Emergency operation for acute type A aortic dissection: neurologic complications and early mortality.

BACKGROUND: Acute type A aortic dissection is a surgical emergency still associated with high postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to investigate factors for hospital mortality and neurologic deficit in patients undergoing emergency operation for acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS: Eighty-five consecutive patients (age range, 20 to 82 years) operated on for acute type A aortic dissection over a 6-year period were evaluated. Univariate and stepwise multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted among 32 perioperative variables. RESULTS: All patients underwent surgical procedures under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Antegrade or retrograde cerebral perfusion was used in 23 patients (27.1%) and 18 patients (21.2%), respectively. Forty-three patients underwent arch/hemiarch replacement and the ascending aorta was replaced in 42 patients. Overall mortality rate was 25.9% (22 of 85 patients). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that lack of cerebral perfusion (p = 0.021) and postoperative renal failure (p = 0.006) were the best predictors for hospital death. Twenty-one patients (24.7%) experienced neurologic accidents. The risk factor for postoperative neurologic complication was lack of cerebral perfusion (p = 0.013). Hospital mortality was 13% (3 of 23 patients) and 16.7% (3 of 18 patients) in the antegrade and retrograde cerebral perfusion groups (p > 0.05) and neurologic deficit was 13% (3 of 23 patients) and 11.1% (2 of 18 patients), respectively (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Hospital mortality and neurologic complications in patients undergoing emergent operation for acute type A aortic dissection were reduced when cerebral perfusion was used with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.

The double-orifice technique as a standardized approach to treat mitral regurgitation due to severe myxomatous disease: surgical technique.

OBJECTIVES: Mitral-valve repair in Barlow's disease is challenging; conventional techniques are difficult to perform, and there is a high risk of a postoperative suboptimal result. Double-orifice repair has been applied in a standardized approach to treat patients with severe mitral regurgitation and bileaflet prolapse due to Barlow's disease. METHODS: Since 1993, 82 patients with severe mitral regurgitation due to Barlow's disease underwent correction applying the edge-to-edge concept. They were submitted to double-orifice repair in a standardized fashion, suturing the middle portions of both leaflets. RESULTS: There were no hospital deaths. The repair was unsatisfactory in one patient who underwent valve replacement soon after the repair. The mean postoperative valve area was 3.7+/-0.79 cm(2) against a mean preoperative value of 9.2+/-2.1 cm(2). No or mild regurgitation was found in all but three patients who showed moderate residual regurgitation. There were no late deaths. Freedom from reoperation was 86+/-14% at 5 years. At the latest follow-up, all patient but one were New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I, and echo-Doppler assessment of valve reconstruction showed stable valve function in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The double-orifice repair can be used as a standardized approach to treat valve regurgitation due to Barlow disease with low risk and good early and mid-term results.

Cardiac papillary fibroelastoma: report of two cases.

We report 2 cases of cardiac papillary fibroelastoma in aortic position that were successfully treated by complete surgical excision, without damage to the aortic valve. This rare cardiac tumor can be associated with serious embolic or hemodynamic complications and therefore, prompt surgical intervention is required.

Ultrasound echo-enhancers in the evaluation of endovascular prostheses.

Whereas conventional vascular surgical procedures are routinely monitored by ultrasound imaging, endovascular prostheses are usually monitored by radiographical imaging techniques. The aim of this study was to determine the safety, patient acceptance and role of ultrasound echo-enhancers (SHU 508 A) in the evaluation of endovascular devices. Nine patients were studied: six had stents (four in the internal carotid artery and two in the renal artery) and three had endoluminal prostheses (one in the abdominal aorta, one in the subclavian and one in the iliac artery). Endovascular patency and correct placement were studied with contrast angiography and ultrasound examination with and without contrast enhancement. Patients underwent angiography at the end of the endovascular procedure, and ultrasound examinations on the first postoperative day. Ultrasound contrast media (SHU 508 A) was injected through an antecubital vein at a rate of 1 ml/s. A total of 13 injections were given in nine patients. Ultrasonograms were obtained with 7.5 and 3.5 MHz transducers (Acuson 128 XP) and recorded on videotape for off-line visual inspection. Baseline and echo-enhanced sequences were assessed by two independent observers. None of the patients reported side-effects during or after the injection of the ultrasound echo-enhancer. Postoperative angiography showed endovascular patency and correct placement in all patients. The baseline ultrasound examination confirmed endoprosthesis patency in seven of nine patients: none revealed endoprosthesis malplacement. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination confirmed endoprosthesis patency. In two cases, the echo-contrast examination revealed persisting flow within the aneurysmal sac: in another patient it showed the incomplete adhesion of the distal portion of the endoprosthesis to the arterial wall. The preliminary findings suggest that ultrasound echo-enhancers are safe to use and induce no side-effects. Echo-enhanced sequences often provide additional information on the technical success of endovascular procedures. They promise to be useful in follow-up studies for assessing the functioning of endoprostheses.

Locoregional versus general anesthesia in carotid surgery: is there an impact on perioperative myocardial ischemia? Results of a prospective monocentric randomized trial.

PURPOSE: The incidence of cardiac morbidity and mortality in patients who undergo carotid surgery ranges from 0.7% to 7.1%, but it still represents almost 50% of all perioperative complications. Because no data are available in literature about the impact of the anesthetic technique on such complications, a prospective randomized monocentric study was undertaken to evaluate the role of local anesthesia (LA) and general anesthesia (GA) on cardiac outcome. METHODS: From November 1995 to February 1998, 107 patients were classified by the cardiologist as cardiac patients (IHD; history of myocardial infarction, previous myocardial revascularization procedures, or myocardial ischemia documented by means of positive electrocardiogram [ECG] stress test results) or noncardiac patients (NIHD; no history of chest pain or negative results for an ECG stress test). The patients were operated on after the randomization for the type of anesthesia (general or local). Continuous computerized 12-lead ECG was performed during the operative procedure and 24 hours postoperatively. The end points of the study were ECG modifications (upsloping or downsloping more than 2 mm) of the sinus tachycardia (ST) segment. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were classified as IHD, and 52 were classified as NIHD. Twenty-seven of the 55 IHD patients (49%) and 24 of 52 NIHD patients (46%) were operated on under GA. Thirty-six episodes of myocardial ischemia occurred in 22 patients (20.5%). Episodes were slightly more frequent (58%) and longer in the postoperative period (intraoperative, 10 +/- 5 min; postoperative, 60 +/- 45 min; P <. 001). As expected, the prevalence of myocardial ischemia was higher in the group of cardiac patients than in noncardiac group (15 of 55 patients [27%] vs 7 of 52 patients [13%]; P <.02). By comparing the two anesthetic techniques in the overall population, we found a similar prevalence of patients who had myocardial ischemia (GA, 12 of 52 [23%]; LA, 10 of 55 [18%]; P = not significant) and a similar number of ischemic episodes per patient (GA, 1.5 +/- 0.4; LA, 1.8 +/- 0.6; P = not significant). Episodes of myocardial ischemia were similarly distributed in intraoperative and postoperative periods in both groups. It is relevant that under GA, IHD patients represent most of the population who suffered myocardial ischemia (83%). On the contrary, in the group of patients operated on under LA, the prevalence was equally distributed in the two subpopulations. CONCLUSION: The results confirm the different hemodynamic impact of the two anesthetic techniques. Patients who received LA had a rate of myocardial ischemia that was half that of patients who had GA. The small number of cardiac complications do not permit us to make any definitive conclusion on the impact of the two anesthetic techniques on early cardiac morbidity, but the relationship between perioperative ischemic burden and major cardiac events suggests that LA can be used safely, even in high-risk patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

General anaesthesia versus cervical block and perioperative complications in carotid artery surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare the influence of anaesthetic technique on perioperative complications in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a retrospective study of 1020 consecutive patients who underwent carotid artery surgery over 10 years, perioperative neurologic and cardiologic complications and the use of an internal carotid artery shunt were compared in 337 patients (33%) treated under general anaesthesia and 683 (67%) under cervical block. The two groups had similar characteristics. The most frequent surgical indication was symptomatic carotid artery disease (91.5%). The remaining patients had asymptomatic severe internal carotid lesions (> 70%). RESULTS: The overall perioperative stroke rate was 1.9%, the death-stroke rate 0.7% and the cardiac complication rate 0.8%. The perioperative stroke rate was higher in the general anaesthesia group than in the cervical block group (3.2% vs 1.3%, p = 0.01). Cardiac complication rates were similar in the two groups. A carotid artery shunt was used in 75 patients (22%) receiving general anaesthesia and in 92 patients (13%) receiving cervical block (p = 0.0004). The causes of stroke in the cervical block group were intraoperative embolism (4 cases, 26%), perioperative thromboembolism (7 cases, 58%) and clamping ischaemia (1 case, 16%). Mechanisms causing stroke in the general anaesthesia group remained unidentified or uncertain. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical block anaesthesia yields better perioperative results than general anaesthesia probably because it allows more reliable cerebral monitoring, reducing or even eliminating perioperative strokes related to clamping ischaemia. It facilitates detection of the mechanism underlying intraoperative stroke allowing surgical techniques and intraoperative management to be modified accordingly. Cervical block anaesthesia significantly reduces the need for internal carotid artery shunting.