and 79 patients (43%) were treated on one or more than two Saturdays. Treatment on Saturday significantly reduced the overall treatment time (median, 1.9 d; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The overall treatment time was globally respected excluding break down and maintenance. Their impact on the overall treatment time is minimized by the systematic opening of the department on Saturdays.

Nodular progression of lentigo malignant melanoma during a treatment with tocilizumab: cause or coincidence?

Tocilizumab is an anti-interleukin (IL)-6 receptor monoclonal antibody, used since 2010 for the treatment of severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is known to induce infection, similarly to other biotherapies which modulate immune response and cytokines. Few cases of malignancy, however, have as yet been reported. We describe here the case of a patient with severe RA, previously treated with prednisolone, methotrexate, leflunomide, etanercept, and rituximab, who, after 8 months of treatment with tocilizumab, developed rapidly progressive nodular melanoma on a preexisting pigmented lesion on her left cheek. Recently, another case of nodular melanoma under tocilizumab has been published. The possible causative role of tocilizumab and other immunomodulatory agents in the development of this malignancy is discussed. Based on the present case, dermatologic screening is recommended before initiation of tocilizumab.