A decline in hepatitis B virus surface antigen (hbsag) predicts clearance, but does not correlate with quantitative hbeag or HBV DNA levels.

BACKGROUND: The elimination of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) is the final goal of hepatitis B treatment, but is rarely achieved. As quantitative assays for HBsAg recently became available, we have investigated whether quantitative HBsAg measurements can substitute for hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA quantification in treatment monitoring. METHODS: Within this study, 23 liver transplant patients and 18 heart transplant recipients were retrospectively analysed. Patients had been treated with famciclovir and/or lamivudine, in addition some had also received adefovir in cases of lamivudine resistance. Quantitative HBsAg and hepatitis B virus e antigen (HBeAg) levels were determined with the Architect assay. HBV DNA levels were determined with different assays available at given time points. RESULTS: We did not find a significant correlation between either HBsAg or HBeAg and HBV DNA levels - both in treated and untreated patients. More importantly, there was no significant concordance between an increase or decrease of HBsAg or HBeAg with HBV DNA. However, the curve and decline of quantitative HBsAg enabled prediction of eventual viral clearance. Eight patients showed a 2 log10 drop of HBsAg levels and eight patients demonstrated a reduction of HBsAg levels below 100 IU/ml; five patients fulfilled both criteria. Three of those five cleared HBsAg and became positive for antibodies against HBsAg. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative HBsAg and HBeAg cannot substitute for HBV DNA quantification during the assessment of antiviral therapy; however, the decline of HBsAg does predict eventual HBsAg clearance. A 2 log10 drop to below 100 IU/ml is associated with a high likelihood of HBsAg clearance.

Kinetics of hepatitis C viral RNA and HCV-antigen during dialysis sessions: evidence for differential viral load reduction on dialysis.

Hepatitis C infection is a common problem in dialysis units. The prevalence ranges from 3% to more than 50%. Several reports have described a variable reduction of HCV-RNA during hemodialysis treatment sessions. But so far nothing is known about the HCV antigenemia or the kinetics of the reduction of HCV-RNA and HCV antigenemia during these sessions. HCV-RNA was monitored using the VERSANT HCV bDNA assay 3.0 (Bayer Healthcare Diagnostics, Leverkusen, Germany) or the HCV-Monitor TaqMan (Roche Diagnostics). HCV antigenemia was tested by using Ortho-trac-C assay (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Neckargemünd, Germany). Kinetics of HCV-RNA were available in 15 dialysis sessions measured by bDNA assay and in 5 dialysis sessions measured by rt-PCR. Quantitative HCV-antigenemia was available in fourteen dialysis sessions. Not only HCV-RNA but as expected also the HCV-antigenemia fell during the dialysis session. However, while the average reduction of HCV-antigen appears steady and linear, the level of HCV-RNA seems to be stable during the first 3 hr of dialysis, and decreases rapidly during the last 2 hr. The results seem to be independent of the HCV-RNA detection method. The different kinetics of HCV RNA and HCV antigen load suggest that there are different mechanisms responsible for the reduction of the HCV antigen and HCV-RNA, respectively. Reduction of viral load during dialysis session indicates a potential benefit of dialysis in case of HCV associated antiviral therapy.

HBsAg level at time of liver transplantation determines HBsAg decrease and anti-HBs increase and affects HBV DNA decrease during early immunoglobulin administration.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Administration of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) initially after liver transplantation of hepatitis B patients is considered important to prevent reinfection reliably. However, dosing schedules differ considerably between centers. We measured HBsAg, anti-HBs and HBV DNA kinetics to create a rational basis for dosing schemes. METHODS: Thirteen patients (group A) received 10,000 IU HBIG in the anhepatic phase followed by 10,000 IU daily until HBsAg became negative, whereas five patients (group B) received 20,000 IU followed by 5000 IU every 30 min. RESULTS: HBsAg levels at time of transplantation ranged from 0.12 to 12,990 IU/ml. Correlations between initial HBsAg and HBIG required to decrease HBsAg below 1 IU/ml were high in groups A and B (r=0.97, p<0.001; r=1.00, p<0.001), as were correlations between initial HBsAg and HBIG required to raise anti-HBs above 1000 IU/l (r=0.94, p<0.001; r=1.00, p<0.001). In 11 HBV DNA-positive patients, DNA levels became negative in seven, and dropped by 2.5 log10 (mean) in the other four patients during immunoglobulin administration. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, required HBIG doses to decrease HBsAg and raise anti-HBs are determined by HBsAg levels at time of transplantation, not by HBV DNA levels. Shortened HBIG dosing intervals accelerate HBsAg decrease and anti-HBs increase. HBV DNA decreases rapidly during HBIG administration in most patients.