Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 63
Filter
1.
Urology ; 172: 89-96, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36400270

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the transition from IMPACT, a disease-focused treatment program, to comprehensive health insurance under Medicaid through the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on general and prostate cancer-specific quality of life (QoL) on a cohort of previously uninsured low-income men. We hypothesize that general QoL would improve and prostate cancer-specific QoL would remain the same after the transition to comprehensive health insurance. METHODS: We assessed and compared general QoL using the RAND SF-12v2™ (12-Item Short Form Survey, version 2) and prostate cancer-specific QoL using the UCLA PCI (Prostate Cancer Index) one year before, at, and one year after the transition between 30 men who transitioned to comprehensive insurance (newly insured/Medicaid group) and 54 men who remained in the prostate cancer program (uninsured/IMPACT group). We assessed the independent effects of Medicaid coverage on QoL outcomes using repeated-measures regression. RESULTS: Our cohort was composed primarily of Hispanic men (82%). At transition, patient demographics and clinical characteristics were similar between the groups. General and prostate cancer-specific QoL did not differ between the groups and remained stable over time, Radical prostatectomy as primary treatment and shorter time since treatment were associated with worse urinary and sexual function across both groups and over all three time points. CONCLUSION: Those who transitioned to full-scope insurance and those who remained in the free prostate cancer-focused treatment program had stable general and prostate cancer-specific QoL. High-touch navigation aspects of a disease-focused program may have contributed to stability in outcomes.


Subject(s)
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , United States , Humans , Quality of Life , Insurance, Major Medical , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Hispanic or Latino , Insurance, Health , Insurance Coverage
2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 220(2): 201.e1-201.e19, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30403975

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Under value-based payment programs, patient-reported experiences and outcomes can impact hospital and physician revenue. To enable obstetrical providers to improve the childbirth experience, a framework for understanding what women expect and desire during childbirth is needed. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify key predictors of childbirth hospital satisfaction with the use of the Childbirth Experiences Survey. STUDY DESIGN: This study builds on a larger effort that used Patient-Reported Outcomes Management Information System methods to develop a childbirth-specific preliminary patient-reported experiences and outcomes item bank. These efforts led to the development of an antepartum and postpartum survey (Childbirth Experiences Survey Parts 1 and 2). All phases of the study were conducted with the participation of a community-based research team. We conducted a prospective observational study using national survey response panels that was organized through Nielsen to identify women's antepartum values and preferences for childbirth (Childbirth Experiences Survey Part 1). Eligible participants were pregnant women in the United States (English or Spanish speaking) who were ≥18 years old and ≥20 weeks pregnant. Women were recontacted and invited to participate in a postpartum follow-up survey to collect information about their childbirth patient-reported experiences and outcomes, which included childbirth satisfaction (Childbirth Experiences Survey Part 2). In bivariate analyses, we tested whether predisposing conditions (eg, patient characteristics or previous experiences), values and preferences, patient-reported experiences and outcomes, and the "gaps" between values and preferences and patient-reported experiences and outcomes were predictors of women's satisfaction with hospital childbirth services. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to examine the simultaneous effect of predictors on hospital satisfaction, which were adjusted for key predisposing conditions. RESULTS: From 500 women who anticipated a vaginal delivery at the time of the antepartum survey, who labored before delivery, and who answered the postpartum survey, key findings included the following responses: (1) the strongest predictors of women's satisfaction with hospital childbirth services were items in the domains of staff communication, compassion, empathy, and respect, and (2) 23 childbirth-specific patient-reported experiences and outcomes were identified. Examples of these patient-reported experiences and outcomes (such as being told about progress in labor and being involved in decisions regarding labor pain management) appeared especially relevant to women who experienced childbirth. A final model that predicted women's satisfaction with hospital childbirth services included a total of 8 items that could be optimized by doctors, midwives, and hospitals. These included the patient's report of how well she coped with labor pain, whether the hospital provided adequate space and food for their support person, and whether she received practical support for feeding the newborn infant. CONCLUSION: This study identified 23 childbirth-specific patient-reported experiences and outcomes that were predictors of childbirth hospital satisfaction. The implementation of the Childbirth Experiences Survey Parts 1 and 2 in a multihospital setting may lead to the development of childbirth hospital performance measures and strategies for improvement of the childbirth experience.


Subject(s)
Delivery, Obstetric/standards , Hospitals/standards , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , United States , Young Adult
3.
Health Serv Res ; 53(5): 3373-3399, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29797513

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To develop a conceptual framework and preliminary item bank for childbirth-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) domains. DATA SOURCES: Women, who were U.S. residents, ≥18 years old, and ≥20 weeks pregnant, were surveyed regarding their childbirth values and preferences (V&P) using online panels. STUDY DESIGN: Using community-based research techniques and Patient-Reported Outcomes Management Information System (PROMIS® ) methodology, we conducted a comprehensive literature review to identify self-reported survey items regarding patient-reported V&P and childbirth experiences and outcomes (PROs). The V&P/PRO domains were validated by focus groups. We conducted a cross-sectional observational study and fitted a multivariable logistic regression model to each V&P item to describe "who" wanted each item. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We identified 5,880 V&P/PRO items that mapped to 19 domains and 58 subdomains. We present results for the 2,250 survey respondents who anticipated a vaginal delivery in a hospital. Wide variation existed regarding each V&P item, and personal characteristics, such as maternal confidence and ability to cope well with pain, were frequent predictors in the models. The resulting preliminary item bank consisted of 60 key personal characteristics and 63 V&P/PROs. CONCLUSIONS: The conceptual framework and preliminary (PROMIS® ) item bank presented here provide a foundation for the development of childbirth-specific V&P/PROs.


Subject(s)
Delivery, Obstetric , Patient Preference , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Patient Satisfaction , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Pregnancy , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
4.
Patient ; 11(2): 155-166, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29030831

ABSTRACT

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been widely used in healthcare policy, practice, and for suggesting future research. As patients increasingly become involved in CPG development to produce patient-centered recommendations, more research is needed on methods to engage patients, particularly methods allowing for scalable engagement of large, diverse, and geographically distributed groups of patients. In this article, we discuss practical considerations for using online methods to engage patients in CPG development. To inform this discussion, we conducted a rapid, systematic review of literature on patient involvement in CPG development and used qualitative evidence synthesis techniques to make inferences about potential advantages and challenges of using online methods to engage patients in this context. We identified 79 articles containing information about involving patients in CPG development. Potential advantages include the ability of online methods to facilitate greater openness and honesty by patients, as well as to reflect the diversity of patient views, which in turn further improve the utility of CPGs. Potential challenges of using online methods may include the extra skill, time, and certain types of resources that may be needed for patient engagement, as well as the difficulty engaging specific patient populations. However, these challenges are mitigated by growing calls for patient engagement as normative for CPG development in addition to patients' increasing familiarity with online technologies. These practical considerations should be examined empirically as guideline development groups further explore the appropriateness of using online methods to engage patients across different stages of CPG development.


Subject(s)
Internet , Patient Participation/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Decision Making , Humans , Research Design , Time Factors
5.
JMIR Res Protoc ; 6(4): e57, 2017 Apr 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28455279

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines provide systematically developed recommendations for deciding on appropriate health care options for specific conditions and clinical circumstances. Up until recently, patients and caregivers have rarely been included in the process of developing care guidelines. OBJECTIVE: This project will develop and test a new online method for including patients and their caregivers in this process using Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) care guidelines as an example. The new method will mirror and complement the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM)-the gold standard approach for conducting clinical expert panels that uses a modified Delphi format. RAM is often used in clinical guideline development to determine care appropriateness and necessity in situations where existing clinical evidence is uncertain, weak, or unavailable. METHODS: To develop the new method for engaging patients and their caregivers in guideline development, we will first conduct interviews with experts on RAM, guideline development, patient engagement, and patient-centeredness and engage with Duchenne patients and caregivers to identify how RAM should be modified for the purposes of patient engagement and what rating criteria should patients and caregivers use to provide their input during the process of guideline development. Once the new method is piloted, we will test it by conducting two concurrently run patient/caregiver panels that will rate patient-centeredness of a subset of DMD care management recommendations already deemed clinically appropriate and necessary. The ExpertLens™ system-a previously evaluated online modified Delphi system that combines two rounds of rating with a round of feedback and moderated online discussions-will be used to conduct these panels. In addition to developing and testing the new engagement method, we will work with the members of our project's Advisory Board to generate a list of best practices for enhancing the level of patient and caregiver involvement in the guideline development process. We will solicit input on these best practice from Duchenne patients, caregivers, and clinicians by conducting a series of round-table discussions and making a presentation at an annual conference on Duchenne. RESULTS: The study protocol was reviewed by RAND's Human Subjects Protection Committee, which determined it to be exempt from review. Interviews with RAM experts have been completed. The projected study completion date is May 2020. CONCLUSIONS: We expect that the new method will make it easier to engage large numbers of patients and caregivers in the process of guideline development in a rigorous and culturally appropriate manner that is consistent with the way clinicians participate in guideline development. Moreover, this project will develop best practices that could help involve patients and caregivers in the clinical guideline development process in other clinical areas, thereby facilitating the work of guideline developers.

6.
JMIR Res Protoc ; 5(1): e11, 2016 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26832213

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Older adults can experience unfavorable health effects from drinking at relatively low consumption levels because of age-related physiological changes and alcohol's potentially adverse interactions with declining health, increased medication-use and diminishing functional status. At the same time, alcohol use in older adults may be protective against heart disease, stroke, and other disorders associated with aging. We developed "A Toast to Health in Later Life! Wise Drinking as We Age," a web-based educational intervention to teach older adults to balance drinking risks and benefits. OBJECTIVE: To examine the intervention's feasibility in a sample of community-dwelling current drinkers ≥55 years of age and examine its effects on their quantity and frequency of alcohol use, adherence to standard drinking guidelines, and alcohol-related risks. METHODS: Participants were recruited in person, by mail and by telephone between September and October 2014 from a community-based social services organization serving Los Angeles County. Once enrolled, participants were randomly assigned to the intervention or to a control group. The conceptual frameworks for the intervention were the Health Belief Model, models of adult learning, and the US Department of Health and Human Services guidelines for designing easy-to-use websites. The intervention's content focuses on the relationship between drinking and its effects on older adults' medical conditions, use of medications, and ability to perform daily activities. It also addresses quantity and frequency of alcohol use, drinking and driving and binge drinking. The control group did not receive any special intervention. Data on alcohol use and risks for both groups came from the online version of the Alcohol-Related Problems Survey and were collected at baseline and four weeks later. Data on usability were collected online from the intervention group immediately after it completed its review of the website. RESULTS: The 49 intervention and 47 control participants did not differ at baseline in age, ethnicity, medication use, medical conditions, or alcohol use and both groups were mostly female, college-educated, and in good health. Of the intervention participants, 94% (46/49) had little or no difficulty using the website, with 67% (33/49) reporting that they will change the way they think about drinking because of their exposure to the education. At the 4-week follow-up, the intervention group reported drinking less (P=.02). No changes between groups were found in quantity and frequency, adherence to recommended guidelines, or risk status. CONCLUSIONS: Community-dwelling older adults are receptive to online alcohol education. To be most effective, the education should be included as a component of a larger effort consisting of screening and counseling preferably in a health care setting.

7.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 28(2): 227-32, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26857941

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Several barriers challenge resident engagement in learning quality improvement (QI). We investigated whether the incorporation of team-based game mechanics into an evidence-based online learning platform could increase resident participation in a QI curriculum. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary-care medical center residency training programs. PARTICIPANTS: Resident physicians (n = 422) from nine training programs (anesthesia, emergency medicine, family medicine, internal medicine, ophthalmology, orthopedics, pediatrics, psychiatry and general surgery) randomly allocated to a team competition environment (n = 200) or the control group (n = 222). INTERVENTION: Specialty-based team assignment with leaderboards to foster competition, and alias assignment to de-identify individual participants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participation in online learning, as measured by percentage of questions attempted (primary outcome) and additional secondary measures of engagement (i.e. response time). Changes in participation measures over time between groups were assessed with a repeated measures ANOVA framework. RESULTS: Residents in the intervention arm demonstrated greater participation than the control group. The percentage of questions attempted at least once was greater in the competition group (79% [SD ± 32] versus control, 68% [SD ± 37], P= 0.03). Median response time was faster in the competition group (P= 0.006). Differences in participation continued to increase over the duration of the intervention, as measured by average response time and cumulative percent of questions attempted (each P< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Team competition increases resident participation in an online course delivering QI content. Medical educators should consider game mechanics to optimize participation when designing learning experiences.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Continuing/methods , Quality Improvement , Competitive Behavior , Education, Medical, Continuing/organization & administration , Female , Humans , Internship and Residency , Male , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/standards , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/standards
8.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 213(4): 523.e1-8, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26275353

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to describe the resources and activities associated with childbirth services. STUDY DESIGN: We adapted models for assessing the quality of healthcare to generate a conceptual framework hypothesizing that childbirth hospital resources and activities contributed to maternal and neonatal outcomes. We used this framework to guide development of a survey, which we administered by telephone to hospital labor and delivery nurse managers in California. We describe the findings by hospital type (ie, integrated delivery system [IDS], teaching, and other [community] hospitals). RESULTS: Of 248 nonmilitary childbirth hospitals in California, 239 (96%)responded; 187 community, 27 teaching, and 25 IDS hospitals reported. The context of services varied across hospital types, with community hospitals more likely to have for-profit ownership, be in a rural or isolated location, and have fewer annual deliveries per hospital. Results included the findings of the following: (1) 24 hour anesthesia availability in 50% of community vs 100% of IDS and teaching hospitals (P < .001); (2) 24 hour in-house labor and delivery physician coverage in 5% of community vs 100% of IDS and 48% of teaching hospitals (P < .001); (3) 24 hour blood bank availability in 88% of community vs 96% of IDS and 100% of teaching hospitals (P = .092); (4) adult subspecialty intensive care unit availability in 33% of community vs 36% of IDS and 82% of teaching hospitals (P < .001); (5) ability to perform emergency cesarean delivery in 30 minutes 100% of the time in 56% of community vs 100% of IDS and 85% of teaching hospitals (P < .001); (6) pediatric care available both day and night in 54% of community vs 63% of IDS vs 76% of teaching hospitals (P = .087); and (7) no neonatal intensive care unit in 44% of community vs 12% of IDS and 4% of teaching hospitals (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Childbirth services varied widely across California hospitals. Cognizance of this variation and linkage of these data to childbirth outcomes should assist in the identification of key resources and activities that optimize the hospital environment for pregnant women and set the groundwork for identifying criteria for the provision of maternal risk-appropriate care.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Hospitals, Community/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Teaching/statistics & numerical data , Medical Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Parturition , Anesthesia, Obstetrical/statistics & numerical data , Blood Banks/statistics & numerical data , California , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delivery, Obstetric/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand , Hospitals , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Maternal Health Services , Nursing Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Obstetrics/statistics & numerical data , Pediatrics/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Surveys and Questionnaires
9.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 213(4): 527.e1-527.e12, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26196455

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Measures of maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity have risen in the United States, sparking national interest regarding hospitals' ability to provide maternal risk-appropriate care. We examined the extent to which hospitals could be classified by increasingly sophisticated maternal levels of care. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a cross-sectional survey to identify hospital-specific resources and classify hospitals by criteria for basic, intermediate, and regional maternal levels of care in all nonmilitary childbirth hospitals in California. We measured hospital compliance with maternal level of care criteria that were produced via consensus based on professional standards at 2 regional summits funded by the March of Dimes through a cooperative agreement with the Community Perinatal Network in 2007 (California Perinatal Summit on Risk-Appropriate Care). RESULTS: The response rate was 96% (239 of 248 hospitals). Only 82 hospitals (34%) were classifiable under these criteria (35 basic, 42 intermediate, and 5 regional) because most (157 [66%]) did not meet the required set of basic criteria. The unmet criteria preventing assignment into the basic category included the ability to perform a cesarean delivery within 30 minutes 100% of the time (only 64% met), pediatrician availability day and night (only 56% met), and radiology department ultrasound capability within 12 hours (only 83% met). Only 29 of classified hospitals (35%) had a nursery or neonatal intensive care unit level that matched the maternal level of care, and for most remaining hospitals (52 of 53), the neonatal intensive care unit level was higher than the maternal care level. CONCLUSION: Childbirth services varied widely across California hospitals, and most hospitals did not fit easily into proposed levels. Cognizance of this existing variation is critical to determining the optimal configuration of services for basic, intermediate, and regional maternal levels of care.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/standards , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Hospitals/standards , Maternal Health Services/standards , Parturition , Anesthesia, Obstetrical/statistics & numerical data , California , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Medical Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Nurseries, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Obstetrics/statistics & numerical data , Pediatrics/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Quality of Health Care , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Ultrasonography/statistics & numerical data
10.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 213(4): 587.e1-587.e13, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26026921

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the impact of the laborist staffing model on cesarean rates and maternal morbidity in California community hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study comparing cesarean rates, vaginal birth after cesarean rates, composite maternal morbidity, and severe maternal morbidity for laboring women in California community hospitals with and without laborists. We conducted interviews with nurse managers to obtain data regarding hospital policies, practices, and the presence of laborists, and linked this information with patient-level hospital discharge data for all deliveries in 2012. RESULTS: Of 248 childbirth hospitals, 239 (96.4%) participated; 182 community hospitals were studied, and these hospitals provided 221,247 deliveries for analysis. Hospitals with laborists (n = 43, 23.6%) were busier, had more clinical resources, and cared for higher-risk patients. There was no difference in the unadjusted primary cesarean rate for laborist vs nonlaborist hospitals (11.3% vs 11.7%; P = .382) but there was a higher maternal composite morbidity rate (14.4% vs 12.0%; P = .0006). After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, there were no differences in laborist vs nonlaborist hospitals for any of the specified outcomes. Hospitals with laborists had higher attempted trial of labor after cesarean rates, and lower repeat cesarean rates (90.9% vs 95.9%; P < .0001). However, among women attempting trial of labor after cesarean, there was no difference in the vaginal birth after cesarean success rate. CONCLUSION: We were unable to demonstrate differences in cesarean and maternal childbirth complication rates in community hospitals with and without laborists. Further efforts are needed to understand how the laborist staffing model contributes to neonatal outcomes, cost and efficiency of care, and patient and physician satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Hospitalists , Hospitals, Community , Labor, Obstetric , Obstetric Labor Complications/epidemiology , Obstetrics/statistics & numerical data , Vaginal Birth after Cesarean/statistics & numerical data , California , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Pregnancy
11.
J Appl Gerontol ; 34(5): 633-51, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24652883

ABSTRACT

This mixed-methods study developed and evaluated an online program to improve older adults' skills in identifying high-quality web-based health information. We conducted focus groups and individual interviews to collect data on older adults' preferences for online instruction and information. We used the findings to develop, pilot test, and evaluate an interactive website which was grounded in health behavior change models, adult education, and website construction. Sixty four participants were randomly assigned to Your Health Online: Guiding eSearches or to an analogous slide-based-tutorial and compared in their knowledge, self-efficacy, and program assessment. Experimental participants assigned significantly higher ratings of usability and learning to the new site than controls did to their tutorial although no differences were found in self-efficacy or knowledge. Experimental participants reported that participation was likely to improve future searches. Information is now needed to examine if such programs actually improve health searches, ehealth literacy, and health outcomes.


Subject(s)
Consumer Health Information , Internet/statistics & numerical data , Patient Preference , Program Evaluation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Focus Groups , Health Behavior , Humans , Knowledge , Male , Middle Aged , Random Allocation , Self Efficacy
12.
Australas J Ageing ; 34(1): 33-7, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24118773

ABSTRACT

AIM: The Alcohol-Related Problems Survey (ARPS) reliably classifies drinking as non-hazardous, hazardous or harmful using scoring algorithms that consider quantity and frequency of alcohol use alone and in combination with health conditions, medication-use and functional status. Because it has been developed using a 14-g US standard drink, it is not valid in Australia where a standard drink contains 10 g of ethanol. METHOD: We recalibrated the ARPS scoring algorithms for a 10-g Australian standard drink and updated the list of medications. The Australian ARPS (A-ARPS) was then administered to 50 non-treatment-seeking participants in waves of five. RESULTS: The A-ARPS recalibrated scoring algorithms reliably classified all 50 individuals. Sixty-six per cent were classified as hazardous or harmful drinkers. Many were taking medications that interact with alcohol or had medical conditions that can be exacerbated by alcohol consumption. CONCLUSION: The A-ARPS is available for use in Australia. Its utilisation could reduce the incidence of alcohol-related harms.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Alcohol-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Ethanol/adverse effects , Health Status Indicators , Surveys and Questionnaires , Aged , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Alcohol-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Alcohol-Related Disorders/prevention & control , Algorithms , Australia/epidemiology , Drug Interactions , Feasibility Studies , Female , Geriatric Assessment , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
13.
J Gen Intern Med ; 29(2): 312-9, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24101531

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Alcohol consumption and its interaction with disease, medication use, and functional status may result in serious health problems, but little information exists about the national prevalence of alcohol-related health risk in older adults. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of harmful and hazardous alcohol use and the prevalence of consumption in excess of National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) recommendations, in people aged 65 and older, and by sex and race/ethnicity sub-group. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, using data from the 2005-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of the non-institutionalized U.S. population. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand and eighty-three respondents aged 65 and older who consume alcohol. MAIN MEASURES: Participants' alcohol consumption was classified as Harmful, Hazardous, or Healthwise, in the context of their specific health status, using the Alcohol-Related Problems Survey classification algorithm. KEY RESULTS: Overall, 14.5 % of older drinkers (95 % CI: 12.1 %, 16.8 %) consumed alcohol above the NIAAA's recommended limits. However, when health status was taken into account, 37.4 % of older drinkers (95 % CI: 34.9 %, 40.0 %) had Harmful consumption and 53.3 % (95 % CI: 50.1 %, 56.6 %) had either Hazardous or Harmful consumption. Among light/moderate drinkers, the proportions were 17.7 % (95 % CI: 14.7 %, 20.7 %) and 28.0 % (95 % CI: 24.8 %, 31.1 %), respectively. Male drinkers had significantly greater odds of Hazardous/Harmful consumption than female drinkers (OR = 2.14 [95 % CI: 1.77, 2.6]). Black drinkers had worse health status and significantly greater odds of Hazardous/Harmful consumption than white drinkers (OR = 1.49; 95 % CI: 1.02, 2.17), despite having no greater prevalence of drinking in excess of NIAAA-recommended limits. CONCLUSION: Most older Americans who drink are light/moderate drinkers, yet substantial proportions of such drinkers drink in a manner that is either harmful or hazardous to their health. Older adults with risky alcohol consumption are unlikely to be identified by health care providers if clinicians rely solely on whether patient consumption exceeds the NIAAA-recommended limits.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Alcohol Drinking/trends , National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U.S.)/trends , Nutrition Surveys/trends , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Alcoholism/diagnosis , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Binge Drinking/diagnosis , Binge Drinking/epidemiology , Binge Drinking/trends , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Prevalence , United States/epidemiology
14.
Addiction ; 107(11): 1915-28, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22487136

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To review the transparency of reports of behavioral interventions for pathological gambling and other gambling-related disorders. METHODS: We used the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Nonrandomized Designs (TREND) Statement to develop the 59-question adapted TREND questionnaire (ATQ). Each ATQ question corresponds to a transparency guideline and asks how clearly a study reports its objectives, research design, analytical methods and conclusions. A subset of 23 ATQ questions is considered particularly important. We searched PubMed, PsychINFO and Web of Science to identify experimental evaluations published between 2000 and 2011 aiming to reduce problem gambling behaviors or decrease problems caused by gambling. Twenty-six English-language reports met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed by three abstractors using the ATQ. RESULTS: The average report adhered to 38.4 (65.1%) of the 59 ATQ transparency guidelines. Each of the 59 ATQ questions received positive responses from an average of 16.9 (63.8%) of the reports. The subset of 23 particularly relevant questions received an average of 15.3 (66.5%) positive responses. Thirty-two of 59 (54%) ATQ questions were answered positively by 75% or more of the study reports, while 12 (20.3%) received positive responses by 25% or fewer. Publication year did not affect these findings. CONCLUSIONS: Gambling intervention reports need to improve their transparency by adhering to currently neglected and particularly relevant guidelines. Among them are recommendations for comparing study participants who are lost to follow-up and those who are retained, comparing study participants with the target population, describing methods used to minimize potential bias due to group assignment, and reporting adverse events or unintended effects.


Subject(s)
Behavior Therapy , Gambling/rehabilitation , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
15.
Urol Oncol ; 30(1): 102-8, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22127017

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Since 2001, UCLA has operated IMPACT: Improving Access, Counseling, and Treatment for Californians with Prostate Cancer (CaP). Funded by the California Department of Public Health, with a cumulative budget of over $80 million, the program provides comprehensive care for low-income, uninsured Californian men with biopsy-proven CaP. Health services research conducted with program enrollees, through the UCLA Men's Health Study, yields an opportunity to perform qualitative and quantitative assessments of patient-reported outcomes in these men, all members of historically underserved, primarily minority populations. This review summarizes data from several studies in which validated instruments were administered longitudinally in 727 participants, prospectively measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL), self-efficacy in interactions with physician interactions, social and emotional health, symptom distress, satisfaction with care, and other patient-reported outcomes.


Subject(s)
Medically Uninsured/psychology , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , California , Health Services Research , Humans , Male , Poverty , Prostatic Neoplasms/economics , Survival Rate
16.
J Urol ; 186(5): 1855-61, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21944084

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Self-efficacy is associated with increased participation in treatment decision making and improved health related quality of life. We examined the influence of perceived efficacy in patient-physician interactions on health related quality of life among low income, uninsured men with prostate cancer during a 2-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data derived on participants enrolled in a state funded program providing free prostate cancer treatment and care to indigent men. We used validated instruments to measure patient self-efficacy (confidence in interacting with physicians), and the general and prostate specific health related quality of life outcomes of urinary, sexual and bowel bother, symptom distress, psychological well-being and vitality. We performed repeated measures analysis with general linear mixed modeling to estimate the association of sociodemographic and clinical covariates with health related quality of life. RESULTS: Our cohort included a total of 472 observations in 99 men. Self-efficacy had a measurable effect on subjective measurements of general and disease specific health related quality of life. Men with the lowest self-efficacy had inferior mean health related quality of life scores across all outcomes. Low self-efficacy was significantly associated with worse bowel bother and general symptom distress during the 2-year study period. Similar health related quality of life outcomes trajectories were observed across self-efficacy categories. CONCLUSIONS: Of disadvantaged men with clinically localized prostate cancer those with the lowest self-efficacy in physician interactions fared worst across all measured domains of health related quality of life. Interventions to improve patient-physician communication in this population may provide physicians with a supplemental method by which to address health perceptions, mitigate symptom experience and improve health outcomes.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms/psychology , Quality of Life , Self Efficacy , Aged , Humans , Male , Medically Uninsured , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Poverty , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome
17.
Transfus Med Rev ; 25(3): 232-246.e53, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21498040

ABSTRACT

An international multidisciplinary panel of 15 experts reviewed 494 published articles and used the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to determine the appropriateness of allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion based on its expected impact on outcomes of stable nonbleeding patients in 450 typical inpatient medical, surgical, or trauma scenarios. Panelists rated allogeneic RBC transfusion as appropriate in 53 of the scenarios (11.8%), inappropriate in 267 (59.3%), and uncertain in 130 (28.9%). Red blood cell transfusion was most often rated appropriate (81%) in scenarios featuring patients with hemoglobin (Hb) level 7.9 g/dL or less, associated comorbidities, and age older than 65 years. Red blood cell transfusion was rated inappropriate in all scenarios featuring patients with Hb level 10 g/dL or more and in 71.3% of scenarios featuring patients with Hb level 8 to 9.9 g/dL. Conversely, no scenario with patient's Hb level of 8 g/dL or more was rated as appropriate. Nearly one third of all scenarios were rated uncertain, indicating the need for more research. The observation that allogeneic RBC transfusions were rated as either inappropriate or uncertain in most scenarios in this study supports a more judicious transfusion strategy. In addition, the large number of scenarios in which RBC transfusions were rated as uncertain can serve as a road map to identify areas in need of further investigation.


Subject(s)
Consensus , Erythrocyte Transfusion/methods , Erythrocyte Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Erythrocyte Transfusion/standards , Humans , International Cooperation , Middle Aged , Quality of Health Care , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome
19.
Int J Med Inform ; 80(8): e178-88, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21330191

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The development of readiness metrics for organizational participation in health information exchange is critical for monitoring progress toward, and achievement of, successful inter-organizational collaboration. In preparation for the development of a tool to measure readiness for data-sharing, we tested whether organizational capacities known to be related to readiness were associated with successful participation in an American data-sharing collaborative for quality improvement. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design, using an on-line survey of hospitals in a large, mature data-sharing collaborative organized for benchmarking and improvement in nursing care quality. MEASUREMENTS: Factor analysis was used to identify salient constructs, and identified factors were analyzed with respect to "successful" participation. "Success" was defined as the incorporation of comparative performance data into the hospital dashboard. RESULTS: The most important factor in predicting success included survey items measuring the strength of organizational leadership in fostering a culture of quality improvement (QI Leadership): (1) presence of a supportive hospital executive; (2) the extent to which a hospital values data; (3) the presence of leaders' vision for how the collaborative advances the hospital's strategic goals; (4) hospital use of the collaborative data to track quality outcomes; and (5) staff recognition of a strong mandate for collaborative participation (α=0.84, correlation with Success 0.68 [P<0.0001]). CONCLUSION: The data emphasize the importance of hospital QI Leadership in collaboratives that aim to share data for QI or safety purposes. Such metrics should prove useful in the planning and development of this complex form of inter-organizational collaboration.


Subject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Hospital Information Systems , Total Quality Management , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans
20.
Transfusion ; 51(5): 929-36, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20977487

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anemia is an early indicator of many diseases, yet blood donors with low hematocrit (Hct) often receive inadequate information about its medical importance. We sought to understand the types of information that are and should be provided to these donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Two companion studies were performed. The first investigated blood center practices for care of donors with low Hct including deferral length, information provided, and cutoff values used when referring donors for medical attention. The second was a randomized prospective pilot study comparing behavior of deferred donors receiving an "older" pamphlet providing a list of iron-rich foods or a "newer" pamphlet providing descriptions of common causes of anemia and advice for seeking medical attention. RESULTS: More than 70% of centers defer donors for 1 day. Only 6% defer donors for more than 2 weeks. Most centers provide written and/or verbal information about low Hct. Only 35% have a cutoff value defining significant anemia that requires additional medical attention. In the study of donors with low Hct, significant disease was identified within 3 months after deferral in 2 of 104 subjects: metastatic lung cancer and acute lymphocytic leukemia. Only donors receiving the newer pamphlet reported that it "definitely improved" their ability to speak with their doctor about anemia. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of anemia in blood donors may be an indicator of significant undiagnosed disease. There are wide variations in how centers care for and educate donors with anemia. Donors with anemia should be provided improved and consistent educational information.


Subject(s)
Anemia/blood , Blood Banking/methods , Blood Donors/education , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anemia/diagnosis , Anemia/etiology , Female , Health Behavior , Health Care Surveys , Hematocrit , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pamphlets , Pilot Projects , United States , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...