ABSTRACT
Understanding the role of biomacromolecules and their interactions with pollutants is a key for elucidating the sorption mechanisms and making an accurate assessment of the environmental fate of pollutants. The knowledge of the sorption properties of the different constituents of these biomacromolecules may furnish a significant contribution to this purpose. Suberin is a very abundant biopolymer in higher plants. In this study, suberin monomers isolated from cork were analyzed by thermally-assisted methylation with tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) in a pyrolysis unit coupled to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS). The isolated monomer mixture was used to study the sorption of three pesticides (isoproturon, methomyl and oxamyl). The modes of pesticide-sorbent interactions were analyzed by means of two modeling calculations, the first one representing only the mixture of suberin monomers used in the sorption study, and the second one including glycerol to the mixture of suberin monomers, as a building block of the suberin molecule. The results indicated that the highest sorption capacity exhibited by the sorbent was for isoproturon (33%) being methomyl and oxamyl sorbed by the main suberin components to a lesser extent (3% and<1%, respectively). In addition to van der Waals interactions with the apolar region of sorbent and isoproturon, modeling calculations evidenced the formation of a hydrogen bond between the isoproturon NH group and a carboxylic oxygen atom of a suberin monomer. In the case of methomyl and oxamyl only weak van der Waals interactions stabilize the pesticide-sorbent adducts. The presence of glycerol in the model provoked significant changes in the interactions with isoproturon and methomyl.
Subject(s)
Lipids/chemistry , Models, Chemical , Pesticides/chemistry , Gas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryABSTRACT
The role of chemical components of cork in the sorption of several pesticides has been investigated. For this purpose raw cork and three cork extracted fractions (i.e. cork free of aliphatic extractives, cork free of all extractives and cork free of all extractives and suberin) were used as sorbent of three ionic pesticides (propazine, 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D) and alachlor) and five non-ionic pesticides (chlorpyrifos, isoproturon, metamitron, methomyl and oxamyl) with a logKow within the range -0.47 to 4.92. The effect of cations on the ionic pesticides, propazine and 2,4-D sorption was also analyzed. Results indicated that the highest yields were obtained for chlorpyrifos and alachlor sorption onto raw cork (>55%). After removal of aliphatic extractives sorption of all pesticides increased that ranged from 3% for propazine to 31% for alachlor. In contrast, removal of phenolic extractives caused a sorption decrease. Low sorption yields were obtained for hydrophobic pesticides such as metamitron, oxamyl and methomyl (<11%) by using all cork fractions and extremely low when using raw cork (<1%). FTIR analysis was useful to indicate that lignin moieties were the main components involved on the sorption process. Modelling calculations evidenced that π-stacking interactions with the aromatic groups of lignin play a major role in determining the adsorption properties of cork toward aromatic pesticides. Results presented in this paper gain insights into the cork affinities for pesticides and the interactions involved in the sorption process and also enables to envisage sorption affinity of cork for other organic pollutants.
Subject(s)
Lignin/chemistry , Models, Molecular , Pesticides/chemistry , Plant Bark/chemistry , Quercus , 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid , Acetamides , Adsorption , Chlorpyrifos , Hydrogen Bonding , Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions , Lipids/chemistry , Molecular Structure , Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared , TriazinesABSTRACT
Debido al amplio número de publicaciones que existen sobre Implantología Bucofacial, resulta difícil para el odontólogo seleccionar y leer de forma crítica una cantidad suficiente de artículos que puedan aportarle una información útil para su praxis diaria. En este artículo pretendemos sintetizar la información más relevante que se encuentra en las revistas indexadas de la especialidad publicadas el año 2009 (AU)
The lack of the available time of the professionals involved in the Odontologic field and the difficulty to achieve a good level of information about Oral Implantology, arise the interest of the authors to expose a synthetic review of the publications. This article tries to summarize the most relevant information found in the journals of the specialty published in 2009 (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Dental Implants , /methods , Dental Implantation/methods , Cell Engineering , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/adverse effects , Osteogenesis, DistractionABSTRACT
Debido al amplio número de publicaciones que existen sobre Implantología Bucofacial, resulta difícil para el odontólogo seleccionar y leer de forma crítica una cantidad suficiente de artículos que puedan aportarle una información útil para su praxis diaria. En este artículo se pretende sintetizarla información más relevante que se encuentra en las revistas indexadas de la especialidad publicadas durante el año 2009 (AU)
The lack of the available time of the professionals involved in the odontologic field and the difficulty to achieve a good level of information about Oral Implantology, arise the interest of the authors to expose a synthetic review of the publications. This article tries to summarize the most relevant information found in the journals of the specialty published in 2009 (AU)
