Late onset of invasive aspergillus infection in bone marrow transplant patients at a university hospital.

Despite new antifungal treatment strategies, invasive aspergillosis (IA) remains a principal cause of infectious mortality after bone marrow transplantation (BMT). We reviewed the medical records of 93 allogeneic and 149 autologous transplant recipients during a 20 month period, with attention to cases of proven or probable IA. No autologous transplant recipient developed IA, whereas IA was seen in 15.1% of allogeneic recipients (including two of five patients with a prior history of IA despite prophylaxis), for an overall incidence of 5.8%. The median time to occurrence was 92 days post transplant, with no de novo cases developing prior to engraftment. Survival 100 days from diagnosis was 29%. Risk factors for the development of IA included > or = 21 days of corticosteroid therapy of >or= 1mg/kg/day and post-transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. These two risk factors were statistically linked. Our data illustrate a shift toward a later occurrence of post-transplant IA, suggesting a need for close, prolonged surveillance in the outpatient environment. The contributory role of protracted corticosteroid use is also highlighted. These data have important implications in an era of alternate donor transplants and more intense immunosuppression. Established strategies implementing newer, less toxic antifungal agents as prophylaxis in high-risk patients are needed.

Dose-intensive therapy for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Major challenges remain to be overcome to increase the cure rate for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), especially for middle-aged and older adults. Despite high rates of complete remission (CR), many patients relapse after chemotherapy alone. Dose-intensive therapy and stem-cell transplantation (SCT) have been able to rescue some of these patients. However, many patients presently are being cured using intensive consolidation chemotherapy during first remission (CRI) and at a lower cost and toxicity than with SCT. The use of SCT in CRI should be governed by an assessment of known risk factors. Among younger adults in the prime transplant age group (< 50 years), there is no advantage to allogeneic (allo)-SCT across the board, but it is recommended for those with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL or pro-B ALL with t(4;11) and possibly for those with B-lineage ALL and initial WBC counts > 100,000/microL. There is as yet no evidence that allo-SCT can improve the already high cure rate achieved with chemotherapy alone in favorable subsets such as T-cell ALL. There appears to be no advantage to autologous (auto)-SCT over chemotherapy for consolidation of either high-risk or standard-risk patients in CRI. The argument that early use of auto-SCT shortens the duration of treatment and thereby improves the quality of life is not persuasive, as there is little morbidity from maintenance chemotherapy. Patients who receive a modern, intensive multiagent chemotherapy program for CRI but later relapse are unlikely to be cured with additional chemotherapy alone. High-grade multidrug resistance develops rapidly. These patients should undergo allo-SCT if possible. Unfortunately, allo-SCT is available to only a minority of such patients because of the lack of a donor or insurance coverage, or the presence of comorbid conditions or older age. The use of alternative donors (either matched, unrelated donors or partially human leukocyte antigen [HLA] matched family members) is appropriate in this circumstance. Auto-SCT with or without previously used purging methods is ineffective for patients with advanced ALL.