Intraoperative indocyanine green imaging as an adjunctive technique to reduce any circumflex artery damage during mitral valve surgery: a feasibility study.

Iatrogenic injuries to the circumflex coronary artery during mitral valve surgery are probably underestimated (reported rates of 0.3-1.8%). This complication arises from the artery's close proximity to the mitral annulus, particularly at the anterolateral commissure. The study aimed to assess this risk in a patient group prone to such injury. The surgical procedure utilized a minimally invasive approach and indocyanine green-based fluorescence imaging. This technique allows a real-time visualization of the circumflex artery, aiding precise placement of annular sutures and minimizing the risk of injury. The method, applied in 6 patients, integrates preoperative assessments with intraoperative fluorescence imaging, ensuring accurate arterial depiction and preventing iatrogenic damage. The study highlights the safety and efficacy of fluorescence imaging, especially in identifying vessel anomalies, indicating potential applications in various cardiac procedures.

Surgical Treatment of Active Endocarditis Pre- and Post-COVID-19 Pandemic Onset.

BACKGROUND: Despite advanced diagnosis and treatment, infective endocarditis (IE) is a potentially life-threatening condition. The impact of COVID-19 on the diagnosis and outcome of the surgical treatment of IE is uncertain. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of surgically treated IE before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 535 patients who underwent valve surgical procedures for IE between January 2010 and December 2022 in a single cardiac surgery center. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the date of their operation: before (n = 393) and after (n = 142) COVID-19 onset. In order to balance the groups, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) calculated from the propensity score (PS) was applied. Weighted univariate logistic regressions were reported for outcomes; weights were derived from IPTW. Interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) according to Linden's method was used to evaluate the changes in the manifestation of IE after 11 March 2020. RESULTS: Patients from the post-COVID-19 cohort (after 11 March 2020) had a greater number of comorbidities such as diabetes (29.6% vs. 16.3% p = 0.001), hypertension (71.1% vs. 59.5% p = 0.015), and preoperative kidney injury requiring dialysis (9.2% vs. 2.5% p = 0.002), but the median additive and logistic EuroSCORE were not statistically different. In the post-COVID-19 group, we observed a greater prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus-related endocarditis (24.5% vs. 15.4% p = 0.026), a consequent reduction in Staphylococcus non aureus-related endocarditis (12.2% vs. 20.1% p = 0.048), and a decrease in aortic valve replacements (43.0% vs. 53.9%), while the number of mitral valve replacements and repair was greater (21.1% vs. 15.0% and 6.3% vs. 4.3%, respectively). No differences were found in the two groups concerning early death, death, or relapse at 1 year after surgery. Data obtained by multivariable analysis identified preoperative renal dysfunction requiring dialysis as the only common risk factor for early mortality via stratifying by time periods in analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of surgically treated IE significantly increases after the COVID-19 pandemic with a higher incidence of mitral valve involvement with respect to the aortic valve. Although a delay in surgical timing occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, data in terms of mortality and outcomes were largely unaffected.

Less Is More? Combined Approaches to Improve Mortality and Morbidity after Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, one of the main goals of aortic valve surgery is to reduce the biological impact, mortality, and complications. It is well-known that long operative times in terms of the extracorporeal circulation, but above all, of the aortic cross-clamp time (ACC), represent a risk factor for mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. In order to shorten the aortic cross-clamp time, many technological improvements, such as sutureless prostheses, have been introduced, but their actual effectiveness has not been proven yet. The aim of this study was to assess the 30-day outcomes of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement surgery, focusing on the ACC length. METHODS: All 3139 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement between January 2013 and July 2022 at our institution were enrolled. The data were retrospectively collected and the baseline characteristics and intraoperative variables were recorded. In order to adjust the results according to the differences in the baseline characteristics, propensity score matching was performed and four groups of 351 patients were obtained based on the first, second, third, and fourth quartile of the ACC time. RESULTS: The patient population included 132 redo surgeries (9.4%) and 61 cases of active endocarditis (4.3%), with an overall median EuroSCORE II of 1.8 (IQR 1.2-3.1). An increase across the groups was observed in terms of the acute kidney failure (p < 0.001) incidence, the number of blood transfusions (p = 0.022), prolonged hospital stays (p < 0.001), the and respiratory failure (p < 0.001) incidence. A p of < 0.1 was found for the 30-day mortality (p = 0.079). The predictors of an early 30-day mortality were standard full sternotomy (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.14-5.40, p = 0.022), EuroSCORE II (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.16, p < 0.001), and a trend for a longer ACC time (Q4 vs. Q1: OR 2.62, 95% CI 0.89-7.68, p = 0.080). CONCLUSIONS: Shortening the operative times resulted in marked improvements of the patients' outcomes. The combined use of minimally invasive approaches and sutureless aortic valve prostheses allows for a lower 30-day events rate. New technologies should be assessed to obtain the best results with the least risk.

Effect of Preoperative Right Ventricular Dysfunction on Heart Transplantation Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: We investigated if the occurrence of preoperative right ventricular dysfunction is capable of influencing heart transplant results in terms of in-hospital mortality, incidence of primary graft dysfunction, and follow-up mortality. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 517 patients who underwent heart transplant between January 2000 and December 2020. We defined right ventricular dysfunction (RVD), as central venous pressure (CVP) > 15 mm Hg and CVP/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio > 0.63. We identified 2 subgroups in our population: 33 patients with preoperative RVD and 484 patients without RVD. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 7.9%. Severe early graft failure occurred in 6.6% of patients, with 26 patients (5.1%) needing intra-aortic balloon pump and 17 patients (3.3%) needing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Clinical variables that significantly influenced in-hospital mortality were age, peripheral artery disease, and bilirubin > 1.5 mg/dL, while hemodynamic variables influencing in-hospital mortality were CVP (odds ratio [OR], 1.09 [confidence interval {CI}, 1.03-1.15], P = .004], pulmonary artery systolic pressure (OR, 1.02 [CI, 1.00-1.04], P = .05), CVP/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio (OR, 2.78 [CI, 1.14-6.80], P = .025), pulmonary vascular resistance (OR, 1.15 [CI, 1.01-1.32], P = .042), transpulmonary gradient (TPG) (OR, 1.11 [CI, 1.03-1.18], P = .003) , diastolic transpulmonary gradient (OR, 1.10 [CI, 1.02-1.20], P = .015], together with right ventricular dysfunction (OR, 3.56 [CI, 1.44-8.80], P = .011). On the other hand, clinical variables influencing the incidence of early graft failure were body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) > 30, peripheral artery disease, bilirubin > 1.5 mg/dL, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score excluding international normalized ratio before transplant, and preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, while hemodynamic variables were pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (OR, 1.03 [CI, 1.00-1.05], P = .016), TPG (OR, 1.08 [1.01-1.17], P = .03), and right ventricular dysfunction (OR, 3.00 [CI, 1.07-8.40] P = .046). On the multivariable analysis, RVD and TPG were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality, while only TPG was a predictor of early graft failure. Follow-up mortality was 38.7% and was influenced by recipient age, recipient body mass index, and preoperative diabetes. Moreover, 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival of patients with preoperative RVD was significantly worse than patients without RVD (log-rank = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In our population, RVD influenced both in-hospital and long-term results after heart transplant. For these reasons, it appears crucially important to optimize preoperative right ventricular function to improve these patients' outcomes.

Endovascular treatment of penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers of the arch and thoracic aorta: In-hospital and 5-year outcomes.

Objective: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the treatment of choice for thoracic aorta diseases including penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU). The objective of this study was to analyze the results of TEVAR for the treatment of PAU in our population. Methods: From January 1999 to January 2019, 830 patients with type B aortic syndromes were treated with TEVAR in our institution. Of these we selected 73 patients treated for a PAU. Clinical and radiologic follow-up was performed in all patients. Results: Mean age of our population was 72 ± 8 years. Fifteen patients (20.5%) were treated in an emergency setting. The proximal landing zone was in arch zone 2 in 22 patients (30.1%). In-hospital mortality was 6.8% and was associated with acute presentation (P = .005). Distal arch delivery of the endograft was unrelated to mortality (Fisher exact test, P = .157). Survival at 1 and 5 years was 81.7% and 67.3%, respectively. Sixteen patients underwent reintervention of the thoracic aorta. Patients who underwent emergency surgery and older patients had a shorter survival (log rank test, P < .001). No difference in survival was shown according to the proximal landing zone (log rank P = .292) or the dimension of the thoracic aorta (log rank P = .067). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, only age older than 75 years was associated with 5-year mortality (hazard ratio, 6.60; 95% CI, 2.12-20.56); P < .001). Conclusions: The use of TEVAR for treatment of aortic PAU is a safe procedure in an elective setting despite necessity of arch stent grafting. An early intervention performed at smaller aortic diameters of <55 mm might be beneficial in selected patients to improve late survival.

Development of aortic arch surgery in Bologna and reflections on current strategy of cerebral protection.

Complications after open arch repair much decreased over time thanks to better methods of organ and cerebral protection. The crossroads was the introduction of antegrade cerebral perfusion as a method of cerebral protection. Other intraoperative techniques also contributed to facilitate arch reconstruction, such as performing circulatory arrest at higher core temperature, using hybrid grafts or endografts, and monitoring cerebral functions during the procedure. As part of this exciting process, we go back in Bologna in the early 1970s to relive some of these fundamental steps on aortic arch surgery. Today a large number of issues on cerebral protection remain for which we have incomplete responses. Probably, a super specialized approach and endovascular techniques will continue to improve the quality of care of patients with different arch pathologies.

The Triple-Layer Patch Technique for Postinfarction Ventricular Septal Rupture.

Postinfarction ventricular septal rupture (VSR) represents a well-known mechanical complication of myocardial infarction, determining cardiogenic shock with high mortality rates. Surgical correction requires significant expertise to avoid cardiac rupture, uncontrollable bleeding, residual shunts, heart failure, and death. In the last year, we observed a substantial increase of VSR at our hospital, related to the delayed presentation of people with acute chest pain to the emergency departments during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. We discuss our innovative triple-layer patch technique in a recent consecutive series of 8 patients. This technique proved effective in all patients, with no residual shunt or cardiac rupture.

Longest reported support (7.5 years) with postauricular type of Jarvik 2000 axial-flow left ventricular assist device.

Mechanical circulatory supports with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are nowadays an established treatment in end-stage heart failure for those patients who are waiting for an organ donation or are unsuitable for transplantation. The duration of LVAD support is variable, depending on the device, the intention to treat and the issues occurring during treatment, which can change the purpose treatment or accelerate the transplantation. Moreover, length of reported supports in the literature is heterogenous. In here, we present the clinical and surgical case of the longest LVAD support reported in the literature, as a bridge to transplantation, with axial pump Jarvik 2000 (Jarvik Heart, Inc, New York, NY).

Thoraflex hybrid as frozen elephant trunk in chronic, residual type A and chronic type B aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVES: The frozen elephant trunk technique is an increasingly common treatment for extensive disease of the thoracic aorta. The objective of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of frozen elephant trunk specifically in chronic (residual) aortic dissections, focusing on downstream aortic remodelling. METHODS: Between 2013 and 2019, a total of 28 patients were treated using the Vascutek Thoraflex hybrid graft at our institution for chronic dissections/post-dissection aneurysms. Immediate and follow-up outcomes were studied, as well as the changes in total aortic diameter, true lumen and false lumen diameter and the status of the false lumen at 3 different levels of the thoraco-abdominal aorta. RESULTS: No in-hospital or 30-day mortality was observed, temporary paraparesis rate was 7% and disabling stroke incidence was 14.3%. Freedom from all-cause mortality at 2 years was 91.6 ± 5.7%, while freedom from reintervention on the downstream aorta at 2 years was 59.1 ± 10.8%. Positive aortic remodelling was achieved in 50.0%, with an enlargement in the true lumen and a reduction of the false lumen not only at the level of the proximal descending aorta with 73.1% of complete thrombosis but also at the level of the distal descending thoracic aorta, with 41.7% of complete thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: The frozen elephant trunk is a good solution in chronic (residual) downstream aortic dissections inducing positive aortic remodelling and preventing from II stage operations or allowing an endovascular approach.

Mechanically Supported Early Graft Failure After Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of early graft failure (EGF) after heart transplantation (Htx) often requires a mechanical circulatory support (MCS) therapy. The aims of our study were to identify risk factors of mechanically supported severe EGF and evaluate their impact on both early and late outcomes. METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2019, 499 consecutive adult patients underwent Htx at our institution. Severe EGF was defined as the need for extracorporeal life support (ECLS) within 24 hours after surgery. All available recipient and donor variables were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, EGF occurred in 58 (11.6%) patients. Post-Htx peripheral or central ECLS was necessary in 32 (6.4%) cases. Independent predictors of severe EGF were, in the recipient group, preoperative transpulmonary gradient (TPG) >12 mm Hg (odds ratio [OR] 4.1, P = .013), preoperative inotropic score >10 (OR 7.3, P = .0001), and pre-Htx ECLS support (OR 5.2, P = .015), while in the donors, a Eurotransplant donor score ≥17 (OR 8.5, P = .005). The absence of EGF was related with a better survival at 1 year and 5 years (94% and 85%, respectively) compared with EGF requiring ECLS population (36% and 28% at 1 year and 5 years, respectively; P < .001). A five-year conditional survival rate did not differ significantly (85% no EGF vs 83% EGF requiring ECLS). CONCLUSION: Both donor and recipient factors may influence EGF occurrence. Post-Htx ECLS may impact negatively early; however, patients weaned from ECLS eventually benefit from such a rescue treatment with outcomes comparable with Htx patients who did not suffer EGF.

Donor risk analysis and validation in heart transplants: a single-centre experience.

OBJECTIVES: A heart transplant (Htx) remains the gold standard treatment for patients with advanced heart failure. Considering the limited availability of organs, donor risk scores might improve organ selection and allocation. The objective of the study was to compare United Network for Organ Sharing, RADIAL and Eurotransplant scoring models in calculating post-Htx outcomes in an Italian Htx population. METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2017, a total of 461 adult patients underwent Htxs. United Network for Organ Sharing, RADIAL and Eurotransplant scores were calculated. Clinical features and donor risk scores were tested to identify preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk variables and eventually validate the scores on our population. RESULTS: Early graft failure was detected in 16.1% (74/461). Post-Htx extracorporeal life support was used in 11.1% (51/461). Of the donor-related factors, the use of noradrenaline (P = 0.015) negatively influenced early outcomes, whereas an ischaemic time >240 min (P = 0.037) influenced early graft failure occurrence. The Eurotransplant donor score did not impact outcomes; the RADIAL score significantly influenced both early and late mortality; and the United Network for Organ Sharing score influenced only late mortality. On the multivariable analysis, after adjustment of scores per cohort, noradrenaline infusion was the main independent predictor of in-hospital mortality for the donors, whereas age of the recipient [odds ratio (OR) 1.003, 1.003-1.081; P = 0.032] and use of preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR 3.320, 1.124-9.805; P = 0.030) were the main independent predictors for the recipients. CONCLUSIONS: None of the validated donor scoring systems fully behave as reliable predictors of transplant outcomes. According to our 'local only' graft selection, specific donor and recipient risk variables should be monitored in order to predict early and late outcomes satisfactorily.

Percutaneous Pulmonary Artery Venting via Jugular Vein While on Peripheral Extracorporeal Life Support.

Peripheral extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) setting remains a valid option to treat cardiogenic shock (CS). We investigated a percutaneous approach to unload the left ventricle (LV) while on veno-arterial (v-a) peripheral ECMO support. Between 2017 and 2018, eight patients (three females, mean age: 49.6 years old, and five males, mean age: 58 years old, respectively) suffered refractory CS due to acute myocardial infarction (n = 4), acute myocarditis (n = 2), acute decompensation on chronic heart failure (n = 1), and primary graft failure after heart transplantation (Htx) (n = 1), respectively. After a multidisciplinary CS team discussion, it was decided to proceed with peripheral v-a ECMO placement and percutaneous LV venting via right internal jugular vein access to drain the pulmonary artery (PA), in the hybrid operating room. In a single postcardiotomy case, the PA trunk was vented centrally. Mean ECMO support time was 8.5 days. Seven (87.5%) patients were successfully weaned from ECMO and one (12.5%) successfully bridged to Htx. All patients were successfully discharged after treatment except for a single case who died due to sepsis. In case of not recommended usage of LV apical venting, the adoption of v-a peripheral ECMO support associated with percutaneous PA drainage enables the rapid onset of extracorporeal life support with an effective biventricular unloading.

Heart Transplant and Hepato-Renal Dysfunction: The Model of End-Stage Liver Disease Excluding International Normalized Ratio as a Predictor of Postoperative Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative liver and renal dysfunction remain surgical risk factors for both postoperative morbidity and mortality. The Model of End-Stage Liver Disease Excluding INR (international normalized ratio), or MELD-XI, score calculation may help as a predictor in patients with advanced heart failure. We analyzed the impact of progressive elevated MELD-XI values among recipients of heart transplant at our institution. METHODS: The data of a total of 425 consecutive adult patients who underwent heart transplantation, between January 2000 and August 2018, have been reviewed and divided into 3 cohorts according to preoperative MELD-XI calculations (MELD-XI < 11; MELD-XI 11-18; and MELD-XI > 18). Early and late outcomes have been analyzed. RESULTS: Patients with a MELD-XI score > 18 had a more critical clinical condition preoperatively and had a higher risk of early mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.45 [1.11-1.67], P < .001). They showed high risk for postoperative dialysis (HR 2.8 [1.5-5.3], P < .001), rethoracothomy for bleeding (HR 2.1 [1.2-4.1], P = .001), prolonged time of mechanical ventilation, time of intensive care unit stay (HR 2.2 [1.3-3.8], P = .005), and graft failure requiring mechanical circulatory support (HR 1.9 [1.1-3.3], P = .003). After risk adjustment per MELD-XI cohort, ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, redo operation, and cold ischemic time > 240 minutes resulted in being the strongest predictors of early mortality (P < .001). The 5-year and 10-year survival for MELD-XI > 18 cohort was 63% and 47% vs 72% and 59% in the control group (MELD-XI < 18) (log-rank, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with an elevated preoperative MELD-XI profile presented more comorbidities and significantly lower survival. This suggests the MELD-XI score may provide further insight into appropriate recipient and eventual donor selection. Renal insufficiency and congestive hepatopathy should be properly optimized before heart transplantation.

Less invasive ventricular enhancement (LIVE) as potential therapy for ischaemic cardiomyopathy end-stage heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Surgical ventricular reshaping (SVR) is a treatment option for patients with severe ischaemic heart failure (HF). Recently, a new minimally invasive, hybrid technique named "less invasive ventricular enhancement" (LIVE), has been developed adopting the Reviven™ Myocardial Anchoring System (BioVentrix Inc., San Ramon, CA, USA). METHODS: Between January 2015 and November 2018, 7 patients (5 men and 2 women; mean age 72±8.9 years) underwent LIVE procedure at our institution. RESULTS: Procedural success was 100%. A total anchors number of 3.0±0.9 was used to reshape the left ventricle (LV). Preoperative and postoperative echocardiographic assessments showed an increase of LV ejection fraction (EF) from 22.8%±8.1% to 35%±7.2% (P=0.001) and a decrease of LV volumes in terms of LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVI), from 93.2±10.5 to 52.1±15.1 mL/m2 (P<0.001), and LV end-diastolic volume index LVEDVI, from 137.2±20.1 to 78±10.2 mL/m2 (P=0.001), respectively. In all patients functional mitral regurgitation (MR) prior to surgery decreased significantly after LIVE procedure. In 1 patient, the occurrence of right ventricle perforation required correction through a standard sternotomy. All patients survived the surgical procedure. The mean duration of intensive care unit stay was 7.8 days (range, 1-22 days), and the mean length of hospital stay was 22.1 days (range, 9-45 days). Mean follow-up (FU) time was 189.7±104.5 days. Average NYHA functional class at FU was 1.4±0.9 compared to 3.4±0.6 preoperatively (P=0.001). All patients were in satisfactory clinical condition and resumed their own daily activities. Echocardiographic monitorings at FU were stable and comparable to the above mentioned results at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk patients and selected cases, LIVE procedure may be advantageous both technically and clinically. Preliminary results of this novel hybrid treatment for symptomatic ischaemic cardiomyopathy are encouraging, in terms of significant improvement in LV EF, reduction in LV volumes and functional MR grade.

The Decision-Making Process in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: When to Replace the Aortic Arch.

The decision-making process is crucial for the surgery of acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD). Often surgeons have to face different challenges, taking prompt decisions in emergency setting, during the pre- and intraoperative phase. Choosing if operate or not a patients with AAAD as well as the management of the dissected aortic arch can be challenging. Different factors need to be evaluated as: the patients age, the presence of organ malperfusion, the intimal tear location, and last but not least the surgeon personal experience in aortic surgery. During the last decade, different milestone steps have been achieved in aortic surgery as the antegrade perfusion of the aorta through different cannulation sites, open distal repair, antegrade selective cerebral perfusion, and systematic resection of the proximal intimal tear, allowing complex repair for dedicated team as well as simpler repair for not dedicated surgeons. We reviewed different scenarios and techniques used for the aortic arch replacement in patients with AAAD, taking into consideration that the aim of surgery is to save patients life.

Postcardiotomy Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients Aged 70 Years or Older.

BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty whether venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) should be used in older patients with cardiopulmonary failure after cardiac surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study of 781 patients who required postcardiotomy VA-ECMO for cardiopulmonary failure after adult cardiac surgery from 2010 to 2018 at 19 cardiac surgery centers. A parallel systematic review with meta-analysis of the literature was performed. RESULTS: The hospital mortality in the overall Postcardiotomy Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (PC-ECMO) series was 64.4%. A total of 255 patients were 70 years old or older (32.7%), and their hospital mortality was significantly higher than in younger patients (76.1% vs 58.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.199; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.536 to 3.149). Arterial lactate level greater than 6 mmol/L before starting VA-ECMO was the only predictor of hospital mortality among patients 70 years old or older in univariate analysis (82.6% vs 70.4%; P = .029). Meta-analysis of current and previous studies showed that early mortality after postcardiotomy VA-ECMO was significantly higher in patients aged 70 years or older compared with younger patients (odds ratio, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.59 to 2.75; 5 studies including 1547 patients; I2, 5.9%). The pooled early mortality rate among patients aged 70 years or older was 78.8% (95% CI, 74.1 to 83.5; 6 studies including 617 patients; I2, 41.8%). Two studies reported 1-year mortality (including hospital mortality) of 79.9% and 75.6%, respectively, in patients 70 years old or older. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced age should not be considered a contraindication for postcardiotomy VA-ECMO. However, in view of the high risk of early mortality, meaningful scrutiny is needed before using VA-ECMO after cardiac surgery in older patients.

Outflow graft tunneling through the transverse sinus for HeartWare HVAD implantation as bridge to heart transplantation strategy.

Left ventricular assist device graft protection and its intraoperative orientation continues to be a major concern in bridge-to-transplant strategy. Different techniques have been described, including the adoption of a standard full sternotomy approach. We describe our institutional experience of placement of the with HeartWare HVAD® implantable continuous flow pump, with outflow graft tunnelling through the transverse sinus to prepare patients in need of eventual re-sternotomy. Surgical tips are provided in the tutorial videos both for HVAD® placement, and for explantation at the time of heart transplantation.

Role and management of extracorporeal life support after surgery of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is a surgical intervention reserved for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). In some cases, temporary circulatory support [extracorporeal life support (ECLS)] is required after PEA. Rates of ECLS requirement varies between centers. Reasons for institution of ECLS include respiratory failure, cardiac failure (or both respiratory and cardiac failure), bleeding, and reperfusion edema. This article reviews the experience of ECLS after PEA from the current literature, as well as our own institution's experience as a CTEPH multidisciplinary center. METHODS: A literature review was conducted along with a retrospective chart review from 15 years of our PEA program. RESULTS: The literature demonstrates many different approaches are used for mechanically supporting patients who develop complications after PEA. Variations in approach stem from differing indications such as, respiratory failure rather than hemodynamic compromise (or vice versa), time of implantation (immediately in operating room or delayed after surgery) and many other causes. In our center, 12.3% (19/154) of patients need ECLS with extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO) after PEA procedure. Implantation was mainly in the operating room before or immediately after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass and mostly peripheral cannulation was used. ECMO lasted an average of 11±8 days. And 52.6% (10 of 19 patients) of patients were weaned from ECLS and of this, 70% (7 of 10 patients) were discharged. CONCLUSIONS: In some cases of PEA, ECLS is needed post-operatively. Expert teams should consider this possibility pre-operatively based on predisposing characteristics. The need for ECMO shouldn't be "di per se" a contraindication to surgery but might be considered in the surgical risk estimation. The ideal setup is not fixed and depends on the center's practices as well as indication. Even though complications do occur with ECMO, in general, results are good, being a bridge to further recovery of pulmonary hypertension (PH) or also to transplantation.