Characterising the challenges of managing difficult red blood cell alloantibodies in liver transplant recipients.

AIMS: Formation of red blood cell alloantibodies (RBCAs) complicates transfusion support in liver transplantation (LT). Difficult RBCAs (DAs, >3 antibodies or antibodies for which <25% donors are antigen negative) further challenge care. This study characterises DA outcomes relative to non-difficult RBCAs (NDAs). METHODS: Single-centre, retrospective analysis of LT patients (2002-2021). RBCAs were defined as clinically significant antibodies. DAs were compared with NDAs. RESULTS: 89 patients had clinically significant RBCAs (DA=50, NDA=39). More DAs were anti-Jka, anti-M; fewer were anti-E, anti-K (all p<0.05). DA patients often had multiple antibodies (44% vs 12.8% NDA, p=0.0022). Probability of finding antigen-negative blood was lower for DAs (17.4% vs 68.1% NDA, p<0.0001) as was RBCs received (9.4 vs 14.7 units in NDA, p=0.0036). Although survival was similar, patients with DAs had more adverse reactions (8% vs 0%, p=0.128). Some antibodies appeared to occur with specific liver diseases (such as primary sclerosing cholangitis, alcoholic steatohepatitis and recurrent disease); however, due to low sample size, definitive conclusions cannot be made. CONCLUSIONS: DA LT recipients contain >1 RBCA, have a lower probability of finding antigen negative blood and may experience more adverse transfusion event (ATE). Despite this, the incidence of ATEs was still quite low.

One-Year and 18-Month Outcomes in nAMD Patient Eyes Switched to Brolucizumab Alone versus to Brolucizumab Alternating with Other Anti-VEGF Agents.

Objective: Retrospective, real-world study to evaluate visual acuity (VA), anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection intervals, and central macular thickness (CMT) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) eyes switched to brolucizumab only or to brolucizumab alternating with another anti-VEGF. Methods: The overall study population comprised eyes that were given ≥1 brolucizumab injection between 1 October 2019 and 30 November 2021. The brolucizumab-only (BRO) cohort consisted of prior anti-VEGF-treated eyes treated exclusively with ≥3 brolucizumab injections over ≥12 or ≥18 months; the alternating brolucizumab (ALT) cohort comprised prior anti-VEGF-treated eyes treated with ≥2 brolucizumab injections and ≥1 other anti-VEGF over ≥12 or ≥18 months. Results: A total of 482 eyes received ≥1 brolucizumab injection during the study period. Mean VA changes from baseline were -1.1±15.1 letters (BRO cohort; n = 174) and 1.3±13.0 letters (ALT cohort; n = 47) at Month 12, and 0.0±13.5 letters (BRO cohort; n = 95) and -7.3±17.2 letters (ALT cohort; n = 29) at Month 18. Mean changes in injection intervals were +26.9±48.1 days (BRO cohort) and +11.1±17.3 days (ALT cohort) at Month 12 and +36.3±52.3 days (BRO cohort) and +14.0±19.9 days (ALT cohort) at Month 18. Mean changes in CMT were -35.2±108.1 µm (BRO cohort) and -31.5±91.2 µm (ALT cohort) at Month 12 and -38.9±75.0 µm (BRO cohort) and -9.0±59.9 µm (ALT cohort) at Month 18. Intraocular inflammation-related adverse events were recorded in 22/482 (4.6%) eyes. Conclusion: Treatment with either brolucizumab alone or brolucizumab alternating with another anti-VEGF can preserve vision, reduce CMT, and extend anti-VEGF injection intervals in patients with nAMD.

Switching to brolucizumab: injection intervals and visual, anatomical and safety outcomes at 12 and 18 months in real-world eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

BACKGROUND: The anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection interval influences treatment burden and compliance in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). This real-world study investigates visual acuity (VA), injection-interval extension, central macular thickness (CMT) and safety in nAMD eyes switched to the anti-VEGF agent brolucizumab and followed for up to 18 months. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with nAMD who were switched from other anti-VEGF agents to brolucizumab only. Patient eyes were grouped into three nested cohorts with the overall cohort receiving ≥ 1 brolucizumab injection, the second receiving ≥ 3 brolucizumab injections with a follow-up period of ≥ 12 months and the third cohort receiving ≥ 3 brolucizumab injections with a follow-up period of ≥ 18 months. Study endpoints included changes from baseline at 12 or 18 months in VA, injection intervals, and CMT. Sub-group analyses were conducted using baseline injection interval length or baseline VA as qualifiers. RESULTS: Overall, 482 eyes received ≥ 1 brolucizumab injection; 174 eyes received ≥ 3 brolucizumab injections with ≥ 12 months of follow-up, and 95 eyes received ≥ 3 brolucizumab injections with ≥ 18 months of follow-up. VA (mean [95% confidence intervals]) remained stable relative to baseline after 12 months (- 1.1 [- 3.7, 1.6] letters; p = 0.42) and 18 months (0.0 [- 3.1, 3.1] letters; p = 0.98) of brolucizumab treatment, respectively, and pre-switch injection intervals or baseline VA had no notable effect. Following the switch to brolucizumab, injection intervals were extended from baseline to month 12 by 26.9 (19.7, 34.0) days (p < 0.0001), and eyes with pre-switch injection intervals < 8 weeks were able to have their injection intervals extended by 23.6 days longer than eyes with pre-switch injection intervals ≥ 8 weeks. At 18 months, injection intervals were extended by 36.3 (25.6, 46.9) days (p < 0.0001) compared to baseline. Following switch to brolucizumab, CMT was reduced at both 12 and 18 months (12 months: - 35.2 (- 51.7, - 18.8) µm, p < 0.0001; 18 months: - 38.9 (- 54.3, - 22.0) µm, p < 0.0001). Intraocular inflammation-related adverse events were reported in 4.6% of brolucizumab-treated eyes. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study demonstrates that injection intervals may be significantly extended with maintained vision and reduced CMT in nAMD eyes switching to brolucizumab therapy from other anti-VEGFs.

When Is Patient Behavior Indicative of Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) Vs Reasonable Response to Digestive Disease?

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Dietary modification is common in patients with digestive diseases to improve symptoms; however, food avoidance can become problematic. Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) is characterized as failure to meet one's nutritional needs owing to sensory hypersensitivity, lack of interest in eating, or fear of aversive consequences from eating, and is associated with negative medical and psychosocial outcomes. This study characterizes ARFID behaviors in adults with achalasia, celiac sprue, eosinophilic esophagitis, and inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 289 adults aged 18 and older completed self-report measures evaluating use of dietary treatment, ARFID symptoms, and psychosocial outcomes. Primary analyses investigated the occurrence of ARFID in patients with achalasia, celiac, eosinophilic esophagitis, and inflammatory bowel disease. Secondary analyses explored the associations between ARFID symptoms and clinical and psychosocial outcomes. RESULTS: More than half (53.7%) of the total sample met the diagnostic criteria for ARFID based on the Nine-Item ARFID Screen (NIAS), with 78.4% of patients with achalasia meeting criteria. Patients on a physician-directed diet showed greater fear of gastrointestinal symptoms (P = .025), less interest in food (P = .046), and a higher total NIAS score (P = .045). For patients using dietary therapy, those who had met with a dietitian reported higher NIAS scores (P = .039). Food avoidance/restriction was associated with increased anxiety and depression, and diminished health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: It is likely that ARFID rates, as measured by the NIAS, are inflated in these 4 patient groups. These findings highlight the need for updated assessments of ARFID in patients with complex digestive diseases.

Giant axonal neuropathy: cross-sectional analysis of a large natural history cohort.

Giant axonal neuropathy (GAN) is an ultra-rare autosomal recessive, progressive neurodegenerative disease with early childhood onset that presents as a prominent sensorimotor neuropathy and commonly progresses to affect both the PNS and CNS. The disease is caused by biallelic mutations in the GAN gene located on 16q23.2, leading to loss of functional gigaxonin, a substrate specific ubiquitin ligase adapter protein necessary for the regulation of intermediate filament turnover. Here, we report on cross-sectional data from the first study visit of a prospectively collected natural history study of 45 individuals, age range 3-21 years with genetically confirmed GAN to describe and cross-correlate baseline clinical and functional cohort characteristics. We review causative variants distributed throughout the GAN gene in this cohort and identify a recurrent founder mutation in individuals with GAN of Mexican descent as well as cases of recurrent uniparental isodisomy. Through cross-correlational analysis of measures of strength, motor function and electrophysiological markers of disease severity, we identified the Motor Function Measure 32 to have the strongest correlation across measures and age in individuals with GAN. We analysed the Motor Function Measure 32 scores as they correspond to age and ambulatory status. Importantly, we identified and characterized a subcohort of individuals with a milder form of GAN and with a presentation similar to Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Such a clinical presentation is distinct from the classic presentation of GAN, and we demonstrate how the two groups diverge in performance on the Motor Function Measure 32 and other functional motor scales. We further present data on the first systematic clinical analysis of autonomic impairment in GAN as performed on a subset of the natural history cohort. Our cohort of individuals with genetically confirmed GAN is the largest reported to date and highlights the clinical heterogeneity and the unique phenotypic and functional characteristics of GAN in relation to disease state. The present work is designed to serve as a foundation for a prospective natural history study and functions in concert with the ongoing gene therapy trial for children with GAN.

Association of Initial Maximal Motor Ability With Long-term Functional Outcome in Patients With COL6-Related Dystrophies.

OBJECTIVE: To accurately categorize the phenotypes of individuals with collagen VI-related dystrophies (COL6-RDs) during the first years of life to predict long-term motor function and pulmonary function, to provide phenotype-specific anticipatory care, and to improve clinical trial readiness. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter, international study analyzed the relationship of long-term motor and pulmonary function with the initial maximal motor ability achieved in individuals with COL6-RD. RESULTS: We studied 119 patients with COL6-RD from Spain (n = 54) and the United States (n = 65). The early maximal motor milestones of ability to rise from the floor unassisted and ability to climb 4 steps without holding onto a railing demonstrated reliability in distinguishing between 3 COL6-RD phenotypic subgroups: (1) Ullrich congenital muscular dystrophy, (2) intermediate COL6-RD, and (3) Bethlem myopathy. Long-term motor function and pulmonary function are strongly correlated with the maximal motor ability achieved during the first years of life. Maximal motor capacity can predict other disease-relevant events such as the age at loss of ambulation and the need for the initiation of nocturnal noninvasive ventilation. CONCLUSION: This work proposes a prospective phenotypic classification for COL6-RDs that will enable an accurate prediction of a patient's COL6-RD phenotype during the first years of life. The ability to establish a patient's COL6-RD phenotypic classification early will enable a more accurate prognosis of future motor and pulmonary function, thus improving anticipatory clinical care, and it will be instrumental in aiding the design of future clinical trials by allowing early stratification of trial cohorts.

Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Motor Function Measure in Collagen VI-Related Dystrophies and Laminin Alpha2-Related Muscular Dystrophy.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the responsiveness of the motor function measure (MFM) and determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in individuals with 2 common types of congenital muscular dystrophy (CMD). DESIGN: Observational, prospective, single center, cohort study. SETTING: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=44) with collagen VI-related dystrophies (COL6-RD, n=23) and 21 individuals laminin alpha2-related muscular dystrophy (LAMA2-RD, n=21) enrolled in a 4-year longitudinal natural history study. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Responsiveness of the MFM-32 and the Rasch-scaled MFM-25 and the MCID of the MFM-32 determined from a patient-reported anchor with 2 different methods, within-patient and between-patient. RESULTS: The original MFM-32 and Rasch-scaled MFM-25 performed similarly overall in both the COL6-RD and LAMA2-RD populations, with all subscores (D1, standing and transfers; D2, axial and proximal; D3, distal) showing a significant decrease over time, except MFM D1 and D3 for LAMA2-RD. The MFM D1 subscore was the most sensitive to change for ambulant individuals, whereas the MFM D2 subscore was the most sensitive to change for nonambulant individuals. The MCID for the MFM-32 total score was calculated as 2.5 and 3.9 percentage points according to 2 different methods. CONCLUSIONS: The MFM showed strong responsiveness in individuals with LAMA2-RD and COL6-RD. Because a floor effect was identified more prominently with the Rasch-Scaled MFM-25, the use of the original MFM-32 as a quantitative variable with the assumption of scale linearity appears to be a good compromise. When designing clinical trials in congenital muscular dystrophies, the use of MCID for MFM should be considered to determine if a given intervention effects show not only a statistically significant change but also a clinically meaningful change.