Agouti-related protein-like immunoreactivity: characterization of release from hypothalamic tissue and presence in serum.

A novel RIA was used to examine the release of agouti-related protein-like immunoreactivity (AGRP-LI) from perfused rat hypothalamic tissue slices and to characterize AGRP-LI in rat serum. A continuous low level basal AGRP-LI release was observed from hypothalami of rats fed ad libitum before the rats were killed. Basal AGRP-LI release was 3-fold greater in rats fasted 48 h. In fasted animals leptin dose-dependently suppressed basal AGRP-LI release. In fed animals no change in basal AGRP-LI release was detected in response to 10(-6) M alpha-MSH, orexin B, melanin-concentrating hormone, or serotonin. HPLC analysis of AGRP-LI in rat serum identified a single peak that eluted in close proximity to synthetic AGRP (87-132) and mouse [Leu127Pro]AGRP and that was identical to the peak seen in hypothalamic and adrenal tissue extracts. The serum concentration of AGRP-LI in rats fed ad libitum was 0.865+/-0.323 nmol/liter (mean +/- SE). Food deprivation resulted in a slow, but statistically significant rise in serum immunoreactivity at 48 h [1.174+/-0.118 nmol/liter (mean +/- SE)]. Bilateral adrenalectomy did not change serum levels of AGRP-LI. These studies demonstrate that in the rat there are different levels of basal hypothalamic AGRP-LI release in fed and fasted states and that in the fasted rat this release can be profoundly suppressed by leptin. These studies also suggest that AGRP is present in the systemic circulation of rats.

Diminished prohormone convertase 3 expression (PC1/PC3) inhibits progastrin post-translational processing.

Gastrin is initially synthesized as a large precursor that requires endoproteolytic cleavage by a prohormone convertase (PC) for bioactivation. Gastric antral G-cells process progastrin at Arg(94)Arg(95) and Lys(74)Lys(75) residues generating gastrin heptadecapeptide (G17-NH(2)). Conversely, duodenal G-cells process progastrin to gastrin tetratriacontapeptide (G34-NH(2)) with little processing at Lys(74)Lys(75). Both tissues express PC1/PC3 and PC2. Previously, we demonstrated that heterologous expression of progastrin in an endocrine cell line that expresses PC1/PC3 and little PC2 (AtT-20) resulted in the formation of G34-NH(2). To confirm that PC1/PC3 was responsible for progastrin processing in AtT-20 cells and capable of processing progastrin in vivo we coexpressed either human wild-type (Lys(74)Lys(75)) or mutant (Arg(74)Arg(75), Lys(74)Arg(75), and Arg(74)Lys(75)) progastrins in AtT-20 cells with two different antisense PC1/PC3 constructs. Coexpression of either antisense construct resulted in a consistent decrease in G34-NH(2) formation. Gastrin mRNA expression and progastrin synthesis were equivalent in each cell line. Although mutation of the Lys(74)Lys(75) site within G34-NH(2) to Lys(74)Arg(75) resulted in the production of primarily G17-NH(2) rather than G34-NH(2), inhibition of PC1/PC3 did not significantly inhibit processing at the Lys(74)Arg(75) site. We conclude that PC1/PC3 is a progastrin processing enzyme, suggesting a role for PC1/PC3 progastrin processing in G-cells.

Somatostatin gene transfer and expression in endothelial cells.

PURPOSE: The antiproliferative and antisecretory effects of somatostatin have many potential uses in the clinical setting. Retroviral gene transfer of somatostatin to endothelium is a potential means of local delivery of this peptide to specific vascular beds. This investigation was designed to determine whether transduced endothelial cells (ECs) could produce and post-translationally process somatostatin. METHODS: Cultured canine venous, rat aortic, and rat microvascular ECs were transfected with retroviruses containing a human somatostatin cDNA or a control beta-galactosidase gene. Total and isoform somatostatin production and uniformity of beta-galactosidase expression were analyzed, as were the effects of somatostatin production on EC proliferation. RESULTS: Somatostatin-transduced canine venous ECs, but not rat ECs, produced approximately 10 times as much total somatostatin as did control-transfected ECs (450 +/- 32 vs 49 +/- 10 pmol/L, p < 0.05). The predominant isoform of somatostatin produced was somatostatin-14. Production of somatostatin was stable with passage and did not impair the growth of canine ECs. The failure of rat ECs to produce somatostatin correlated with nonuniform expression of beta-galactosidase, suggesting that promoter silencing was responsible for failure of transgene expression. CONCLUSION: Retroviral gene transfer of somatostatin to canine ECs results in the production of physiologically relevant concentrations of biologically active somatostatin. Significant species differences exist in EC production of somatostatin, with promoter silencing being a potential mechanism of failure of gene expression. Gene therapy strategies using retroviral transfer of somatostatin to ECs may allow somatostatin delivery to focal areas of the vasculature.

Canine prosomatostatin: isolation of a cDNA, regulation of gene expression, and characterization of post-translational processing intermediates.

Somatostatin is a tetradecapeptide (SS-14) initially isolated from the hypothalamus that is also found in D cells of the stomach and pancreas where it exerts an inhibitory action on a variety of gastrointestinal functions. Since many of concepts important to an understanding of gastrointestinal physiology are derived from experiments in the dog we examined somatostatin gene expression and post-translational processing in the canine fundus, antrum and pancreas. The canine somatostatin cDNA which is highly homologous to other known mammalian somatostatins was used to examine somatostatin expression in isolated canine fundic D-cells. Somatostatin expression induced by cholecystokinin (10(-8) M) was inhibited by the somatostatin analog, octreotide (10(-7) M). To examine somatostatin processing in the canine gut we noted that synthesis of SS-14 and somatostatin octacosapeptide (SS-28) involves endoproteolytic cleavage of prosomatostatin (proSS) at both paired and single basic amino-acid residues, respectively. Antisera capable of recognizing the amino-terminal residues of SS-28, SS-28(1-14) and SS-28(1-12) were characterized and identified concentrations of SS-28(1-12) but not SS-28(1-14) in the fundus, antrum and pancreas equivalent to those of SS-14. Since previous biosynthetic studies in canine fundic D-cells showed that SS-14 was synthesized without the appearance of a SS-28 intermediate, we hypothesize that proSS is sequentially cleaved at a dibasic site to produce SS-14 followed by monobasic cleavage that results in the formation of SS-28(1-12). Furthermore, equivalent amounts of SS-14 and SS-28(1-12) were co-released from canine fundic D-cells by CCK (10(-8) M) suggesting that the generation of these products occurs within the same regulated pathway of secretion.

Specificity of prohormone convertase endoproteolysis of progastrin in AtT-20 cells.

Biologically active peptide hormones are synthesized from larger precursor proteins by a variety of posttranslational processing reactions. Endoproteolytic cleavage at the Lys74-Lys75 dibasic processing site of progastrin is the major determinant for the relative distribution of gastrin heptadecapeptide and tetratriacontapeptide in tissues. Thus, we explored the ability of two prohormone convertases, PC1/PC3 and PC2, to cleave this important site within progastrin. We expressed wild-type human gastrin cDNA and mutant cDNAs in which the Lys74Lys75 site was changed to Lys74Arg75, Arg74Arg75, and Arg74Lys75 residues in AtT-20 cells. Because AtT-20 cells express Pc1/PC3 but not PC2, we also coexpressed a cDNA encoding PC2 in both wild-type and mutant gastrin-producing AtT-20 cells. Wild-type Lys74Lys75 and mutant Arg74Arg75 progastrin processing sites were efficiently cleaved in AtT-20 cells only after coexpression of PC2. Mutant Lys74Arg75 progastrin was readily processed in cells in the presence or absence of PC2 coexpression, but, in contrast, mutant Arg74Lys75 progastrin was inefficiently cleaved regardless of PC2 coexpression. Northern analysis revealed the presence of PC2 but not PC1/ PC3 in canine antral gastrin-producing G cells. These data suggest that PC2 but not PC1/PC3 is responsible for the cleavage of the Lys74Lys75 site in wild-type progastrin.

Substrate specificity of the gastrin-amidating enzyme.

As is the case with many other peptide hormones of the brain and gut, gastrin requires a carboxyl-terminal amide moiety for optimal biological activity. In the structure of progastrin, the carboxyl-terminal Phe of gastrin is followed by the sequence Gly93-Arg94-Arg95, which must be processed sequentially by an endoprotease, a carboxypeptidase, and an amidating enzyme to produce amidated bioactive gastrin. To examine the molecular determinants of peptide amidation in vivo, we mutated the wild-type Gly93 residue of progastrin to Ala93 and Ser93 and expressed the three progastrin DNAs in GH3 and MTC 6-23 endocrine cell lines. Although substantial quantities of amidated gastrin were seen in cells expressing wild-type progastrin, replacement of Gly93 with Ala93 completely abolished production of amidated gastrin when the cells were incubated in standard medium containing only L-alanine. In a similar fashion, cells expressing [Ser93]progastrin also demonstrated no production of amidated gastrin. When cells expressing [Ala93]- or [Ser93]progastrin were incubated in the presence of 1 mg/ml D-alanine or D-serine, respectively, a small but consistent amount of amidated gastrin production was detected (< 1% of wild type). These data lead us to conclude that the amidating enzyme has a rigid substrate specificity for a glycine-extended precursor. Furthermore, this in vivo substrate specificity confirms the importance of the pro-S-alpha-hydrogen of the carboxyl-terminal glycine for enzyme-substrate recognition.