Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; (317): 131-40, 1995 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7671467

ABSTRACT

Forty-five patients (50 hips) at risk for heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty who received a single dose of 6 Gy postoperative irradiation were compared with a historical control group of 42 patients (50 hips) with similar risk factors who did not receive radiation prophylaxis. All surgeries were done by the same surgeon using the same perioperative protocol. Radiation was delivered through anteroposterior/posteroanterior limited fields, avoiding areas of desired bony ingrowth. Of those hips that received radiation, Grade II or III heterotopic bone developed in 6% and Grade IV heterotopic bone developed in none. Of the control group, Grade II or III heterotopic bone developed in 34% of the hips and Grade IV heterotopic bone in 6%. The radiated hips had a significant net gain in abduction and adduction when compared with the nonradiated hips. No early complications were noted in association with the radiation treatment. A single dose of 6 Gy of radiation given within the first 3 postoperative days provides effective prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification developing after total hip arthroplasty in high risk patients.


Subject(s)
Hip Prosthesis , Ossification, Heterotopic/prevention & control , Ossification, Heterotopic/radiotherapy , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Aged , Humans , Osteoarthritis/surgery , Radiation Dosage , Range of Motion, Articular , Retrospective Studies
3.
Am J Sports Med ; 14(1): 88-91, 1986.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3752353

ABSTRACT

Eighty-five patients with knee injuries were included in a 4 month retrospective study that compared the relative accuracy of the Lachman test, the anterior drawer sign, and the pivot shift test. All examinations were performed under anesthesia and followed by arthroscopy, which confirmed 22 injuries. Of all ACL injuries occurring within 2 weeks of arthroscopy (N = 9), the pivot shift test was the most sensitive (88.8%), followed by the Lachman test with a 77.7% sensitivity. The anterior drawer sign was the least sensitive at 22.2%. All had specificities more than 95%. For all injuries of more than 2 weeks (N = 13), the Lachman and pivot shift tests were 84.6% sensitive, while the anterior drawer sign increased to a sensitivity of 53.8%. Again, all were specific to more than 95%. For all ACL injuries, irrespective of age, the Lachman test was 81.8% sensitive and 96.8% specific; the anterior drawer sign was 40.9% sensitive and 95.2% specific; and the pivot shift was 81.8% sensitive and 98.4% specific. The data support an accurate preoperative diagnosis in ACL deficient knees when the Lachman and pivot shift tests are positive, and essentially rules out this type of injury when these tests are negative. The anterior drawer sign, although widely used, is a poor diagnostic indicator of ACL injuries, especially in the acute setting.


Subject(s)
Knee Injuries/diagnosis , Ligaments, Articular/injuries , Physical Examination/standards , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Chronic Disease , Humans , Middle Aged , Physical Examination/methods , Retrospective Studies , Rupture
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...