Rates and risk factors for persistent opioid use after cardiothoracic surgery: A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: This study's aim was to estimate potential risk factors for persistent opioid use after cardiothoracic surgery. METHODS: This study included participants in the McGill University Health Centre clinical trial (2014 to 2016). Provincial medical services, prescription claims, and medical charts data were linked. Persistent opioid use was defined as an initial peri-operative opioid dispensation followed by an opioid dispensation between 91 and 180 days postdischarge. Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards models were used to assess factors associated with persistent opioid use. RESULTS: A cohort of 815 patients (mean age: 68.9 [standard deviation = 8.9]) was assembled, of which 8.2% became persistent opioid users. Factors such as higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-10.6), history of diabetes (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.3-3.4), substance and alcohol abuse (adjusted hazard ratio: 16.3, 95% confidence interval: 5.3-49.5), and radiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.5-4.1) were associated with a higher hazard of persistent opioid use. Previous opioid use (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.0-2.8), daily peri-operative opioid dose (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.5-3.7), having an opioid dispensation 30 days pre-admission (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.0-2.8), and pre-admission analgesic use (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.0-2.8), were also associated with an increased hazard of persistent use. Being prescribed multimodal analgesia at discharge (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.92) was associated with a 46% decreased hazard of developing persistent opioid use. CONCLUSION: Multiple patient- and medication-related characteristics were associated with an increased hazard of persistent opioid use.

Development of a Frailty Ladder Using Rasch Analysis: If the Shoe Fits.

Background: The current measurement approach to frailty is to create an index of frailty status, rather than measure it. The purpose of this study is to test the extent to which a set of items identified within the frailty concept fit a hierarchical linear model (e.g., Rasch model) and form a true measure reflective of the frailty construct. Methods: A sample was assembled from three sources: community organization for at-risk seniors (n=141); colorectal surgery group assessed post-surgery (n=47); and hip fracture assessed post-rehabilitation (n=46). The 234 individuals (age 57 to 97) contributed 348 measurements. The frailty construct was defined according to the named domains within commonly used frailty indices, and items drawn to reflect the frailty came from self-report measures. Performance tests were tested for the extent to which they fit the Rasch model. Results: Of the 68 items, 29 fit the Rasch model: 19 self-report items on physical function and 10 performance tests, including one for cognition; patient reports of pain, fatigue, mood, and health did not fit; nor did body mass index (BMI) nor any item representing participation. Conclusion: Items that are typically identified as reflecting the frailty concept fit the Rasch model. The Frailty Ladder would be an efficient and statistically robust way of combining results of different tests into one outcome measure. It would also be a way of identifying which outcomes to target in a personalized intervention. The rungs of the ladder, the hierarchy, could be used to guide treatment goals.

Development of a conceptual framework of recovery after abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with robust measurement properties to assess postoperative recovery and support patient-centered care after abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to establish a conceptual framework of recovery after abdominal surgery to support the development of a conceptually relevant and psychometrically sound PROM. METHODS: Patients from four different countries (Canada, Italy, Brazil, and Japan) participated in qualitative interviews focusing on their lived experiences of recovery after abdominal surgery. Interviews were guided by a previously developed hypothesized conceptual framework established based on a literature review and expert consensus. Interviews were analyzed according to a modified grounded theory approach and transcripts were coded according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Codes for which thematic saturation was reached were classified into domains of health that are relevant to the process of recovery after abdominal surgery. These domains were organized into a structured diagram. RESULTS: 30 Patients with diverse demographics and surgical characteristics were interviewed (50% female, age 57 ± 18 years, 66% major or major extended surgery). 39 Unique domains of recovery emerged from the interviews, 17 falling under the ICF category of "Body Functions" and 22 under "Activities and Participation". These domains constitute the conceptual framework of recovery after abdominal surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides comprehensive insight into patients' perspectives of the recovery process after abdominal surgery. This conceptual framework will support content validity and provide the pivotal basis for the development of a novel PROM to inform quality improvement initiatives and patient-centered research in abdominal surgery.

Ensuring Early Mobilization Within an Enhanced Recovery Program for Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the extent to which the addition of staff-directed facilitation of early mobilization to an Enhanced Recovery Program (ERP) impacts recovery after colorectal surgery, compared with usual care. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Early mobilization is considered an important component of ERPs but, despite guidelines recommendations, adherence remains quite low. The value of dedicating specific resources (eg, staff time) to increase early mobilization is unknown. METHODS: This randomized trial involved 99 colorectal surgery patients in an established ERP (median age 63, 57% male, 80% laparoscopic) randomized 1:1 to usual care (including preoperative education about early mobilization with postoperative daily targets) or facilitated mobilization [staff dedicated to assist transfers and walking from postoperative days (PODs) 0-3]. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients returning to preoperative functional walking capacity (6-min walk test) at 4 weeks after surgery. We also explored the association of the intervention with in-hospital mobilization, time to achieve discharge criteria, time to recover gastrointestinal function, 30-day comprehensive complication index, and patient-reported outcome measures. RESULTS: In the facilitated mobilization group, adherence to mobilization targets was greater on POD0 [OR 4.7 (95% CI 1.8-11.9)], POD1 [OR 6.5 (95% CI 2.3-18.3)], and POD2 [OR 3.7 (95% CI 1.2-11.3)]. Step count was at least 2-fold greater on POD1 [mean difference 843.3 steps (95% CI 219.5-1467.1)] and POD2 [mean difference 1099.4 steps (95% CI 282.7-1916.1)] There was no between-group difference in recovery of walking capacity at 4 weeks after surgery [OR 0.77 (95% CI 0.30-1.97)]. Other outcome measures were also not different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In an ERP for colorectal surgery, staff-directed facilitation of early mobilization increased out-of-bed activities during hospital stay but did not improve outcomes. This study does not support the value of allocating additional resources to ensure early mobilization in ERPs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02131844.

Influence of pleural drainage on postoperative pain, vital capacity and six-minute walk test after pulmonary resection.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of pleural drainage on the distance covered on the six-minute walk test, pain intensity and vital capacity in patients submitted to pulmonary resection. METHODS: Thirteen consecutive patients from the Thoracic Surgery Infirmary of Hospital São Paulo, Brazil, submitted to closed pleural drainage (0.5-in multiperforated chest tube) in the postoperative period following pulmonary resection (lobectomy, segmentectomy and pulmonary nodule resection) were evaluated. The decision for chest tube removal followed clinical criteria defined by the surgical team, who did not participate in the study. Vital capacity, pain intensity (using a visual analog pain scale) and the distance covered on the six-minute walk test were determined 30 min prior to and 30 min after the removal of the chest tube. The statistical analysis was performed using paired t-tests, and the level of significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: After the removal of the chest tube, the visual analog scale pain scores were significantly lower (3.46 cm vs. 1.77 cm; p = 0.001) and the distance covered on the six-minute walk test was significantly higher (374.34 m vs. 444.62 m; p = 0.03). Vital capacity prior to and after chest tube removal was not significantly affected (2.15 L and 2.25 L, respectively; p = 0.540). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that the presence of a chest tube is a factor significantly associated with postoperative pain and functional limitation in patients submitted to pulmonary resection.