ABSTRACT
The oxidative base lesion 8-oxo-deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dG) has been identified in DNA isolated from normal tissue and may occur at elevated levels during disease. However, the use of phenol during DNA extraction may artificially elevate the detected levels of this lesion. Herein, we have performed a comparative methodological study using both pronase E and phenol extraction techniques; native or oxidatively stressed DNA was isolated to determine the validity of each extraction technique for the subsequent determination of 8-oxo-dG. Whilst the yields of DNA were comparable, after pronase E extraction there was no detectable induction of 8-oxo-dG in reextracted naked DNA or peripheral blood mononuclear cell DNA that had been oxidatively stressed. However, phenol extraction enhanced the basal levels of 8-oxo-dG detected, and also induced a significant increase in levels of the modified base after exposure to oxidative stress. The latter was dependent on the presence of foetal calf serum in the extracellular medium. We have confirmed that phenol extraction sensitises native DNA to subsequent oxidative damage. In addition, this work shows that the extent of sensitisation occurring during phenol extraction varies with the degree of oxidative damage already incurred and infers that labile guanine sites generated during oxidative stress may be detected as 8-oxo-dG residues after phenol extraction.
Subject(s)
DNA/isolation & purification , Oxidative Stress , 8-Hydroxy-2'-Deoxyguanosine , Animals , Cattle , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , DNA/metabolism , Deoxyguanosine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxyguanosine/analysis , Deoxyguanosine/metabolism , Gamma Rays , Hydrogen Peroxide/pharmacology , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/metabolism , Phenol , Phenols/pharmacology , Pronase/metabolism , Thymus Gland/chemistryABSTRACT
The chromatographic quantitation of 8-oxoguanine adducts in DNA is widespread in the literature, although results obtained by HPLC of 8-oxodeoxyguanosine do not always agree with levels determined by GC-MS. To help explain this discrepancy, here we describe a novel procedure for the analysis of 8-oxoguanine adducts in DNA. Although it proved difficult to directly quantitate 8-oxoguanine in the presence of high levels of endogenous guanine using conventional reversed-phase HPLC, a simple preincubation of DNA acid hydrolysates with guanase allowed such analyses. The assay relied on our observation that 8-oxoguanine was not a substrate for guanase, and on sensitive electrochemical detection. The limit of detection for 8-oxoguanine was 5 nM or 250 fmol on column. Using this procedure, the background level of 8-oxoguanine in commercially available calf thymus DNA was 0.4 nmol/mg DNA or 3.2 mol/10(5) mol guanine.
