ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The standard first-line therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication are based on clarithromycin and amoxicillin or metronidazole. Recent studies suggested levofloxacin as an alternative option for both first-and second-line H. pylori eradication treatment. AIMS: To compare efficacy and tolerability of two different 7-day standard triple therapies versus 7-day levofloxacin-based triple therapy in first-line treatment for H. pylori infection. METHODS: Three hundred consecutive H. pylori positive patients were randomized to receive: clarithromycin, amoxicillin, esomeprazole (Group A: N = 100); clarithromycin, metronidazole, esomeprazole (Group B: N = 100); or clarithromycin, levofloxacin, esomeprazole (Group C: N = 100). H. pylori status was rechecked by (13)C urea breath test 6 wk after the end of therapy. RESULTS: Sixteen out of 300 patients discontinued treatment because of the occurrence of side effects (Group A, 5; Group B, 7; Group C, 4). The eradication rates in intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses were: Group A, 75% and 79%; Group B, 72% and 77.4%; and Group C, 87% and 90.6%. The eradication rate achieved with levofloxacin-based triple therapy was significantly higher than that with standard therapies in either ITT (87%vs 75%, p <0.05; 87%vs 72%, p <0.01;) or PP analysis (90.6%vs 79%, p <0.05; 90.6 vs 77.4, p <0.05). No difference was found between standard triple therapies. The incidence of side effects was similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS: A 7-day levofloxacin-based triple therapy can achieve higher H. pylori eradication rates than standard regimens. These data suggest levofloxacin-based regimens can be the most effective in first-line anti-H. pylori therapy, at least in the Italian population.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Gastritis/drug therapy , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Helicobacter pylori/isolation & purification , Levofloxacin , Ofloxacin/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Biopsy , Clarithromycin/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Esomeprazole/therapeutic use , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gastric Mucosa/microbiology , Gastric Mucosa/pathology , Gastritis/epidemiology , Gastritis/microbiology , Helicobacter Infections/epidemiology , Helicobacter Infections/microbiology , Helicobacter pylori/drug effects , Humans , Male , Metronidazole/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Triple therapy is the treatment of choice for Helicobacter pylori-infected patients with an eradication rate ranging from 70 to 85%. Poor compliance and antibiotic resistance are the main causes of treatment failure. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of rifaximin, a poorly absorbed antibiotic, for H. pylori eradication. METHODS: We enrolled 48 consecutive H. pylori-positive patients affected. They were randomized to receive two 7-day rifaximin-based triple therapies: rifaximin tablets 400 mg t.i.d., esomeprazole 40 mg o.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. (CRE) or levofloxacin 500 mg o.d. (LRE). H. pylori eradication was assessed using a (13)C-urea breath test 4 weeks after the end of therapy. Treatment compliance and the incidence of side effects were also evaluated. RESULTS: No dropouts were observed. The eradication rate both on intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis did not show significant differences between groups: 58% (14/24 patients) in group 1 and 42% (10/24 patients) in group 2 (p = 0.24, OR 1.96, 95% CI 0.62-6.18). No significant differences in patients' compliance and incidence of side effects were found between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Rifaximin-based therapy showed optimal compliance but a limited eradication rate compared to standard first-line treatment. Further investigations are needed to evaluate different dosages and combinations.
